For years Premier League referees have allowed wrestling matches to develop at set-pieces, when corners and free-kicks are taken.

Shirt pulling, blocking runs, grappling, holding attackers, backing into goalkeepers and outright manhandling have slowly become normalised. Players now expect it because officials have spent so long tolerating it.

The result is the mess we witnessed throughout the 2024/25 and 2025/26 seasons — endless controversy, confusion, inconsistency and VAR interventions that seemed to change from week to week.

The worrying part is this was entirely avoidable.

PGMOL now says it will review the issue this summer but many supporters will rightly ask why the game’s officials allowed things to deteriorate so badly before taking action.

Referees have become victims of their own inconsistency.

For years, the standard approach at corners appeared to be:“Unless it is absolutely outrageous, let it go.”

That created an environment where players constantly pushed the boundaries. Defenders learned they could impede runners. Attackers learned they could obstruct goalkeepers. Both sides began grappling because everyone knew very little would actually be punished.

Once VAR arrived, the contradictions became even more obvious.

Officials suddenly had slow-motion replays of incidents that had routinely been ignored for years. The problem was not simply whether VAR intervened — it was that almost identical incidents produced completely different outcomes depending on the referee, VAR official or even the mood of the week.

Supporters can accept strict officiating.

Supporters can even accept mistakes.

What supporters cannot accept is inconsistency.

One week a player is penalised for minimal contact on a goalkeeper. The next week, another goalkeeper is completely blocked at a corner and the goal stands.

One week holding at a corner is deemed “part of the game.” The next week, VAR intervenes for “clear non-footballing action.”

That phrase itself became important this season.

The Premier League’s own Key Match Incidents Panel later admitted that West Ham should have been awarded a penalty against Brentford after Tomas Soucek was held in “a clear non-footballing action which impacted the player’s movement.”

But supporters immediately asked the obvious question: How many similar incidents had already been ignored earlier in the season?

That is the central issue.

Referees have spent so long managing corners informally, rather than enforcing the laws properly, that nobody now seems fully clear where the line actually is.

There is also a wider concern for the future of the game itself.

Football tactics evolve around whatever referees allow.

If clubs believe they can gain an advantage from grappling, blocking goalkeepers or illegally restricting runners at corners without being consistently punished, then coaches will inevitably build those methods into their set-piece routines.

That is already beginning to happen.

Modern Premier League football has become increasingly focused on marginal gains and set-pieces are now treated almost like choreographed plays in American football. Analysts spend hours designing blocking movements, screens and physical contests inside the penalty area because they know officials often struggle to police them consistently.

The danger is that football gradually becomes less about quality of delivery, movement and finishing, and more about who can manipulate the grey areas of officiating most effectively.

No supporter wants to see matches increasingly decided by wrestling matches inside the six-yard box rather than genuine footballing ability.

That is why this issue matters so much.

If referees do not establish a clear and consistent standard now, the game itself risks drifting further towards manufactured set-piece chaos where controversy becomes part of the tactic rather than an occasional consequence.

Several incidents across the season highlighted the confusion.

There were repeated controversies involving obstruction of goalkeepers from corners, including incidents where attackers backed into keepers or prevented movement while the ball was delivered. Similar situations sometimes resulted in fouls being given and other times goals standing.

Howard Webb himself later acknowledged that officials had missed some holding offences during the season despite attempts at improved enforcement.

That admission matters because it confirms what supporters have been saying for years: the problem is not isolated mistakes but the lack of a consistent refereeing standard.

The wider VAR debate has only intensified because of this inconsistency.

Many of the season’s biggest controversies were technically classified as “subjective decisions”, meaning they were not always officially recorded as VAR mistakes even though supporters, players and pundits strongly disagreed with them.

That is why trust in officiating has eroded.

But removing VAR alone would not solve the set-piece problem.

The real solution is simpler: referees must start enforcing the laws consistently from the very first match of the season.

If grappling at corners becomes an automatic foul every single time, players will adapt remarkably quickly.

Football has seen this before.

When officials clamped down on tackles from behind, players changed.

When they cracked down on dissent, behaviour changed.

When they enforced goalkeeper time wasting more aggressively, players adapted.

The same would happen at corners.

But consistency is everything.

Players and supporters do not expect perfection. They simply want to know that the same offence will be punished in the same way every week regardless of club, stadium or referee.

At the moment, that confidence simply does not exist.

And unfortunately for PGMOL, that is a problem entirely of their own making.

Source