Alibaba launches Qwen-3.5 with open and closed versions
60% cheaper and 8× stronger at handling large workloads
Built for the emerging “agentic AI” era
source: qwen.ai
Alibaba Unveils Qwen-3.5 Ahead of Lunar New Year
Alibaba Cloud has introduced its next-generation AI model family, Qwen-3.5, just ahead of the Lunar New Year. The launch is part of a broader wave of new flagship AI releases from major Chinese developers. The models are available through Alibaba Cloud’s Model Studio and are designed to strengthen China’s position in the global AI race.
Two Models, Different Strategies
The company released Qwen-3.5-Open-Source, a 397-billion-parameter model whose weights are publicly available on Hugging Face and ModelScope. Alibaba claims it outperforms its earlier trillion-parameter model while matching leading systems from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind.
Qwen-3.5-Plus remains closed-source and offers a 1-million-token context window, targeting enterprise customers and large deployments.
Built for the Agentic AI Era
Alibaba says Qwen-3.5 is 60% cheaper to use and delivers eight times better performance on large workloads compared to its predecessor. It includes multimodal features, understanding text, images, audio, and video. The model also introduces “visual agentic capabilities,” allowing it to operate mobile and desktop apps and complete multi-step tasks independently.
Intensifying Chinese AI Competition
Qwen competes with Chinese rivals such as ByteDance’s Doubao and DeepSeek. With expanded support for 201 languages and growing global downloads, Alibaba’s latest release signals rising competition between Chinese AI leaders.
Impact on Global AI Leaders
The launch of Qwen-3.5 increases competitive pressure on global AI leaders like OpenAI (ChatGPT), Anthropic (Claude), and xAI (Grok). While it may not immediately reduce their global user base, it strengthens China’s domestic alternatives and expands open-weight adoption worldwide. If Qwen delivers similar performance at lower cost, it could attract developers, startups, and enterprises looking for cheaper large-context models.
However, brand trust, ecosystem integration, and enterprise partnerships still give US firms a strong advantage outside China. In short, it may not disrupt them overnight, but it clearly raises the competitive stakes.
Choosing between the Motorola Signature and Oppo Reno 15 isn’t just about specs; it’s about deciding how much flagship power you really need. One promises next-gen performance, a 165Hz LTPO display, and 8K Dolby Vision recording, while the other focuses on battery endurance and value pricing. With nearly ₹13,000 separating them, this comparison matters for buyers who want to know whether the premium jump truly delivers a better long-term experience or if the Reno 15 already offers everything most users actually need.
Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.
Design and Display
Build and Feel
The Motorola Signature features Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front, an aluminum frame, IP68/IP69 certification, and MIL-STD-810H compliance. It feels flagship in both durability and finish, with thoughtful extras like UWB support and Smart Connect. The Oppo Reno 15 also offers IP68/IP69 protection, Gorilla Glass 7i, and a premium glass back with an aluminum frame. However, the Signature’s stronger glass and added ecosystem features make it feel more complete and future-ready. The Reno 15 still carries a refined aesthetic, but it leans more toward style than rugged confidence.
Display Quality
Motorola Signature’s 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED panel pushes boundaries with 165Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and an eye-catching 6200 nits peak brightness. It feels built for gaming and HDR streaming at the highest level. Oppo Reno 15 offers a sharp AMOLED panel with 120Hz and HDR10+, but brightness and refresh rate are more conventional. The Signature clearly delivers a more immersive and smoother experience.
Verdict
Motorola Signature wins this round with its brighter LTPO display, higher refresh rate, and tougher glass protection.
Specifications Including Battery
Performance
Motorola Signature runs on Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 with UFS 4.1 storage and up to 16GB RAM. Combined with Android 16 and seven promised major updates, it positions itself as a long-term powerhouse. Performance is flagship-grade, built for gaming, AI workloads, and heavy multitasking. Oppo Reno 15 uses Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 with UFS 3.1 storage, offering solid upper mid-range performance. It handles daily tasks smoothly, but doesn’t match flagship-level power. The Signature simply operates in a higher performance tier.
Battery and Charging
Oppo Reno 15 packs a larger 6500mAh battery with 80W wired charging and broad charging protocol support. It’s clearly designed for endurance-focused users. Motorola Signature offers 5200mAh but compensates with 90W wired, 50W wireless, and reverse wireless charging. The wireless flexibility makes it feel more premium and versatile.
