Normal view

Today — 23 February 2026Main stream

India Resumes Strictly Regulated Safari Operations in Bandipur and Nagarahole Reserves, Boosting Eco-Tourism and Protecting Wildlife: Everything You Need to Know

23 February 2026 at 07:00
India Resumes Strictly Regulated Safari Operations in Bandipur and Nagarahole Reserves, Boosting Eco-Tourism and Protecting Wildlife: Everything You Need to Know

India has resumed strictly regulated safari operations in Bandipur and Nagarahole Tiger Reserves in Karnataka after a temporary suspension, in response to rising safety concerns and the need for wildlife protection. This restart, aimed at boosting eco-tourism and protecting wildlife, follows a careful reassessment of the balance between tourism and conservation efforts. The suspension, initiated due to rising incidents of human–tiger conflict and other environmental concerns, prompted the Karnataka Forest Department to introduce tight guidelines to ensure that safari activities do not disrupt wildlife or put visitors at risk. The phased reopening includes stricter controls on vehicle capacities, improved monitoring systems, and heightened safety measures for both animals and tourists. This approach aims to not only rejuvenate the local economy, which depends heavily on tourism, but also to safeguard the integrity of these vital ecosystems. As the situation evolves, the authorities will continue to evaluate and refine safari operations, making sure that tourism in these reserves supports both conservation goals and the well-being of local communities.

Why Safaris Were Suspended: Rising Safety and Conservation Concerns

The safari suspension took effect after several incidents of human–tiger conflict in regions bordering the reserves, leading to serious injuries and fatalities among villagers. The Karnataka State Board for Wildlife responded by recommending a halt to operations in November 2025 to address safety and environmental concerns. Authorities noted that while tiger numbers have increased over decades, this has heightened interactions with nearby communities, prompting a temporary pause for reassessment.

During the closure, forest officials and wildlife experts analysed the impact of safari tourism on wildlife behaviour, habitat stress, and human safety. A technical expert panel was formed by the government to study vehicle carrying capacities, visitor pressure, and conflict‑prone zones before recommending a safe way forward.

Gradual Resumption: Balancing Tourism and Wildlife Safety

This phased strategy reflects a cautious approach, designed to monitor and manage wildlife movement while enabling partial tourism activity. Officials have emphasised that any breach of the new guidelines will make responsible staff directly accountable, underlining the priority given to conservation and visitor safety.

Stricter Guidelines and Safety Measures for Visitors

The newly implemented guidelines require careful identification of conflict‑prone areas within the reserves where enhanced patrolling and prevention measures have been introduced. These provisions aim to ensure that wildlife does not stray into human settlements and that visitors experience the safari with minimal risk.

In addition to vehicle limitations, the forest department is introducing advanced monitoring tools, including thermal drone surveillance, e‑patrolling software, and integrated command monitoring systems, to track wildlife movement in real time. This technological integration is a first for safari operations in the region and reflects a stronger commitment to wildlife protection and risk mitigation.

Community Benefits: Boosting Tourism and Local Livelihoods

Safari tourism has historically been a key part of the local economy around Bandipur and Nagarahole, supporting thousands of jobs in hospitality, guiding, transportation, and allied services. During the suspension, nearby resorts and businesses witnessed steep drops in occupancy and revenue, as tourists diverted to other wildlife destinations like Ranthambore and Jim Corbett National Park.

The phased reopening is expected to revive these local economies gradually. Forest officials have also proposed that a portion of safari revenues be directed toward community development initiatives—such as youth skill training, fodder supply, and education support for villages bordering the reserves. This community‑centric approach aims to build positive engagement between residents and forest protection efforts.

Managing Conflict‑Prone Zones and Protecting Wildlife

Human–wildlife conflict remains a priority concern for Karnataka’s wildlife management authorities. To mitigate conflict, key sensitive stretches of forest land—especially a 100‑kilometre belt along the Bandipur boundary—have been identified for focused monitoring. Camps staffed by trained local volunteers, termed “forest friends,” have been established at regular intervals to help report animal movement and alert officials when necessary.

Active patrolling has been intensified in areas where wildlife has historically moved outside core habitats, ensuring that both human residents and animals are kept safe. Officials have reiterated that safari operations will continue only with strict adherence to guidelines that protect ecological balance.

Responding to Tourism Sector and Local Pressure

The move to resume safaris follows mounting pressure from tourism stakeholders, who argued that continued suspension was harming livelihoods and sidelining conservation‑compatible tourism. Associations representing travel operators and resort owners had highlighted that reduced safari activity was not only affecting revenue but also impacting India’s broader reputation as a wildlife tourism destination.

