OnePlus 15 and Realme 15 Pro belong to different leagues, one a flagship powerhouse, the other a premium midrange value phone. Yet, both come from the same tech family, showing how flagship innovation trickles down to affordable devices. This comparison isn’t about which is better overall, but about how close Realme’s midrange excellence comes to OnePlus’s top-tier experience.

Design and Display

Build and Feel:
OnePlus 15 offers a luxurious design with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 and an aluminum frame, built for strength and sophistication. The Realme 15 Pro focuses on comfort with fiberglass or eco-leather, keeping it lighter and stylish. Both have IP68 protection, but OnePlus goes further with IP69K resistance. Realme’s MIL-STD-810H rating adds durability, though it’s symbolic. Overall, OnePlus feels more premium, while Realme aims for comfort and practicality.

Display Quality:
OnePlus 15’s LTPO AMOLED screen (165Hz, Dolby Vision) offers ultra-smooth visuals and true-to-life contrast. Realme 15 Pro’s OLED panel (144Hz) impresses with stunning 6500-nit brightness, great for outdoor use. OnePlus delivers adaptive precision and motion fluidity, while Realme focuses on brightness and vibrancy. The difference reflects their goals, OnePlus for refinement, Realme for everyday brilliance.

Verdict:
OnePlus 15 sets the benchmark in build and display refinement. Realme 15 Pro proves that midrange devices can still look great and perform well visually for much less.

Specifications

Performance:
OnePlus 15’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and UFS 4.1 storage make it a performance beast. Realme 15 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and UFS 3.1 storage deliver balanced, smooth performance for daily use. OnePlus dominates in raw power and gaming, while Realme focuses on efficiency. Realme’s smooth performance shows how capable modern midrange chips have become.

Battery and Charging:
Both offer strong endurance, OnePlus 15 with 7300mAh and Realme 15 Pro with 7000mAh. OnePlus supports 120W wired, 50W wireless, and reverse charging, while Realme offers 80W wired only. OnePlus charges faster and supports more modes, but Realme’s simplicity works well for everyday needs.

Verdict:
OnePlus 15 leads in power and flexibility, while Realme 15 Pro balances performance and efficiency at a much lower cost.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses:
OnePlus 15’s triple 50MP setup (wide, periscope, ultrawide) is built for versatility and clarity. Realme 15 Pro’s dual 50MP cameras deliver sharp daylight photos but lack optical zoom and advanced depth. OnePlus handles color and stabilization better, while Realme remains impressive for casual use.

Selfie Camera:
Realme 15 Pro’s 50MP front lens offers crisp, bright selfies, while OnePlus 15’s 32MP camera captures more natural tones with autofocus and 4K recording. OnePlus favors balance and accuracy; Realme goes for sharp detail and vibrancy.

Verdict:
OnePlus 15 excels in flexibility and refinement. Realme 15 Pro delivers strong results for its class, ideal for social media and casual users.

Pricing

At about $900, the OnePlus 15 targets flagship seekers who want unmatched speed and premium design. The $500 Realme 15 Pro offers near-flagship performance for far less. They don’t compete directly; they serve different needs. OnePlus offers cutting-edge features, while Realme delivers flagship-like capability at an affordable price.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Verdict
Realme 15 Pro wins on value. OnePlus 15 justifies its price through superior build, performance, and charging versatility.

Conclusion

OnePlus 15 and Realme 15 Pro highlight how smartphones now bridge luxury and value. OnePlus remains the gold standard for flagship power, while Realme shows that midrange phones can feel premium too.

Verdict:
OnePlus 15 is for users wanting the absolute best Android experience. Realme 15 Pro is for smart buyers seeking 80% of that experience for half the cost. Different markets, but both are worth their price.

Read More:

• Vivo V60e vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro Full Comparison: Best Mid-Range Buy Under ₹35,000
• Oppo Find X9 vs OnePlus 13: Which Flagship Truly Deserves Your Money?
• OnePlus 15 vs iPhone 17: Design, Performance, Camera & Battery Compared

The post OnePlus 15 vs Realme 15 Pro: Detailed Comparison appeared first on Gizmochina.