Verdict
Motorola Signature wins on raw performance and charging versatility, while Reno 15 excels in sheer battery capacity.
Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Motorola Signature offers a triple 50MP setup, including a periscope telephoto with 3x optical zoom and advanced 8K Dolby Vision video recording. The sensor sizes and stabilization give it strong flagship credibility. Oppo Reno 15 also features a 50MP main and 50MP telephoto with 3.5x optical zoom, but its 8MP ultrawide is less competitive. Video tops out at 4K, making it less ambitious overall. The Signature’s camera system feels more complete and high-end.
Selfie Camera
Both phones feature 50MP selfie cameras with 4K recording. Reno 15 offers an ultrawide selfie lens, which is useful for group shots. Motorola Signature, however, includes dual-pixel autofocus and higher frame rate options, giving it more versatility for video creators.
Verdict
Motorola Signature takes the edge thanks to stronger ultrawide hardware and advanced 8K Dolby Vision recording.
Pricing
Motorola Signature is priced around $660 (₹59,000), positioning it firmly in flagship territory. Oppo Reno 15 comes in at approximately $500 (₹46,000), targeting upper mid-range buyers. The price gap is significant, but so is the performance and display difference.
For buyers who want top-tier processing, LTPO 165Hz display, wireless charging, and extended Android updates, the Signature justifies its higher price. However, Reno 15 offers strong cameras, a massive battery, and premium build at a more accessible price, making it a smart value-driven option.
Verdict
Motorola Signature delivers more power and features, while Oppo Reno 15 offers better value for budget-conscious buyers.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.
Conclusion
Motorola Signature stands out with Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, 165Hz LTPO display, 8K Dolby Vision recording, wireless charging, UWB support, and seven Android upgrades. It is clearly engineered for users who want cutting-edge hardware and longevity.
Oppo Reno 15 shines with its 6500mAh battery, solid telephoto performance, fast 80W charging, and competitive pricing. It feels tailored for users who prioritize endurance and balanced daily performance without stretching the budget too far.
Verdict
Motorola Signature is the superior flagship with stronger performance, display, and camera technology. Oppo Reno 15 is the smarter pick for value-focused buyers who want reliability, battery life, and solid camera performance at a lower price point.
Choosing between the Motorola Signature and the OnePlus 13s isn’t just about specs; it’s about deciding what kind of flagship experience truly matters. One promises cutting-edge display tech, pro-grade cameras, and long-term software support, while the other focuses on compact power, strong battery life, and aggressive pricing. For buyers spending flagship-level money, understanding where each phone truly excels can make the difference between a good purchase and a great one.
Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.
Design and Display
Build and Feel
The Motorola Signature delivers a true flagship vibe with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front, an aluminum frame, and IP68/IP69 protection. It also carries MIL-STD-810H compliance and Ultra Wideband support, pushing it toward premium durability territory. The OnePlus 13s keeps things refined with a glass and aluminum build, but its IP65 rating feels more mid-premium than ultra-flagship. Motorola’s ultrasonic fingerprint scanner adds a more advanced touch compared to the optical unit on the 13s. The Signature feels engineered for long-term flagship ownership, while the 13s leans toward compact practicality.
Display Quality
Motorola packs a 165Hz LTPO AMOLED panel with Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and a stunning 6200-nit peak brightness. It’s built for outdoor clarity and fluid gaming. The OnePlus 13s offers a smaller LTPO AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and 2160Hz PWM dimming, which is easier on the eyes. However, brightness and refresh fluidity clearly favor Motorola.
Verdict
Motorola Signature wins with superior protection, brightness, and refresh rate, making it feel more premium overall.
Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Motorola Signature runs on Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 with UFS 4.1 storage and up to 16GB RAM, paired with Android 16 and seven major updates. That long-term support adds serious value. The OnePlus 13s uses Snapdragon 8 Elite, which delivers slightly higher peak clock speeds and strong efficiency. However, it runs Android 15 with OxygenOS 16 and fewer confirmed upgrade commitments. Both are powerhouse performers, but Motorola’s update promise strengthens long-term reliability.
Battery and Charging
Motorola houses a 5200mAh silicon-carbon battery with 90W wired, 50W wireless, and reverse wireless charging. OnePlus counters with a larger 5850mAh battery and 80W wired charging, plus bypass charging. The 13s may last longer per charge, but Motorola’s wireless ecosystem adds versatility that feels more complete.