By implementing a balanced and phased approach, the government seeks to uphold conservation imperatives while supporting sustainable tourism. The expert panel’s recommendations are expected to guide future policy decisions on expanding operations as safety conditions permit.

Eco‑Tourism’s Future: Conservation and Responsible Travel

The reopening of safari operations in Karnataka represents a nuanced attempt to integrate conservation priorities with tourism and economic needs. While human–wildlife conflicts had previously raised serious safety concerns, authorities now believe that carefully regulated safari activity can coexist with ecological protection goals.

Forest officials emphasise that tourism must be conducted in a way that does not disturb animal habitats or disrupt natural behaviours. The introduction of advanced tracking technologies and ground‑level monitoring underscores a shift toward smarter, data‑driven wildlife management.

Conclusion: A Measured Return to Wildlife Tourism

India has made a cautious yet measured return to wildlife tourism, with strictly regulated safari operations resuming in Karnataka’s Bandipur and Nagarahole reserves. This resumption comes after a suspension that was necessary to address rising safety concerns, wildlife protection, and human–animal conflict. The phased reopening, under strict guidelines, aims to balance tourism with conservation efforts, ensuring minimal disturbance to wildlife while benefiting local economies. The introduction of advanced monitoring tools and reduced vehicle capacity reflects the government’s commitment to responsible tourism, making sure that the integrity of the ecosystem is preserved. With a strong emphasis on community engagement and wildlife protection, the reopening represents a significant milestone for Karnataka’s eco-tourism, ensuring that tourism and conservation can coexist for years to come.

The post India Resumes Strictly Regulated Safari Operations in Bandipur and Nagarahole Reserves, Boosting Eco-Tourism and Protecting Wildlife: Everything You Need to Know appeared first on Travel And Tour World.
Yesterday — 22 February 2026Main stream

Hong Kong Joins China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines in Urging Better Protection as Greenpeace Alerts Environmental Risks Due to Tourism Surge in Sai Kung Country Park in 2026: All You Need to Know

22 February 2026 at 17:30
Hong Kong Joins China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines in Urging Better Protection as Greenpeace Alerts Environmental Risks Due to Tourism Surge in Sai Kung Country Park in 2026: All You Need to Know

The surge in tourism at Sai Kung Country Park in 2026 has prompted Greenpeace to alert about the environmental risks arising from overcrowding. As Hong Kong, China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines, join efforts, better protection is urgently needed to preserve this natural gem from the growing pressures of mass tourism.

In 2026, Sai Kung Country Park in Hong Kong experienced a surge in tourism, drawing attention from environmental advocates like Greenpeace, who have raised alarms about the growing environmental risks. The park, known for its pristine beaches, rugged trails, and diverse wildlife, has become a hotspot for both local and international visitors, especially from Hong Kong, China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines. While the influx of tourists is beneficial for the local economy, it also brings significant environmental challenges. Increased footfall has led to waste buildup, habitat degradation, and threats to biodiversity. In response, Hong Kong, along with other countries, has joined the call for better protection of the park, emphasizing the need for stronger regulations and sustainable tourism practices. Greenpeace has highlighted the urgency of addressing the environmental risks posed by overtourism, urging authorities to implement measures that will balance visitor enjoyment with the preservation of Sai Kung’s unique ecosystems. This collaboration between nations underscores the global concern for protecting Hong Kong’s natural heritage for future generations.

Why Sai Kung Country Park Is So Popular

Sai Kung’s appeal lies in its diverse outdoor offerings — from smooth, sandy beaches and forest‑lined trails to rugged outcrops and waterfront views. Popular locations such as Tai Long Wan, Ham Tin Wan, Sharp Peak, and the scenic segments of the MacLehose Trail draw hikers, campers, beachgoers, and nature photographers.

According to official AFCD resources, these areas provide rare opportunities for residents and tourists alike to explore unspoiled nature in contrast to Hong Kong’s dense urban areas. The park’s scenic value is also reflected within parts of the Hong Kong UNESCO Global Geopark, recognized for its unique geological structures and coastal landscapes.

Tourism Growth Comes With Environmental Concerns

While the scenic beauty of Sai Kung boosts its popularity, the sudden increase in footfall over recent months has led to mounting environmental pressures. Visitor numbers now regularly exceed what some park facilities were designed to handle. This has resulted in waste buildup, overflowing rubbish bins, trampling of vegetation, and unregulated campfires in sensitive areas.

In response, Greenpeace East Asia and other environmental advocates have raised alarms about the threat this overtourism presents to habitats and biodiversity. They warn that unmanaged visitor activities can stress soil, damage plant life, and disturb wildlife — undermining the ecological integrity that the park was intended to protect.