With both the Vivo V60e and Motorola Edge 60 Pro emerging as top mid-range contenders, this comparison highlights how two brands approach value and performance differently. Vivo focuses on battery life, display brightness, and high-resolution cameras, while Motorola brings flagship-level power, design, and versatility at an accessible price. Here’s how they stack up across design, performance, camera, and overall value.

Design and Display

Build and Feel:

Both phones come with IP68/IP69 water and dust resistance, but their materials tell different stories. The Vivo V60e uses a glass front and plastic body, keeping it practical and lightweight. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro elevates the feel with Gorilla Glass 7i and an eco-leather back, adding a premium grip and more durability. With MIL-STD-810H compliance, Motorola feels sturdier and more high-end. 

Vivo’s design is simple and modern, while Motorola feels refined and rugged, ideal for users who value both elegance and endurance.

Display Quality:

Vivo’s 6.77-inch AMOLED display shines with HDR10+ and a blinding 5000 nits peak brightness, offering excellent outdoor visibility. Motorola’s 6.7-inch P-OLED screen, with higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and HDR10+, delivers sharper visuals and deeper contrast. It also includes 720Hz PWM dimming for smoother and eye-friendly viewing. 

While Vivo impresses with brightness, Motorola offers better clarity and precision, creating a more cinematic experience.

Verdict:

Vivo leads in brightness; Motorola wins in sharpness and display finesse. The Edge 60 Pro feels more premium in both design and viewing experience.

Specifications 

Performance:

Vivo V60e runs on the Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4nm) with a Mali-G615 MC2 GPU, ensuring smooth multitasking. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes a leap with the Dimensity 8350 Extreme (4nm) and Mali G615-MC6 GPU, offering much stronger processing and gaming performance. With UFS 4.0 storage (versus Vivo’s UFS 2.2), Motorola delivers faster app loading and responsiveness. 

Motorola feels more future-ready, while Vivo offers steady, efficient performance for regular use.

Battery and Charging:

Vivo packs a massive 6500mAh battery with 90W wired, reverse, and bypass charging, perfect for long days. Motorola’s 6000mAh battery supports 90W wired, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse charging, giving it more flexibility. 

Vivo lasts a bit longer, but Motorola adds convenience through wireless options.

Verdict:

Vivo wins on endurance, Motorola on power and versatility. The Edge 60 Pro feels more advanced overall.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses:

Vivo opts for a 200MP main camera and an 8MP ultrawide, focusing on detail-rich photos. Motorola’s triple setup,  50MP main, 10MP telephoto (3x optical zoom), and 50MP ultrawide,  provides far greater shooting flexibility. Motorola’s OIS and balanced color tones make it more consistent, especially for realistic photography, while Vivo’s high megapixels suit bright, social-media-style shots.

Selfie Camera:

Both feature 50MP front cameras with 4K recording, but Motorola’s HDR tuning and smoother exposure control deliver more natural tones. Vivo offers punchier selfies with slight beautification, ideal for social media, while Motorola is better for professional-looking captures.

Verdict:

Vivo delivers sheer resolution; Motorola offers balance, color accuracy, and versatility, a clear win for all-around photography.

Pricing

At ₹30,000 ($350), the Vivo V60e offers exceptional value with a massive battery, bright display, and sharp camera setup. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro, priced at ₹32,000 ($500), justifies the slight premium with superior performance, UFS 4.0 storage, wireless charging, and a more advanced camera system. Vivo is great for users seeking affordability and endurance, while Motorola suits those wanting flagship-like refinement without overspending.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Vivo V60e impresses with its 6500mAh battery, 5000-nit AMOLED screen, and 200MP camera, perfect for heavy users and photographers on a budget. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro, however, elevates the mid-range game with wireless charging, Pantone-validated display, UFS 4.0 storage, and Smart Connect support. Vivo focuses on stamina and brightness; Motorola delivers all-around excellence.