Verdict
Motorola edges ahead for balanced power, faster wireless charging, and longer software support.
Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Motorola Signature features a triple 50MP setup, including a 3x periscope telephoto and ultrawide lens. It supports 8K recording with Dolby Vision and 10-bit HDR10+, placing it firmly in pro-grade territory. The OnePlus 13s offers a dual 50MP system with 2x optical zoom and Dolby Vision 4K recording. While capable, it lacks a dedicated ultrawide lens and advanced zoom flexibility. Motorola’s setup feels built for versatility and creative freedom.
Selfie Camera
Motorola’s 50MP front camera with dual-pixel autofocus supports 4K at up to 60fps, delivering flagship-level clarity. The OnePlus 13s includes a 32MP autofocus selfie shooter with 4K at 30fps. Both are solid, but Motorola provides sharper output and better video options.
Verdict
Motorola Signature clearly dominates with its triple-camera flexibility and 8K Dolby Vision capability.
Pricing
Motorola Signature is priced at approximately $660 / ₹59,000, while the OnePlus 13s comes in around $650 / ₹51,000. The price gap in India is noticeable, with OnePlus undercutting Motorola by a meaningful margin. The 13s offers flagship-grade performance at a lower cost, making it attractive for value-focused buyers. However, Motorola justifies its higher price through superior display brightness, triple cameras, stronger protection ratings, and wireless charging support.
For users prioritizing compact design and cost savings, the OnePlus 13s feels like a smart buy. Those seeking full flagship features may find Motorola’s pricing justified.
Verdict
OnePlus 13s wins on value, but Motorola offers more features for the premium paid.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.
Conclusion
Motorola Signature stands out with its 165Hz ultra-bright display, triple 50MP camera system, 8K Dolby Vision video, UWB support, and 50W wireless charging. It also promises seven Android upgrades, which strengthens long-term appeal. The OnePlus 13s impresses with a compact form factor, larger battery, bypass charging, and competitive pricing. OxygenOS also remains one of the cleaner Android experiences, which many users appreciate.
Motorola feels like a complete flagship experience without compromises. The OnePlus 13s feels like a refined, high-performance compact alternative that prioritizes efficiency and price.
Verdict
Overall, the Motorola Signature is the better all-around flagship thanks to its brighter 165Hz display, more versatile triple cameras with 8K video, stronger durability, wireless charging, and longer software support. It simply offers a more complete and future-proof experience. OnePlus 13s remains a strong value option with great performance and battery at a lower price, but in pure overall capability, the Motorola Signature takes the lead.
Flagship battles are no longer just about specs, they’re about value versus raw power. The Motorola Signature and OnePlus 15 represent two different philosophies in the premium Android space. One focuses on balance, long-term software support, and an ultra-bright display at a competitive price, while the other pushes performance limits with a massive battery and cutting-edge chipset. For buyers deciding where to invest serious money, this comparison reveals which phone truly delivers the smarter flagship experience.
Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.
Design and Display
Build and Feel
Motorola Signature features a Gorilla Glass Victus 2 front, an aluminum frame, IP68/IP69 protection, and MIL-STD-810H compliance. It feels premium yet balanced, with added durability confidence. OnePlus 15 also uses Victus 2 with an aluminum alloy frame and offers IP68/IP69K protection, plus a unique Micro-Arc Oxidation finish on select variants. Both look flagship-grade, but Motorola’s cleaner aesthetic and Bose-tuned audio branding give it a slightly more refined personality, while OnePlus feels bold and performance-focused.
Display Quality
Motorola Signature packs a 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED with 165Hz refresh rate and an extreme 6200 nits peak brightness, alongside Dolby Vision and HDR10+. OnePlus 15 matches the 165Hz LTPO panel and Dolby Vision but peaks at 1800 nits in HBM and adds Ultra HDR support. Both displays are ultra-smooth and vibrant, yet Motorola’s higher peak brightness gives it stronger outdoor visibility on paper.
Verdict
Motorola Signature feels more balanced and brighter overall, while OnePlus 15 leans toward a flashy, high-performance visual experience.
Specifications Including Battery
Performance
Motorola Signature runs on Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 with Adreno 829, while OnePlus 15 steps ahead with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Adreno 840. The OnePlus chip pushes higher clock speeds, clearly targeting gamers and heavy multitaskers. Both offer UFS 4.1 storage and up to 16GB RAM, but OnePlus positions itself as the raw performance leader. Motorola, however, promises up to seven major Android upgrades, which strengthens its long-term value. That extended support makes it feel like a safer investment for longevity.
