Choosing between two flagship phones at the same price is never simple, especially when both promise top-tier performance, premium design, and next-gen cameras. The Vivo X300 and OPPO Find X9 sit in the same price bracket, target the same premium buyers, and even share the same chipset. But their priorities are different. One leans heavily into ultra-high-resolution photography and display brightness, while the other focuses on battery endurance and cinematic video features.

For buyers spending around $650 (₹76,000), this comparison matters. The real question isn’t which phone is powerful; both are, but which one better fits daily habits, content style, and long-term usage needs.

Major Features:

Feature	Vivo X300	OPPO Find X9	Winner
Build	Glass front & back, aluminum alloy frame	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame	OPPO – Gorilla Glass 7i + higher Mohs level
Water Resistance	IP68/IP69	IP68/IP69	Tie – Same rating
Display Type	LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz	AMOLED, 120Hz	Vivo – LTPO advantage
Peak Brightness	4500 nits	3600 nits	Vivo – Higher peak brightness
PWM Dimming	2160Hz	3840Hz	OPPO – Higher PWM frequency
HDR Support	HDR10+, HDR Vivid	Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid	OPPO – Adds Dolby Vision
Chipset	Dimensity 9500 (3nm)	Dimensity 9500 (3nm)	Tie – Same chipset
Storage Type	UFS 4.1	UFS 4.1	Tie – Same
Main Camera	200MP (1/1.4″), OIS	50MP (1/1.4″), OIS	Vivo – Higher resolution
Telephoto	50MP 3x periscope	50MP 3x periscope	Tie – Similar specs
Ultrawide	50MP	50MP	Tie – Same resolution
Video Features	4K@120fps HDR	4K@120fps, 10-bit, Dolby Vision, LOG	OPPO – More advanced video formats
Selfie Camera	50MP AF	32MP	Vivo – Higher resolution + AF
Bluetooth	5.4	6.0	OPPO – Newer version
Battery (Global)	6040mAh	7025mAh	OPPO – Larger capacity
Wired Charging	90W	80W	Vivo – Faster wired
Wireless Charging	40W	50W	OPPO – Faster wireless
Reverse Wireless	No (reverse wired only)	10W reverse wireless	OPPO – Reverse wireless support
Price	~$650 / ₹76,000	~$650 / ₹76,000	Tie – Same price

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Vivo X300 uses glass on both sides with an aluminum alloy frame and IP68/IP69 protection. It feels sleek and compact, making daily handling easier. The OPPO Find X9 also offers glass and aluminum construction, but adds Gorilla Glass 7i for improved scratch resistance. Both look premium, though Vivo feels more refined while OPPO gives off a sturdier impression.

Display Quality

Vivo offers a 6.31-inch LTPO AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate and an impressive 4500-nit peak brightness. OPPO features a larger 6.59-inch AMOLED display with Dolby Vision, 3840Hz PWM dimming, and 3600-nit peak brightness. Vivo leads in brightness, but OPPO’s Dolby Vision and higher PWM dimming enhance media comfort.

Verdict

Vivo wins for brightness and compact feel, while OPPO offers better durability and cinematic display support.

Specifications 

Performance

Both phones run Android 16 on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) with up to 1TB UFS 4.1 storage. Performance, gaming, and multitasking should feel equally smooth. With five major Android updates promised, longevity is strong on both sides. Real-world speed differences will be minimal.

Battery and Charging

OPPO clearly leads in battery capacity with 7025mAh and 80W wired plus 50W wireless charging. Vivo offers 6040mAh (global) with faster 90W wired and 40W wireless charging. Vivo charges slightly faster, but OPPO should last longer on a single charge. Endurance matters more for heavy users.

Verdict

Performance is tied, but OPPO takes this section due to its significantly larger battery.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

Vivo features a 200MP main camera with Zeiss optics, supported by 50MP telephoto and ultrawide lenses. It focuses on extreme detail and sharpness. OPPO uses three 50MP sensors with Hasselblad color tuning and supports 10-bit LOG and Dolby Vision video. Vivo feels sharper for photos, while OPPO is stronger for professional-style video.

Selfie Camera

Vivo includes a 50MP autofocus selfie camera with 4K recording. OPPO offers a 32MP front camera with 4K support but no autofocus. Vivo delivers better clarity and focus for selfies.

Verdict

Vivo is better for high-resolution photography and selfies. OPPO is better for advanced video creators.

