Reading view

Balancer Protocol Sees $70M Exit In Suspected Crypto Exploit

Balancer, one of the most established decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols with more than $700 million in total value locked (TVL), appears to have suffered a serious exploit, adding fresh stress to an industry still grappling with security concerns. Early on-chain evidence indicates that attackers drained assets across multiple chains, with losses now exceeding $98 million, making this one of the largest DeFi breaches of 2025 so far.

The attack appears to have targeted Balancer liquidity pools, siphoning high-value assets including wrapped ETH and liquid-staking derivatives through coordinated cross-chain movements. Initial wallet traces show funds rapidly routed through mixing services and bridge networks. This suggests a sophisticated operation designed to minimize traceability.

Balancer Hacker Portfolio | Source: Lookonchain

This is not the first time Balancer has faced a security incident, and the scale of this exploit reignites conversations around protocol hardening, liquidity pool design risk, and cross-chain attack vectors. It also deals a blow to market confidence at a time when institutional interest in DeFi infrastructure has been slowly recovering.

Over $98M in ETH-Based Assets Drained as Market Weakness Adds Pressure

According to on-chain data compiled by Lookonchain, the Balancer exploit resulted in the loss of a significant amount of high-value Ethereum-based assets. Among the stolen funds were 6,587 WETH (worth approximately $24.46 million), 6,851 osETH (valued around $26.86 million), and 4,260 wstETH (roughly $19.27 million). These figures confirm that the attacker targeted core liquidity holdings, particularly liquid-staking assets and wrapped Ether. Assets commonly used in advanced DeFi strategies and institutional portfolios.

Balancer Vault Transfers | Source: Etherescan

The scale of outflows highlights the exploit’s severity and underscores persistent vulnerabilities in cross-chain and liquidity-pool architecture. More importantly, this incident has arrived at a sensitive moment for the market. Ethereum is already under selling pressure, struggling to reclaim key levels amid broader crypto market weakness. Risk appetite has thinned, liquidity has become more selective, and sentiment remains fragile following recent volatility.

The Balancer breach adds another layer of stress to an ecosystem trying to regain its footing. Major exploits like this serve as a stark reminder that smart-contract risk remains one of the sector’s biggest challenges. With investors already cautious, the timing amplifies uncertainty — and the market’s reaction in the coming days will be a critical test for confidence across the Ethereum and DeFi landscape.

Balancer (BAL) Trades Near Cycle Lows as Sellers Maintain Control

Balancer’s native token BAL continues to trade under heavy pressure, now sitting near $0.97 and hovering close to multi-year lows. The weekly chart reflects persistent weakness, with price trending steadily downward since mid-2024 and repeatedly failing to reclaim key moving averages. The 50-week and 100-week moving averages remain firmly above price and slope downward, reinforcing a long-term bearish structure and signaling that momentum remains with sellers.

BAL price showing weakness | Source: BALUSDT chart on TradingView

Recent attempts to rebound have been shallow and short-lived. Indicating limited buying interest and a reluctance from market participants to position aggressively following the latest exploit news. This weakness predates the incident. However, BAL has been in a consistent downtrend for months, struggling to sustain demand even during broader market relief phases.

With the token sitting near its post-listing lows, the market is in a “show-me” phase. Bulls need to reclaim at least the $1.20–$1.40 area and break above the 50-week moving average to challenge the prevailing downtrend. Failure to do so risks deeper price compression and potential price discovery lower.

Featured image from ChatGPT, chart from TradingView.com

❌