Battery and Charging
Motorola houses a 5200mAh silicon-carbon battery with 90W wired and 50W wireless charging. OnePlus dominates capacity with a massive 7,300mAh battery and 120W wired charging, reaching full charge in about 40 minutes. It also supports multiple fast-charging standards and bypass charging. OnePlus clearly targets power users who demand endurance.
Verdict
For pure speed and battery life, the OnePlus 15 leads. For long-term software support, Motorola Signature holds a strategic advantage.
Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Motorola Signature delivers a triple 50MP setup including a 3x periscope telephoto and ultrawide lens, supporting 8K Dolby Vision recording and 4K at 120fps. OnePlus 15 also features triple 50MP sensors with a 3.5x periscope and advanced color tuning tools like LUT preview. Both support 8K video, but OnePlus offers slightly longer optical zoom. Motorola’s larger primary sensor may offer better natural light capture, giving it a more photography-focused feel.
Selfie Camera
Motorola steps ahead with a 50MP autofocus selfie shooter capable of 4K at up to 60fps. OnePlus uses a 32MP autofocus camera with 4K video. The higher resolution and dual-pixel PDAF on Motorola suggest sharper and more detailed front shots.
Verdict
Motorola feels stronger for balanced photography and selfies, while OnePlus leans toward creative flexibility and tuning tools.
Pricing
Motorola Signature is priced at approximately $660 (₹59,000), while the OnePlus 15 sits at around $900 (₹80,000). That is a significant price gap. Motorola delivers a flagship-grade display, triple 50MP cameras, a premium build, and long-term updates at a much lower price. OnePlus justifies its premium with a larger battery, faster charging, and a stronger chipset. The difference reflects performance ambition versus value balance.
Is the Price Justified?
OnePlus 15 justifies its pricing for gamers and power users who want maximum battery and performance. However, Motorola Signature offers near-flagship specs at a noticeably lower cost, making it feel like the smarter value pick for most buyers.
Verdict
Motorola Signature offers stronger value for money, while OnePlus 15 caters to those willing to pay extra for top-tier power.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.
Conclusion
Motorola Signature stands out with ultra-high peak brightness, seven Android upgrades, Bose-tuned sound, and a 50MP selfie camera. OnePlus 15 counters with a massive 7300mAh battery, 120W fast charging, bypass charging, advanced HDR display support, and slightly stronger chipset performance. Motorola feels balanced and longevity-focused, while OnePlus feels engineered for speed and endurance.
Verdict
Motorola Signature is the better all-rounder and value flagship. OnePlus 15 is the powerhouse choice for users who prioritize battery life and peak performance above all else.
Choosing a flagship smartphone today is no longer just about brand loyalty; it is about balancing performance, innovation, and value. The Motorola Signature enters the premium segment with aggressive hardware and pricing, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 represents Samsung’s refined, ecosystem-driven approach to flagship excellence. With both offering long-term software support and cutting-edge chipsets, this comparison explores which device truly delivers the smarter overall investment.
Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.
Design and Display
Build and Feel
The Motorola Signature features Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on the front with an aluminum frame and carries IP68/IP69 protection plus MIL-STD-810H compliance. It feels premium and engineered for durability, clearly targeting users who want flagship elegance with added toughness.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 uses Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both front and back with an Armor Aluminum 2 frame and IP68 rating. Its compact form factor makes it more pocket-friendly and easier for one-handed use. Samsung’s finish feels refined and polished, while Motorola leans slightly toward bold and performance-centric design language.
Display Quality
Motorola pushes boundaries with a 6.8-inch LTPO AMOLED panel, 165Hz refresh rate, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, and a massive 6200-nit peak brightness. It is built for immersive gaming and outdoor visibility.
Samsung counters with a 6.2-inch Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X display at 120Hz and 2600-nit peak brightness. While smaller, it delivers sharp visuals and color tuning that feels balanced and consistent.
Verdict
Motorola wins on sheer display specs and brightness. Samsung feels more compact and refined for everyday comfort.
Specifications Including Battery
Performance
The Motorola Signature runs on Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3nm) with up to 16GB RAM and UFS 4.1 storage. It is tuned for raw power and future-ready performance, supported by Android 16 with seven major upgrades.