Pricing

Both phones are priced around $650 (₹76,000). At this level, buyers expect flagship performance and premium features. Vivo justifies the price with a 200MP camera and ultra-bright display. OPPO counters with a massive battery and Dolby Vision support. The value depends on whether camera detail or battery life is the priority.

Verdict

Both offer strong value, but OPPO offers slightly more hardware advantages at the same price.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Vivo stands out with its 200MP camera, Zeiss optics, and brighter LTPO display. OPPO distinguishes itself with a 7025mAh battery, Dolby Vision display and video, and Hasselblad color calibration. Vivo feels photography-focused, while OPPO feels built for endurance and multimedia.

Final Verdict

Overall, the OPPO Find X9 is the better choice. It matches Vivo in performance, delivers longer battery life, supports advanced video features, and maintains flagship display quality at the same price. Vivo remains an excellent option for photography lovers, but OPPO offers a more balanced package for most users.

---

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Watch Ultra: Which One Makes More Sense (Especially With US Discounts)
• Vivo X300 Max vs Xiaomi 17 Max: Two mega flagships gearing up for a camera and battery showdown
• OnePlus 15 vs Realme GT 8 Pro: Same Chip, Very Different Flagship Experience

The post Vivo X300 vs OPPO Find X9: Same Price, But One Clearly Wins appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• Apple has reportedly acquired Israeli AI startup Q.ai for ~$2 billion.
  
• Future AirPods could enable silent, lip-based interaction.
  
• The move signals Apple’s deeper push into AI-powered wearable interfaces.
  

---

Apple is reportedly exploring a future where users can interact with devices without speaking. According to reports from Financial Times and Reuters, the company has acquired Israeli startup Q.ai for approximately $2 billion, its largest deal since acquiring Beats Electronics.

Q.ai specializes in machine learning systems that analyze micro-movements in facial skin, lip motions, and subtle muscle activity. The technology can detect silently mouthed words, emotional expressions, and even physiological indicators like heart rate and breathing patterns.

Industry analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has previously predicted camera-enabled AirPods could launch in 2026, potentially featuring infrared sensors similar to Face ID’s depth-mapping system. Combined with Q.ai’s algorithms, such hardware could allow users to send messages, activate Siri, or control music without saying a word.

The technology may also extend beyond earbuds to devices like Apple Vision Pro and future smart glasses. Q.ai’s founder, Aviad Maizels, previously co-founded PrimeSense, whose 3D sensing technology later evolved into Apple’s Face ID system.

If implemented, silent facial input could mark a shift from voice commands to discreet, sensor-based interaction, reshaping how users engage with wearable AI while raising new privacy questions.

Privacy Questions:

Silent facial tracking raises significant privacy considerations. Continuous monitoring of lip and muscle movements could generate highly sensitive biometric data. If stored improperly, such data might reveal emotional states, health indicators, or private communications. There are also concerns about potential misuse, including unauthorized tracking or remote intent detection.

If implemented, silent facial input could redefine human-computer interaction, while intensifying the debate over how much data wearable devices should be allowed to observe.

Read More:

• No Humans on Stage: Inside the World’s First Robot-Led Live Event by AGIBOT
• China’s ByteDance & Alibaba Take on Google’s Nano Banana in AI Image War
• Why Elon Musk Wants to Build an AI Factory on the Moon?

The post Say Goodbye to “Hey Siri”: Apple’s Silent AI Is Coming, And It Can Read Your Lips appeared first on Gizmochina.

Highlights:

• Elon Musk proposed building a Moon factory to produce AI-powered satellites.
  
• The plan includes launching satellites using an electromagnetic “Mass Drive” system.
  
• The proposal comes as xAI faces leadership exits and possible IPO pressure.

---

• Elon Musk has proposed building a factory on the Moon to manufacture AI-powered satellites, according to a February 10 report by The New York Times. Musk shared the idea during an internal xAI meeting, suggesting that lunar infrastructure could unlock computing power far beyond today’s limits.

The concept includes a giant electromagnetic catapult, often described as a “mass driver,” that would launch satellites into space from the Moon’s lower-gravity environment. Musk reportedly argued that future AI systems will require unprecedented computing capacity and that Earth alone may not be enough.

The proposal expands on Musk’s broader space-AI strategy following the merger of xAI and SpaceX. The long-term vision includes building a self-sustaining Moon city, then moving toward Mars colonization and eventually interstellar exploration. However, no timeline or construction roadmap was shared.