Final Verdict:
Motorola Edge 60 Pro emerges as the more complete and polished smartphone, while the Vivo V60e remains unbeatable for those who prioritize battery life and display brilliance.

Read More:

• Vivo V60e vs OnePlus Nord 5 Full Comparison – Display, Camera, Battery & Price
• OPPO Find X9 vs Reno 13 Pro: Huge Differences You Need to Know Before Buying
• OnePlus 15 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: Full Comparison – Specs, Camera, Performance & Verdict

The post Vivo V60e vs Motorola Edge 60 Pro Full Comparison: Best Mid-Range Buy Under ₹35,000 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Vivo V60e vs OnePlus Nord 5 comparison matters because both aim to redefine mid-range value. Vivo focuses on all-around performance, big battery, and superior camera tech, while OnePlus targets power users with raw speed and flagship-like responsiveness. Choosing between them comes down to what users value more: everyday versatility or performance dominance.

Design and Display

Build and Feel

The Vivo V60e combines a glass front with a plastic back and frame, offering IP68/IP69 protection against water and dust, a rare feature in this price range. It feels light and practical for everyday use. The Nord 5 feels sturdier with its solid frame, but lacks similar water resistance. Vivo’s design favors reliability over flash, which gives it an edge for durability.
Vivo’s rugged protection makes it better suited for long-term use and outdoor reliability.

Display Quality

Vivo’s 6.77-inch AMOLED panel supports HDR10+, 120 Hz refresh rate, and up to 5,000 nits peak brightness. Colors are vivid and visibility is excellent, even under sunlight. The Nord 5’s AMOLED display matches the refresh rate but typically offers lower brightness. Both deliver smooth visuals, but Vivo’s HDR and higher brightness give it the upper hand for viewing and streaming. Vivo’s display feels more balanced for all conditions, bright, smooth, and immersive.

Verdict

Both look premium, but Vivo V60e wins this round for better durability, brightness, and usability.

Specifications

Performance

Vivo V60e uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo chip paired with up to 12 GB RAM. It’s efficient and stable, ideal for multitasking and daily use. The Nord 5, with its more powerful chipset, handles gaming and heavy workloads better. Still, Vivo’s balanced thermal control makes it smoother for long sessions. Vivo is tuned for consistency, while Nord 5 favors raw speed.

Battery and Charging

Vivo packs a 6,500 mAh battery with 90 W charging, plus reverse and bypass modes. It easily lasts over a day, charging quickly without overheating. The Nord 5’s smaller cell and similar charging speed keep it close but not equal. Vivo offers more freedom and endurance for travel or long days.

Verdict

Vivo V60e leads in battery life and practicality; Nord 5 in pure processing.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses

The 200 MP main sensor with OIS gives the Vivo V60e incredible detail and stability, paired with an 8 MP ultra-wide lens. The Nord 5 can’t match that megapixel count, making Vivo’s setup superior for photography. Vivo’s camera is built for creators who want clarity and control.

Selfie Camera

A 50 MP front camera with autofocus and 4K video support makes Vivo ideal for selfies and vlogs. Nord 5’s selfie setup is solid but not as feature-rich. Vivo offers sharper, more dynamic selfies.

Verdict

Vivo dominates the camera category for both rear and front performance.

Pricing

At around ₹30,000, the Vivo V60e delivers strong value with a better camera, bigger battery, and rugged design. The Nord 5, though slightly pricier, targets performance-first users. Vivo provides more complete value for everyday users, while Nord 5 suits speed seekers.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Vivo stands out with IP68/IP69 resistance, a 200 MP camera, a 6,500 mAh battery, and 90 W charging. Nord 5 focuses on performance and gaming polish.

Verdict

For users wanting balance, endurance, and great photography, the Vivo V60e is the smarter choice. The Nord 5 is better for those chasing peak performance. Vivo feels like the more thoughtful, complete smartphone.