The Galaxy S25 features Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), paired with 12GB RAM and UFS 4.0 storage. Samsung’s optimization through One UI 8 ensures smooth multitasking and strong thermal management. While Motorola emphasizes peak power, Samsung focuses on stability and ecosystem polish.
Battery and Charging
Motorola packs a 5200mAh battery with 90W wired, 50W wireless, and reverse charging support. It clearly prioritizes fast top-ups and endurance.
Samsung offers a 4000mAh battery with 25W wired and 15W wireless charging. It remains reliable but not class-leading in charging speed.
Verdict
Motorola dominates in battery size and charging speed. Samsung delivers consistent, optimized performance but feels conservative on power upgrades.
Camera
Main and Secondary Lenses
Motorola equips a triple 50MP setup including a 3x periscope telephoto and ultrawide lens, plus 8K Dolby Vision video recording. The larger sensors and periscope zoom add versatility for photography enthusiasts.
Samsung uses a 50MP main sensor, 10MP 3x telephoto, and 12MP ultrawide. It supports 8K video and advanced computational features like Best Face. Samsung’s image processing tends to favor vibrant output, while Motorola appears to focus on hardware strength and detail retention.
Selfie Camera
Motorola offers a 50MP front camera with 4K recording and dual-pixel PDAF, giving it an edge in clarity and flexibility.
Samsung includes a 12MP dual-pixel selfie camera with HDR10+ support, optimized for natural skin tones and social media sharing.
Verdict
Motorola wins on camera hardware and selfie resolution. Samsung excels in computational photography and consistent color science.
Pricing
Motorola Signature is priced around $660 / ₹59,000, positioning it aggressively in the flagship space. For the hardware offered, a 165Hz display, 90W charging, periscope zoom, and 5200mAh battery, it delivers strong value.
Samsung Galaxy S25 costs approximately $800 / ₹75,000. The premium largely reflects brand value, ecosystem integration, and software refinement. Samsung devices traditionally hold resale value better and benefit from deeper ecosystem support.
Motorola clearly undercuts Samsung by a significant margin while offering higher peak specs in several areas. Samsung justifies its price through optimization, compact flagship appeal, and ecosystem continuity.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.
Verdict
Motorola offers better hardware value for money. Samsung charges more for polish, brand strength, and ecosystem advantages.
Conclusion
Motorola stands out with its 165Hz ultra-bright display, 90W fast charging, 50MP triple camera system with periscope zoom, UWB support, and Bose-tuned audio. It feels like a performance flagship built to impress on paper and in real-world speed.
Samsung differentiates itself with One UI refinement, Samsung DeX and Wireless DeX desktop experience, compact flagship design, and long-term ecosystem reliability. It feels cohesive and mature rather than experimental.
Verdict
For most buyers, the Motorola Signature is the better overall pick because it delivers more flagship hardware for less money.
The Galaxy S25 is ideal for those who prioritize brand ecosystem, compact design, and software refinement over raw specifications.
Choosing between the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro and the OnePlus Pad 3 isn’t just about specs; it’s about deciding what kind of tablet experience fits your lifestyle. One focuses on flagship power in a sleek, portable form at a competitive price, while the other pushes toward a larger, laptop-style productivity machine with immersive multimedia. For buyers balancing performance, display size, battery life, and value, this comparison highlights which tablet truly delivers more for the money, and which one fits specific usage needs better.
OnePlus – Larger screen + richer speaker setup for immersive media
Portability & Build
5.8mm thin, ~485g, easier to hold for long sessions
Larger 289.6×209.7×6mm, 675g, more desk-oriented
Xiaomi – Much lighter and more portable
Processor & Performance
Snapdragon 8 Elite, UFS 4.1
Snapdragon 8 Elite, UFS 4.0
Xiaomi – Same power but slightly faster storage
Battery & Charging
9200 mAh, 67W fast, 22.5W reverse charging
12140 mAh, 80W fast
OnePlus – Bigger battery and quicker charging overall
Camera Quality
50MP rear + 32MP selfie, 4K@60fps
13MP rear + 8MP selfie
Xiaomi – Far better cameras for photos & video calls
Design and Display
Build Quality
The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro focuses on portability with its slim 5.8mm aluminum body and sub-500g weight, making it easier to hold for long reading or gaming sessions. It feels compact yet premium. The OnePlus Pad 3, on the other hand, is significantly larger and heavier at 675g, built more like a laptop replacement. Its expansive chassis suits desk use but is less travel-friendly. The difference in size alone changes how each tablet fits into daily life.