The timing is notable. xAI, founded in 2023 and known for its Grok chatbot integrated into X, is reportedly facing internal leadership changes. Investors are said to be focused on near-term growth and a potential IPO within 18–24 months. Meanwhile, SpaceX is also preparing for a possible public offering.

Musk recently claimed X has about 600 million monthly active users, though the number has not been independently verified.

While supporters see bold innovation, critics question whether now is the right moment for such an ambitious lunar pivot.

Why Moon Has Advantages for an AI Factory?

• Lower gravity makes it easier and cheaper to launch satellites into space.
• No atmosphere means fewer weather delays during launches.
• Abundant solar energy with long periods of sunlight.
• Large open space for building massive facilities.
• Fewer environmental regulations compared to Earth.
• Potential access to lunar resources for construction materials.
• Cooler space environment could help with heat management for data systems.
• Less risk of natural disasters like earthquakes or storms.
• Strategic position for launching satellites into deep space.

Read More:

• China’s ByteDance & Alibaba Take on Google’s Nano Banana in AI Image War
• No Humans on Stage: Inside the World’s First Robot-Led Live Event by AGIBOT
• Leak Claims 100MP Front Camera and Dual 200MP Setup for Ultra Flagship Phone

(via)

The post Why Elon Musk Wants to Build an AI Factory on the Moon? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Highlights:

• ByteDance launches Seedream 5.0 with advanced image editing and lower pricing.
  
• Alibaba unveils Qwen-Image-2.0, supporting 1K-token prompts and 2K images.
  
• Both models directly challenge Google’s Nano Banana Pro amid rising US-China AI rivalry.

---

China’s tech giants are accelerating the global AI race. ByteDance and Alibaba Cloud have introduced new image-generation models designed to compete with Google’s Nano Banana Pro.

The launches highlight growing competition between China and the United States in creative AI tools. Both companies aim to lower costs while improving performance for businesses and individual creators.

ByteDance’s Seedream 5.0 is now available for beta testing on Jimeng in China and on CapCut globally. The company says the model has stronger reasoning skills and a better understanding of complex prompts.

It allows users to edit specific parts of an image without regenerating the entire design. In one test, a “snowy night” scene was created and later modified by switching lights on and off, while keeping the rest unchanged.

The launch follows ByteDance’s recent Seedance 2.0 AI video model, which focuses on realistic AI-generated videos.

Alibaba Cloud’s Qwen-Image-2.0 combines image generation and editing in a single system. It supports up to 1,000-token prompts and produces 2K-resolution images.

The model can handle structured layouts, multi-panel designs, and consistent characters across scenes. It also performs strongly in rendering Chinese text and complex calligraphy.

Together, these launches position both firms as serious global competitors in AI-powered creative tools.

Major Features Compared:

Feature	ByteDance Seedream 5.0	Alibaba Qwen-Image 2.0	Google Nano Banana Pro
Developer	ByteDance	Alibaba Cloud (Qwen team)	Google DeepMind (Gemini)
Core Function	Text-to-image generation + editing	Unified image generation + editing	Image generation + advanced editing
Native Output Resolution	Supports 2K and 4K outputs	Native 2K (2048×2048) output	Up to 4K resolution output
Prompt Handling	Designed for detailed prompt understanding	Supports long prompts (up to ~1K tokens)	Advanced prompt-based generation (no official token limit stated)
Text Rendering	Generates legible text within images	Strong typography and structured text rendering	Advanced multilingual text rendering
Generation + Editing Integration	Supports selective image edits	Generation and editing integrated in one model	Integrated image creation and editing tools
Availability	Beta testing via Jimeng (China) and CapCut (global)	Available via Qwen platforms	Available through Gemini apps and Google AI tools
Model Base / Engine	Proprietary Seedream model	Qwen multimodal architecture	Built on Gemini 3 Pro Image

Read More:

• No Humans on Stage: Inside the World’s First Robot-Led Live Event by AGIBOT
• Xiaomi Adds Fireworks, Gestures, and Big Camera Upgrades to the 17 Pro Series
• Leak Claims 100MP Front Camera and Dual 200MP Setup for Ultra Flagship Phone

(via)

The post China’s ByteDance & Alibaba Take on Google’s Nano Banana in AI Image War appeared first on Gizmochina.