Read More:

• Vivo X300 vs Xiaomi 17: Can Dimensity Beat Snapdragon’s Best?
• Oppo Find X9 vs OnePlus 13: Which Flagship Truly Deserves Your Money?
• OnePlus 15 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: Full Comparison – Specs, Camera, Performance & Verdict

The post Vivo V60e vs OnePlus Nord 5 Full Comparison – Display, Camera, Battery & Price appeared first on Gizmochina.

OnePlus 15 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XL comparison highlights two very different visions of premium Android. OnePlus focuses on sheer performance, speed, and futuristic design, while Google emphasizes intelligent software, camera innovation, and long-term reliability. This comparison isn’t just about hardware, but it’s about what modern users value most: raw power or refined intelligence.

Key Features:

Feature	OnePlus 15	Google Pixel 9 Pro XL	Winner
Performance & Processor	Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm), Adreno 840 GPU	Tensor G4 (4nm), Mali-G715 GPU	OnePlus 15 – Faster and more powerful
Camera System	Triple 50MP lenses, hardware-driven imaging	50MP + 48MP + 48MP, AI-enhanced photography	Pixel 9 Pro XL – Smarter and more consistent photos
Battery & Charging	7300mAh, 120W wired, 50W wireless	5060mAh, 37W wired, 23W wireless	OnePlus 15 – Bigger battery, much faster charging
Display Quality	6.78″ LTPO AMOLED, 165Hz, Dolby Vision	6.8″ LTPO OLED, 120Hz, 3000 nits peak brightness	Tie – OnePlus smoother, Pixel brighter
Software & Updates	Android 16 (ColorOS 16), 3–4 years updates	Android 14 → 16, 7 years of updates, AI features	Pixel 9 Pro XL – Longer support, smarter software

Design and Display

Build and Feel:

Both phones are premium but take different design paths. The OnePlus 15’s aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 give it a sleek, durable look, while IP69K protection adds rare ruggedness. The Pixel 9 Pro XL’s signature visor design and Victus 2 glass on both sides feel refined but heavier. The OnePlus feels more futuristic and ergonomic, while the Pixel leans on Google’s familiar, sturdy aesthetic. For comfort and toughness, the OnePlus feels more advanced; for minimalism and brand identity, the Pixel stands tall.

Display Quality:

The OnePlus 15’s 165Hz LTPO AMOLED delivers incredible smoothness with Dolby Vision and Ultra HDR. The Pixel 9 Pro XL’s 120Hz LTPO OLED offers sharper resolution and up to 3000 nits brightness, ideal for outdoor use. OnePlus excels in motion and contrast; Pixel shines in clarity and color accuracy. The Pixel’s screen feels more professional; the OnePlus feels more dynamic and immersive.

Verdict:

The OnePlus 15 is better for gamers and visual enthusiasts. The Pixel 9 Pro XL suits users who value balanced color science and real-world brightness over speed.

Specifications 

Performance:

Powered by Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, the OnePlus 15 delivers top-tier power and efficiency. Its Adreno 840 GPU easily outpaces the Pixel’s Mali-G715, especially in gaming and heavy multitasking. The Pixel’s Tensor G4 focuses more on AI processing, optimizing smart features rather than raw power. The OnePlus feels faster under load; the Pixel feels smarter in daily use. It’s a choice between brute force and AI intelligence.

Battery and Charging:

The OnePlus 15’s 7300 mAh battery with 120W wired and 50W wireless charging is unmatched. It refuels fully in about 40 minutes, while the Pixel’s 5060 mAh battery and 37W charging are slower but efficient. The Pixel optimizes better for steady use; the OnePlus wins on charging speed and flexibility. Frequent travelers or gamers will value the OnePlus’s endurance advantage.