Display & Multimedia
Xiaomi offers an 11.2-inch 3:2 IPS LCD with 144Hz refresh rate, HDR10, Dolby Vision, and 800 nits peak brightness. The sharper 344 ppi density makes text look crisp. OnePlus counters with a massive 13.2-inch 144Hz IPS LCD panel, brighter at 900 nits HBM and ideal for split-screen productivity. For audio, OnePlus dominates with 8 speakers, while Xiaomi includes a capable 4-speaker Dolby Atmos setup.
Verdict
Xiaomi wins for portability and sharper visuals; OnePlus wins for immersive size and louder multimedia output.
Performance and Software
Processor & UI Smoothness
Both tablets run the Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) with Adreno 830 GPU, meaning flagship-level performance across gaming, rendering, and multitasking. Raw power is identical. Xiaomi ships with Android 16 and HyperOS 3, giving it a slight software freshness advantage. OnePlus runs Android 15 with ColorOS 15, which remains fluid but is technically a generation behind. With UFS 4.1 storage on Xiaomi (except base) and UFS 4.0 on OnePlus, both feel extremely fast.
Productivity & Multitasking
OnePlus Pad 3 benefits from its larger 13.2-inch canvas, making split-screen apps and document editing more comfortable. Xiaomi’s 3:2 aspect ratio, however, is better optimized for reading and browsing. RAM configurations go up to 16GB on both, ensuring heavy apps run smoothly. Xiaomi’s lighter weight makes handheld productivity easier, while OnePlus feels more desk-oriented.
Verdict
Performance is equal; Xiaomi edges ahead in software freshness, while OnePlus excels in large-screen multitasking.
Battery and Accessories
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro packs a 9200mAh battery with 67W fast charging and even 22.5W reverse wired charging, a rare bonus. OnePlus Pad 3 steps ahead with a massive 12140mAh battery and faster 80W charging. For extended binge sessions or long workdays, the OnePlus simply lasts longer due to its capacity advantage.
Stylus, Keyboard & Ecosystem
Both support stylus input, but Xiaomi includes magnetic stylus support integrated neatly into its slim frame. OnePlus supports stylus and keyboard accessories and benefits from a productivity-focused large display. However, Xiaomi’s infrared port adds smart-home control flexibility, a small but practical addition rarely seen today.
Verdict
OnePlus wins on battery endurance; Xiaomi stands out for reverse charging and compact accessory integration.
Camera & Media
Rear and Front Camera
Xiaomi equips a 50MP rear camera and a 32MP ultrawide selfie camera, far exceeding typical tablet standards. OnePlus keeps it basic with a 13MP rear and 8MP front camera. For document scanning, video calls, or occasional content capture, Xiaomi clearly offers more versatility and sharper detail.
Video & Audio Quality
Both support 4K video recording on the rear camera, but Xiaomi allows 4K at 60fps, giving it more flexibility. OnePlus includes gyro-EIS for steadier footage. In audio, the 8-speaker system on the OnePlus Pad 3 delivers a more cinematic soundstage compared to Xiaomi’s 4-speaker setup.
Verdict
Xiaomi dominates camera hardware; OnePlus wins in speaker immersion.
Pricing
At around $400 / ₹35,000, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro delivers flagship chipset performance at a much more aggressive price. The OnePlus Pad 3, priced at $600 / ₹48,000, justifies its premium with a bigger display, larger battery, and stronger multimedia system.
Value-focused buyers will naturally gravitate toward Xiaomi, while users seeking a laptop-like tablet experience may consider the OnePlus worth the extra investment.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.
Conclusion
Xiaomi stands out with its 3:2 high-resolution panel, stronger cameras, lighter build, reverse charging, and newer Android version. OnePlus impresses with its massive 13.2-inch display, 8-speaker setup, and huge battery capacity.
Verdict
For pure value and portability, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro feels like the smarter buy. For big-screen productivity and cinematic entertainment, the OnePlus Pad 3 offers a more expansive experience, but at a noticeable premium.
Choosing between the Google Pixel Watch 4 and the Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic isn’t just about picking a smartwatch; it’s about deciding what kind of experience you want on your wrist. One focuses on lightweight comfort, fast charging, and clean Wear OS integration at a much lower price, while the other leans into premium materials, a rotating bezel, and deeper health insights with a clear flagship feel. With both running Wear OS 6 and targeting Android users, this comparison highlights where the real differences matter in daily use, long-term value, and health tracking depth, making it easier to see which watch truly fits your lifestyle.
Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.
Design and Display
Build & Comfort
The Pixel Watch 4 keeps things light and minimal with an aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass 5 protection. At 31–37g, it feels noticeably lighter on the wrist and suits all-day wear comfortably. In contrast, the Galaxy Watch8 Classic uses a stainless steel frame with a sapphire crystal and adds a rotating bezel for tactile navigation. At 63.5g, it feels premium but substantially heavier. Samsung also brings MIL-STD-810H compliance and blood pressure hardware, adding to its rugged appeal.
Display Brightness & Visibility
Both watches push up to 3000 nits peak brightness, making outdoor visibility excellent. The Pixel Watch 4 has a slightly larger 1.4-inch LTPO AMOLED panel, while Samsung offers a 1.34-inch Super AMOLED with sapphire protection and slightly higher pixel density. Sharpness is comparable, but Samsung’s sapphire layer feels more durable long-term.
Verdict
Samsung wins on durability and premium feel, while the Pixel Watch 4 excels in lightweight comfort and everyday wearability.
Health and Fitness Tracking
Sensors & Tracking Accuracy
Both models include heart rate, SpO2, skin temperature, ECG, and advanced motion sensors. Samsung goes further with BioActive technology, blood pressure monitoring, and an antioxidant index, giving it a broader health portfolio. Pixel Watch 4 adds skin conductance and satellite SOS (LTE models), which enhances safety features.
Samsung’s broader medical-style tracking may appeal more to serious health users, while Google keeps things clean and essential.
Workout Modes
Both watches support multi-satellite GPS (L1+L5), ensuring accurate route tracking. Samsung includes additional positioning systems like BDS and offers deeper health ecosystem integration. Pixel’s UWB support adds future-ready connectivity perks.
Verdict
Galaxy Watch8 Classic takes the lead for advanced health metrics, though Pixel Watch 4 covers most essentials comfortably.
Performance and Software
UI Smoothness
Both run Wear OS 6, but Samsung layers One UI 8 Watch on top and powers the device with a newer 3nm Exynos W1000 chip. Pixel Watch 4 uses the Snapdragon W5 Gen 2 (4nm). Day-to-day performance should feel smooth on both, though Samsung’s newer silicon and penta-core setup suggest stronger long-term efficiency.
App Support & Features
Pixel offers 32GB storage, while Samsung doubles it to 64GB, useful for offline music and apps. Both support NFC payments, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and eSIM LTE models. Pixel adds Ultra Wideband support, a forward-thinking feature not present on Samsung.
Verdict
Samsung edges ahead in raw hardware and storage, but the Pixel Watch 4 stands out for UWB and clean software integration.
Battery and Connectivity
Battery Life
Pixel Watch 4 packs a 455mAh battery, slightly larger than Samsung’s 445mAh unit. Charging is notably faster on Pixel, reaching 100% in as little as 45–60 minutes, depending on size. Samsung relies on 10W wireless charging, which is convenient but slower.
Fast top-ups can make a real difference for busy users who forget overnight charging.
GPS, Bluetooth, LTE
Both support dual-band GPS (L1+L5), NFC, Wi-Fi, and eSIM LTE. Pixel supports Bluetooth 6.0, while Samsung sticks to Bluetooth 5.3. Samsung includes more satellite systems, giving it broader positioning support.
Verdict
Pixel Watch 4 wins for faster charging and newer Bluetooth, while Samsung offers broader satellite compatibility.
Pricing
Pixel Watch 4 starts around $300 / ₹28,000, making it significantly more affordable. The Galaxy Watch8 Classic comes in at $450 / ₹41,000, reflecting its stainless steel build, sapphire glass, and expanded health features.
Samsung feels more premium, but Pixel delivers stronger value for money.
Disclaimer: Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.
Conclusion
Pixel Watch 4 is ideal for users who want a lightweight, fast-charging smartwatch with solid core health tracking and modern connectivity like UWB. It balances features and affordability very well.
Galaxy Watch8 Classic suits buyers who prioritize premium materials, rotating bezel navigation, deeper health metrics like blood pressure monitoring, and larger storage capacity.
Final Verdict
For value and comfort, Pixel Watch 4 stands out. For premium hardware and advanced health features, Galaxy Watch8 Classic takes the crown.
Login