Bluetooth audio has evolved far beyond simply connecting earbuds to smartphones. In 2026, it powers televisions, cars, laptops, gaming systems, and home entertainment setups. What was once a convenience feature is now the backbone of modern wireless sound. As this shift accelerates, brands that deliver practical and affordable solutions like Faster Speakers are becoming increasingly important.

From Wires to Wireless Living

Traditional audio systems came with long cables, complicated installations, and limited flexibility. Rearranging a room meant rearranging wires. Adding speakers required effort and compatibility checks. Bluetooth eliminated these everyday frustrations.

Today, users expect seamless pairing, automatic reconnection, and clean setups without clutter. Faster Speakers fit directly into this lifestyle by offering simple, user-friendly wireless audio designed for everyday use, not technical complexity.

2026: A Major Upgrade in Bluetooth Technology

Recent improvements such as Bluetooth LE Audio, the LC3 codec, multi-stream audio, and broadcast audio have significantly improved sound efficiency and clarity. These upgrades allow better audio quality at lower power consumption while enabling multiple device connections at once.

For brands like Faster, these advancements mean delivering reliable performance, strong battery life, and stable connectivity at accessible price points, making modern Bluetooth benefits available to more users.

Wireless Sound at Home, in Cars, and at Work

Bluetooth is now standard in cars for hands-free calling and music streaming. In homes, it allows wireless TV-to-headphone connections and clutter-free speaker setups. In hybrid work environments, stable Bluetooth audio ensures smoother meetings and easy device switching.

Faster Speakers align with this multi-device world. Designed for portability, travel, outdoor use, and home entertainment, they provide practical solutions without overwhelming users with unnecessary features.

Real-World Reliability Over Technical Specs

Today’s buyers prioritize quick pairing, consistent connection strength, long battery life, easy controls, and dependable after-sales support. Technical bitrate numbers matter less than real-world performance.

This is where Faster stands out. By focusing on everyday reliability and affordability, the brand addresses what users actually need, wireless sound that works consistently.

The Bigger Picture

Global Bluetooth device shipments crossed 5 billion in 2023 and continue to rise. The Bluetooth speaker market alone sold hundreds of millions of units recently, proving that wireless sound is now the default choice.

As Bluetooth becomes invisible, seamless infrastructure, brands like Faster Speakers play a key role in making that technology accessible. Wireless audio is no longer optional, and practical, reliable speakers are at the center of this transformation.

How to Choose the Right Bluetooth Device?

• Bluetooth Version 5.2 or newer – Better stability, range, and efficiency.
• Support for modern codecs (like LC3) – Clearer sound with lower battery usage.
• Multi-device pairing – Easy switching between phone, laptop, and tablet.
• Strong battery life – Longer playback and fewer charging interruptions.
• Stable connectivity – Performs well even in crowded wireless environments.
• Low latency support – Important for gaming and video streaming.
• Comfort and build quality – Especially for earbuds and headphones.
• Simple controls – Easy buttons or touch controls for daily use.
• Reliable warranty & support – Ensures long-term peace of mind.

The post Bluetooth Audio Beyond Phones: Why Faster Speakers Matter More Than Ever appeared first on Gizmochina.

Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 and the Galaxy Watch Ultra isn’t just about specs; it’s about lifestyle. One is designed for everyday comfort and smart health tracking, while the other targets extreme durability and outdoor performance. With limited-time discounts currently live for US customers, the decision becomes even more relevant right now. This comparison breaks down where each watch truly excels, helping buyers decide whether sleek practicality or rugged endurance offers better value during the ongoing deal window.

Major Features:

Feature	Galaxy Watch 8	Galaxy Watch Ultra	Winner
Build & Materials	Aluminum frame, lighter	Titanium frame, rugged build	Watch Ultra – More durable premium materials
Comfort & Wearability	Lighter & slimmer	Heavier & bulkier	Watch 8 – Better for all-day wear
Display Brightness	~3000 nits peak	Bright but lower peak	Watch 8 – Stronger outdoor visibility
Sensor Suite	BioActive with antioxidant index	BioActive + water temp	Watch Ultra – Extra water temp sensor
Fitness & Outdoor Tracking	Strong daily fitness	Better for strenuous/outdoor	Watch Ultra – Geared toward adventurers
Software & Performance	Wear OS 6 out of box	Wear OS 5 → OS 6	Watch 8 – Newer OS preloaded
Storage Options	32GB	32GB or 64GB	Watch Ultra – More storage choice
Battery Capacity	435 mAh	590 mAh	Watch Ultra – Longer life, especially with GPS
Connectivity (GPS/Bluetooth/LTE)	Same on both	Same on both	Tie – No real difference
Daily Usability	Better everyday comfort	Better for rugged use	Tie – Depends on lifestyle
Value (Price vs Features)	~$260	~$380	Watch 8 – Better bang for most users
Overall	Balanced & accessible	Rugged & long-lasting	Watch 8 (General) – Best overall choice for most