Verdict:

The OnePlus 15 dominates in power and longevity. The Pixel 9 Pro XL prioritizes stable, optimized use but can’t match OnePlus’s speed and versatility.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses:

The Pixel 9 Pro XL continues Google’s camera mastery, using AI to deliver stunning clarity and HDR balance. Its 5x zoom and advanced processing make photos consistently vibrant. The OnePlus 15’s triple 50MP setup leans on hardware strength and manual control, producing natural tones and rich details. Pixel images are more refined automatically, while OnePlus offers creative flexibility for advanced users.

Selfie Camera:

Pixel’s 42MP front camera captures incredible detail and wide angles, perfect for vlogs or group shots. OnePlus 32MP selfie cam focuses faster and delivers sharp, well-balanced portraits. Pixel leads in dynamic range and realism; OnePlus feels smoother in performance and video output.

Verdict:

For effortless, AI-driven photography, Pixel 9 Pro XL wins. For manual creativity and balanced results, the OnePlus 15 offers more control and versatility.

Pricing

At around $900, the OnePlus 15 offers premium specs that rival or exceed the Pixel 9 Pro XL’s $1100 package. The Pixel justifies its higher price through longer software support and superior computational imaging. Still, the OnePlus gives more tangible power and faster charging for less money.

Pixel appeals to ecosystem users; OnePlus appeals to performance seekers.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

The OnePlus 15 brings standout features, 165Hz Ultra HDR AMOLED, 120W charging, and IP69K protection, rare even in ultra-premium phones. The Pixel 9 Pro XL offers UWB, Satellite SOS, and smarter AI integration. Each reflects its brand DNA: OnePlus for speed and flexibility, Pixel for intelligence and camera finesse.

Verdict:

For users chasing raw power, futuristic design, and unmatched charging tech, the OnePlus 15 is the clear winner. For those prioritizing long-term updates, AI prowess, and superior photography, the Pixel 9 Pro XL delivers the smarter experience. Overall, OnePlus wins as the best value for money. 

Read More:

• OnePlus 15 vs iPhone 17: Design, Performance, Camera & Battery Compared
• Oppo Find X9 vs OnePlus 13: Which Flagship Truly Deserves Your Money?
• Vivo X300 Pro vs iPhone 17 Pro Max: $800 Phone Takes on Apple’s Flagship

The post OnePlus 15 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: Full Comparison – Specs, Camera, Performance & Verdict appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• China unveils its vision for low-altitude urban and regional air travel at the 2025 China International Import Expo.
  
• Simulated “flying fares” show 10–15 minute flights between Shanghai and nearby cities for under CNY120 / $17
  
• Electric aircraft with five-passenger capacity and 250 km range highlight sustainable mobility innovation.

A Glimpse into the Future of Urban Air Travel

The 8th China International Import Expo (CIIE) in Shanghai is not just a showcase of global trade; it’s a window into the future of transportation. On the third day of the event, the spotlight fell on the “Future Low-Altitude Travel” zone within the Automotive and Smart Mobility exhibition area. This unique section introduced visitors to the possibilities of everyday air commuting through low-altitude mobility systems.

The “Future Terminal” Experience

The exhibit was designed like a futuristic low-altitude travel terminal, complete with zones for security checks, digital flight information boards, and even a cozy waiting lounge. A key attraction was a simulated ticket vending machine, which allowed visitors to explore potential routes and fares of short-distance air travel.

According to the simulation, a 10-minute intra-city flight from the National Exhibition Center to The Bund in Shanghai could cost around ¥49 / $7, while a 15-minute cross-city flight from Shanghai to Suzhou would be priced at about ¥119 / $17. These figures are based on realistic projections of future operating costs, making the idea of “flying to work” seem surprisingly affordable.

Electric Aircraft Lead the Way

A prototype electric aircraft on display captured significant attention. The model featured a 15-meter wingspan, a 10-meter fuselage, and room for five passengers. It can reach speeds of up to 200 km/h and cover distances of up to 250 km on a single charge, perfect for regional commutes. The design emphasizes zero-emission, sustainable travel powered by advanced battery technology.