Hong Kong’s official environmental policy emphasizes responsible park use, and the AFCD often stresses that visitors should follow principles of “Leave No Trace” while enjoying park facilities. The department also enforces regulations under the Country Parks Ordinance, which prohibit littering, illegal fires, and other harmful conduct in protected areas.

Government Regulations and Park Management

Sai Kung Country Park is governed under Hong Kong’s Country Parks Ordinance and related legal frameworks, which set out guidelines for recreational use alongside conservation responsibilities. The AFCD issues permits for camping and oversees trail upkeep and visitor education. Visitors are encouraged to respect posted park rules and abide by safety notices, especially during peak periods.

Legal penalties exist for violating country park regulations, including fines for littering or unauthorised environmental impact. According to Hong Kong government fact sheets, fines can be significant for repeat offences or severe violations, reflecting the government’s commitment to protecting these natural assets.

Government sources also emphasize that park management includes proactive measures such as trail maintenance, waste removal, ranger patrols, and public education campaigns. These efforts aim to balance visitor enjoyment with preservation of sensitive ecosystems.

Calls for Enhanced Visitor Management

Despite legal frameworks and park stewardship efforts, environmental organizations argue that current approaches are insufficient in the face of surging demand. They advocate for additional measures such as:

  • Visitor caps or reservation systems at particularly busy sites;
  • Improved waste management infrastructure at beaches and trailheads;
  • Stronger transport coordination to better distribute visitor pressure;
  • More educational outreach encouraging responsible behavior.

These recommendations align with sustainable tourism strategies seen in protected areas worldwide, emphasizing the need to manage visitation without undermining conservation goals.

How Visitors Can Help Protect Sai Kung’s Environment

As part of sustained efforts to preserve the park, environmental advocates and government experts alike recommend that visitors:

  • Plan ahead and check AFCD guidance before traveling to park sites;
  • Carry out all rubbish and avoid leaving waste behind;
  • Minimize impacts on vegetation and wildlife by staying on marked trails;
  • Avoid making open fires or damaging campsites outside designated areas;

By adopting responsible habits, visitors can help ensure that Sai Kung’s natural beauty remains intact for future generations.

The surge in tourism at Sai Kung Country Park in 2026 has raised significant environmental concerns in China. Greenpeace has sounded the alarm over the increasing strain on the park’s ecosystems, highlighting the risks of overcrowding and environmental degradation. As visitor numbers from China and beyond continue to rise, stronger conservation efforts are essential. Greenpeace urges better protection of this natural area through stricter regulations, better waste management, and sustainable tourism practices. Balancing the influx of tourists with the preservation of the park’s unique ecosystems is crucial to ensuring that Sai Kung remains a vital and protected destination for future generations.

Balancing Outdoor Enjoyment With Nature Protection

The rising influx of visitors to Sai Kung Country Park in 2026 highlights the dual challenge of fostering public access to nature while safeguarding ecologically sensitive areas. As tourism grows, constructive collaboration between government bodies, environmental organizations, and park users will be essential in creating sustainable solutions.

Ultimately, the goal is to maintain Sai Kung’s reputation as one of Hong Kong’s most treasured natural landscapes, not just as a recreational destination but as a protected ecosystem whose beauty and biodiversity endure.

The surge in tourism at Sai Kung Country Park in 2026 has prompted Greenpeace to alert environmental risks, urging better protection. With growing footfall, stricter visitor management and sustainable practices are vital to preserve the park’s fragile ecosystems.

Conclusion: What is Being Done

Hong Kong joins China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines, in urging better protection of Sai Kung Country Park due to the environmental risks caused by the tourism surge in 2026. The park’s unique natural beauty, from its beaches to forest trails, has attracted an increasing number of visitors. However, this growth has resulted in mounting pressures on the park’s ecosystems, including waste buildup, habitat disturbance, and damage to vegetation. Greenpeace and environmental advocates have raised alarms about the detrimental effects of overtourism, emphasising that the park’s ecological integrity is at risk.

Countries like Hong Kong, along with China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines, are now calling for stronger measures to balance tourism with conservation efforts. With proper management, including visitor caps, improved waste management, and better infrastructure, it is possible to protect the park’s natural heritage. These nations understand the need for sustainable tourism practices to ensure that Sai Kung Country Park remains a vital destination for future generations. The collaboration between governments, environmental groups, and park users is crucial to finding a solution that preserves the park while allowing people to experience its beauty responsibly.

The post Hong Kong Joins China, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia and Philippines in Urging Better Protection as Greenpeace Alerts Environmental Risks Due to Tourism Surge in Sai Kung Country Park in 2026: All You Need to Know appeared first on Travel And Tour World.
❌
❌