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Design and Display

Build & Comfort

Galaxy Watch 8 focuses on comfort and daily usability. Its slim aluminum body and lighter weight make it easy to wear all day and comfortable during sleep. The flatter design also fits better under sleeves, giving it a clean, classic smartwatch feel.

Galaxy Watch Ultra, on the other hand, prioritizes durability. Its titanium frame and thicker build feel extremely solid, but the added weight is noticeable during long wear. It feels more like an outdoor instrument than a lifestyle accessory. Both meet MIL-STD-810H standards, but the Ultra’s materials inspire more confidence in harsh conditions.

Display Brightness & Visibility

Watch 8 stands out with a 3000-nit peak brightness, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. The Ultra’s display remains sharp and colorful, but doesn’t match the same brightness advantage.

Verdict

Watch 8 favors comfort and visibility, while Watch Ultra is built for toughness over elegance.

Health and Fitness Tracking

Sensors & Tracking Accuracy

Both watches share Samsung’s BioActive sensor suite, delivering accurate heart rate, SpO₂, ECG, and sleep data. The Watch 8 adds an antioxidant index, leaning more toward wellness insights. The Watch Ultra counters with water temperature tracking, clearly targeting swimmers and outdoor users. For everyday health tracking, accuracy remains largely similar across both.

Workout Modes

Workout support is strong on both models, with automatic detection and detailed post-activity stats. The Watch Ultra feels better suited for long hikes, swimming, and endurance workouts due to its rugged build and larger battery. The Watch 8 comfortably handles gym sessions, runs, and daily fitness routines without feeling excessive.

Verdict

Watch 8 is ideal for daily health tracking, while Watch Ultra shines in demanding fitness environments.

Performance and Software

UI Smoothness

Both watches run on the Exynos W1000 (3nm) chipset with 2GB RAM, resulting in smooth navigation and fast app launches. Every day performance feels identical, even during multitasking. Watch 8 ships with Wear OS 6, giving it a slight head start in software longevity.

App Support & Features

App support remains the same across both, including Google apps, Samsung Health, LTE calling, and payments. The Ultra’s higher storage option benefits users who store offline music or maps, though most users may not need it. Software polish is consistent and mature on both devices.

Verdict

Performance is evenly matched, with Watch 8 gaining a small edge thanks to newer software out of the box.

Battery and Connectivity

Battery Life

Battery life is a clear advantage for the Watch Ultra. Its 590 mAh battery lasts noticeably longer, especially with GPS or LTE usage. The Watch 8 delivers reliable one-day battery life but requires more frequent charging. Both support 10W wireless charging.

GPS, Bluetooth, LTE

Connectivity options are identical, including dual-frequency GPS, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and eSIM. GPS accuracy and call reliability are consistent on both models, even in challenging environments.

Verdict

Watch Ultra wins on battery endurance, while Watch 8 is sufficient for regular daily use.

Pricing

At around $259.99, the Galaxy Watch 8 offers strong value with flagship-level features at a more accessible price. The Galaxy Watch Ultra, priced at $379, justifies its cost through premium materials and longer battery life rather than added software features. The price gap is significant and only makes sense for users who need extra durability.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Best For Whom

Galaxy Watch 8 is best for users who want a lightweight, comfortable smartwatch focused on daily health and fitness. Galaxy Watch Ultra is designed for outdoor enthusiasts, swimmers, and users who prioritize durability and battery life.

Final Verdict

Galaxy Watch 8 delivers a better all-around experience for most users, while Galaxy Watch Ultra is a powerful but more specialized option.

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Read More:

• Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Watch 7: Same Look, Different Features
• OnePlus 15 vs Realme GT 8 Pro: Same Chip, Very Different Flagship Experience
• Redmi Note 15 Series Comparison: Differences, Upgrades, and Which to Buy

The post Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 vs Watch Ultra: Which One Makes More Sense (Especially With US Discounts) appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• 100MP selfie test: A 100MP front camera is being tested, a possible industry first.
  