Strategic Significance for China

Low-altitude travel has been identified as a key component of China’s next-generation transportation network. It forms a crucial part of the country’s “low-altitude economy,” which has been prioritized under China’s 15th Five-Year Plan. The focus reflects China’s ambition to integrate electric air mobility into daily life, connecting urban and suburban regions faster, cleaner, and more efficiently.

At CIIE 2025, this showcase wasn’t just an exhibit; it was a bold statement of how China envisions the skies becoming part of everyday travel in the years ahead.

Read More:

• China Will Win the AI Race: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s Warning to the West
• AI Chip War Heats Up: U.S. Blocks Nvidia, China Responds with Total Ban
• NVIDIA’s Market Share in China Drops from 95% to Zero Amid US Export Restrictions

(via)

The post In China, Sky Is the New Highway: Future Flying Taxi Fares Revealed at CIIE 2025 appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• Jensen Huang warns that China is catching up fast in AI and could “win the race.”
  
• He criticizes U.S. restrictions and overregulation for slowing innovation.
  
• Huang clarifies he wants America to lead by accelerating, not isolating.

Huang’s Warning at the London AI Summit

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has warned that China is moving rapidly toward AI dominance and could “win the AI race” if the U.S. continues to slow its innovation through overregulation and export restrictions. Speaking at the Financial Times Future of AI Summit in London, Huang said China is “nanoseconds behind America” in AI progress, highlighting how quickly the global gap is closing.

Huang urged Western countries to speed up AI development rather than hold it back. “It’s vital that America wins by racing ahead and winning developers worldwide,” he later wrote on X (formerly Twitter).

China’s Rapid AI Growth

According to Huang, China’s government-backed energy subsidies and strong state support are helping local companies advance faster. Beijing’s investments in semiconductor manufacturing and AI research are creating an ecosystem that rivals the U.S. in both scale and ambition.

He noted that while China faces technological hurdles, its developer community and policy environment are highly motivated and unified under national goals for AI self-reliance.

U.S. Restrictions and Policy Concerns

The U.S. government recently reaffirmed its ban on Nvidia’s advanced Blackwell AI chips being sold to China, citing national security reasons. Huang criticized these restrictions, arguing they hurt U.S. competitiveness and inadvertently push China to accelerate its own chip development.

He also pointed to state-level AI regulations and high energy costs as factors slowing innovation in the U.S. “Cynicism and overregulation are making it harder for American companies to move fast,” he said.

Market Reaction and Clarification

After his remarks were reported, Nvidia’s stock briefly dipped, prompting Huang to clarify that he wasn’t predicting U.S. defeat. Instead, he emphasized that the U.S. must act faster to maintain its lead. Nvidia remains the world’s most valuable company, valued at around US$4.7 trillion, even after a recent dip from its US$5 trillion milestone.

Balancing Global AI Competition

Huang’s comments come amid rising U.S.–China tensions over technology and trade. While Washington focuses on limiting China’s access to cutting-edge AI hardware, Beijing is boosting domestic innovation.

Huang’s message was clear: the U.S. should lead through innovation and collaboration, not isolation. “We want America to win,” he said, “but winning means building faster, not building walls.”

Read More:

• US AI Tools Under Fire: Are America’s Top Coders Using Chinese Models?
• AI Chip War Heats Up: U.S. Blocks Nvidia, China Responds with Total Ban
• China’s XPENG Shocks the World with Full-Stack Physical AI: Meet the IRON Robot and Flying Car

(via)

The post China Will Win the AI Race: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s Warning to the West appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• Apple is close to signing a US$1 billion per year deal with Google to use its Gemini AI model for Siri.
  
• The upgraded Siri is expected to launch in spring 2026 as part of iOS 26.4.
  
• Apple plans to use Gemini temporarily while developing its own large-scale AI model.