• Dual 200MP rear cameras: The prototype includes 200MP main and 200MP telephoto sensors.
  
• Impact still unclear: Real benefits will depend on software, heat control, and processing power.

---

According to a well-known Chinese tipster, Digital Chat Station, a major smartphone brand is testing an extreme camera setup for its next ultra-flagship phone. The prototype reportedly features a 200MP main rear camera, a 200MP telephoto camera, and a 100MP front-facing camera. If released, the 100MP selfie camera would be an industry first.

The leak notes that the device uses a custom small-pixel sensor solution and is still in early testing, meaning the final hardware may change before launch. The manufacturer’s identity was not revealed, but commenters speculate it could be OPPO or vivo.

This development is notable because front cameras have seen far fewer upgrades compared to rear cameras. A 100MP selfie sensor could significantly improve video calls, live streaming, vlogging, and social media content creation, areas where smartphones are increasingly replacing dedicated cameras. However, challenges such as processing load, heat, storage demands, and real-world image quality could limit how transformative such high resolutions actually are.

Industry trends already point toward dual 200MP rear camera systems becoming common in future flagships. At the same time, companies like Huawei, OPPO, and vivo are reportedly experimenting with new front-camera sensor formats.

For now, all details remain unconfirmed, but the testing hints at where smartphone imaging could be heading next.

Read More:

• Xiaomi Adds Fireworks, Gestures, and Big Camera Upgrades to the 17 Pro Series
• China Flies World’s First 5-Ton, 10-Passenger eVTOL, Raising the Bar for Air Taxis
• China’s Top EV Maker BYD Sues U.S. Government: Challenges Trump-Era Tariffs
• No Humans on Stage: Inside the World’s First Robot-Led Live Event by AGIBOT

(via)

The post Leak Claims 100MP Front Camera and Dual 200MP Setup for Ultra Flagship Phone appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• New Spring Festival features add countdowns, animated fireworks, and gesture controls to the rear display
  
• Major camera upgrades improve video recording, night scenes, and creative shooting modes
  
• Festive back screen features are exclusive to the China-only Xiaomi 17 Pro series

---

Xiaomi has announced a new Spring Festival software update for its Xiaomi 17 Pro series, introducing festive back screen functions along with a range of camera enhancements. The update is scheduled to roll out in mid-February.

One of the main additions is a set of Lunar New Year features designed for the phone’s rear secondary display. From Lunar New Year Day 1 through Day 7, the back screen wallpaper will update automatically at midnight each day.

On New Year’s Eve, a countdown animation will begin at 11:55 PM. When midnight is reached, a fireworks animation will automatically play on the rear display.

The update also introduces gesture-controlled interactions. Users can trigger the fireworks animation remotely by making a fist and then opening their hand in front of the back screen, without touching the device.

In addition to festive visuals, Xiaomi is expanding camera capabilities across the Xiaomi 17 series. Intelligent Scene Card support, adapted from the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, improves photo and video capture for fireworks and stage performance scenes.

For video creators, Xiaomi has added LOFIC recording with support for up to 4K at 60 frames per second, enhanced LOG recording with additional LUTs, dual-view recording using both front and rear cameras, and rear-screen full-frame recording for immersive video selfies. Further improvements include better slow-motion performance, enhanced night video, and improved ultra-wide-angle distortion correction.

The new back screen festive features are exclusive to the China-only variant of the Xiaomi 17 Pro series. International users will not receive these features, as the Pro models are not available globally.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Series — Updates:

Spring Festival Back Screen Features

• Daily Lunar New Year wallpapers from Day 1 to Day 7
• New Year’s Eve countdown animation on the rear display
• Fireworks animation triggered automatically at midnight
• Air-gesture control to trigger fireworks without touching the phone
• Features rely on the rear secondary display

Camera Updates

• Intelligent Scene Card support adapted from Xiaomi 17 Ultra
• Dynamic photo capture while recording video
• Enhanced LOG video recording with expanded LUT support
• Customizable camera interface and toolbar layout
• Dual-view recording using front and rear cameras simultaneously
• Improved slow-motion video performance
• Enhanced night-scene video recording
• Improved ultra-wide-angle distortion correction

Camera Features With Explicit Hardware Limits

• LOFIC video recording with support up to 4K at 60fps
• Rear-screen full-frame video selfie recording

Read More:

• China Flies World’s First 5-Ton, 10-Passenger eVTOL, Raising the Bar for Air Taxis
• No Humans on Stage: Inside the World’s First Robot-Led Live Event by AGIBOT
• Humans For Hire: This Website Lets AI Rent Humans For Work

(via)

The post Xiaomi Adds Fireworks, Gestures, and Big Camera Upgrades to the 17 Pro Series appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• China has unveiled the world’s first 5-ton-class passenger eVTOL
  
• The V5000 completed a full conversion flight, proving the large eVTOL’s feasibility
  
• It can carry 10 passengers and fly up to 1500 km in hybrid mode
  

---

World’s First 5-Ton eVTOL Takes Flight

China has reached a major aviation milestone with the successful flight of the world’s first 5-ton electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, the V5000. The aircraft completed a full conversion flight at the Kunshan Civil Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Test Flight Operation Base in Jiangsu Province, smoothly transitioning from vertical takeoff to fixed-wing cruise and back to vertical landing. The flight was confirmed by local authorities, marking a breakthrough for large-scale eVTOL development.

From Concept to Large-Scale Air Taxi

The V5000 Sky Dragon was independently developed by Fengfei Aviation Technology, while the passenger-focused V5000 Matrix was unveiled by AutoFlight. Unlike most eVTOLs in service today, which weigh under 3 tons and carry fewer than six passengers, the V5000 enters a new class. It seats 10 passengers or carries multi-ton cargo, showing that eVTOLs can scale beyond small urban air taxis.

Design, Range, and Capability

The aircraft uses a compound wing and three-surface aerodynamic layout, powered by up to 20 lift motors. Its high-redundancy design allows safe flight even with motor failures. The pure-electric version offers a 250 km range, while the hybrid variant can reach up to 1,500 km, opening the door to regional routes and logistics missions.

Why This Matters Globally

Leading Western eVTOL developers remain focused on lighter aircraft for short city trips. None have flown a 5-ton-class eVTOL. The V5000 shows China moving faster toward large, practical, multi-role eVTOLs, signaling a shift from experimental air taxis to real aerial transport systems.

Read More:

• China’s Top EV Maker BYD Sues U.S. Government: Challenges Trump-Era Tariffs
• No Humans on Stage: Inside the World’s First Robot-Led Live Event by AGIBOT
• No Humans, Just 16 Claude AI Agents Built a Fully Functional C Compiler, Shocking Developers
• Humans For Hire: This Website Lets AI Rent Humans For Work

(via)

The post China Flies World’s First 5-Ton, 10-Passenger eVTOL, Raising the Bar for Air Taxis appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• BYD has filed a lawsuit challenging U.S. tariffs imposed during Donald Trump’s earlier presidency
  
• The company is seeking refunds for tariffs paid since April 2025
  
• The case could have wider implications for U.S.–China trade and tech tensions

---

Chinese electric vehicle giant BYD has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. government, challenging tariffs that were imposed during Donald Trump’s earlier presidency.

The case was filed on January 26, 2026, in the U.S. Court of International Trade under case number 26-00847, and was publicly disclosed in early February. Four U.S.-based BYD entities: BYD America, BYD Coach & Bus, BYD Energy, and BYD Motors, are listed as plaintiffs. The defendants include several federal agencies, such as U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Treasury Department, and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

BYD argues that the tariffs were imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law that does not explicitly authorize the use of tariffs or border taxes. The company claims this represents an overreach of executive power and is asking the court to declare the measures invalid, block their enforcement, and order refunds of all tariffs paid, along with interest and legal costs.

Beyond BYD, the lawsuit could have broader implications for U.S.–China trade and the ongoing tech rivalry. If the court limits the use of IEEPA for tariffs, it may weaken a key U.S. trade tool and encourage other Chinese firms, especially in batteries, solar, and EV supply chains, to pursue similar legal challenges. Analysts say the case also reflects a shift toward Chinese companies using U.S. courts, rather than diplomacy alone, to challenge trade restrictions.

Read More;

• No Humans on Stage: Inside the World’s First Robot-Led Live Event by AGIBOT
• No Humans, Just 16 Claude AI Agents Built a Fully Functional C Compiler, Shocking Developers
• Humans For Hire: This Website Lets AI Rent Humans For Work

(via)

The post China’s Top EV Maker BYD Sues U.S. Government: Challenges Trump-Era Tariffs appeared first on Gizmochina.