Apple Turns to Google for AI Upgrade

Apple is in final talks with Google to integrate its powerful Gemini AI model into Siri, marking one of the biggest artificial intelligence partnerships in the tech industry. The deal, worth around US$1 billion per year, aims to overhaul Siri’s capabilities and bring Apple up to speed in the fast-moving AI race. According to Bloomberg, the Gemini-powered Siri could launch by spring 2026 with iOS 26.4.

A Smarter, More Capable Siri

Currently, Siri runs on Apple’s in-house cloud AI with around 150 billion parameters. Under the new agreement, it will tap into Google’s Gemini model, which boasts 1.2 trillion parameters, nearly eight times more powerful. The upgrade will allow Siri to better understand complex commands, summarise information, and plan multi-step tasks.

Internally, the Siri revamp is known as “Linwood”, while the larger AI project is called “Glenwood.” The effort is being led by Apple executives Craig Federighi and Mike Rockwell, the creator of the Vision Pro headset.

Privacy and Performance

Despite using Google’s AI, Apple will maintain strict privacy controls. Gemini will operate on Apple’s Private Cloud Compute (PCC) servers, ensuring user data remains isolated from Google’s infrastructure. All processing will be temporary, with no data stored between sessions, reinforcing Apple’s privacy-first image.

However, this setup means Apple must expand its cloud hardware to handle Gemini’s massive size, potentially increasing costs and system load.

Why Apple Chose Google

Apple reportedly tested multiple AI models, including OpenAI’s GPT and Anthropic’s Claude, before selecting Gemini for its contextual understanding, scalability, and integration flexibility. While the deal gives Apple a major AI boost, it’s seen as a temporary arrangement until Apple completes its own 1-trillion-parameter AI model.

In markets like China, where Google services are banned, Apple plans to rely on its in-house models and local partners like Alibaba for regulatory compliance.

Strategic Implications

The collaboration marks a shift in Apple’s strategy, from building everything internally to selectively partnering with industry leaders. While the partnership won’t be publicly branded like the Safari-Google Search deal, it highlights how Apple is adapting to remain competitive in generative AI.

Both Apple and Google stocks rose after reports of the deal, signaling investor optimism. Once launched, the Gemini-powered Siri could redefine what voice assistants are capable of, blending power, privacy, and intelligence in a way that reshapes the AI landscape.

Read More:

• AI Chip War Heats Up: U.S. Blocks Nvidia, China Responds with Total Ban
• NVIDIA’s Market Share in China Drops from 95% to Zero Amid US Export Restrictions
• US AI Tools Under Fire: Are America’s Top Coders Using Chinese Models?

(via)

The post Apple Turns to Google for AI Help: $1 Billion Deal to Power Siri With Gemini appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• Two US-based AI coding tools are suspected of using Chinese open-source models.
  
• The issue has sparked debates on ethics, transparency, and attribution in AI development.
  
• Chinese foundational models like GLM-4.6 are shaping global AI products, even in the US market.

Rising Concerns Over Model Origins

Two newly launched AI coding tools from US-based companies, Cognition AI and Cursor, are under scrutiny for possibly being built on Chinese foundational AI models. The controversy has reignited discussions around transparency and credit in the commercialization of open-source artificial intelligence systems.

Cognition AI’s SWE-1.5 Under the Spotlight

San Francisco–based Cognition AI, valued at about $10.2 billion, recently introduced its SWE-1.5 model, which boasts near state-of-the-art coding performance and record generation speed. While the company confirmed that SWE-1.5 was built “on top of a leading open-source base model,” it did not specify which one.

However, speculation quickly arose that SWE-1.5 may be based on Zhipu AI’s GLM-4.6, a flagship Chinese model released under an MIT open-source license. Zhipu AI itself hinted that Cognition’s model might have used GLM-4.6 as its foundation, though Cognition AI has not commented publicly on the matter.

Cursor’s Composer Faces Similar Questions

Another San Francisco startup, Cursor, valued at $9.9 billion, launched a coding assistant called Composer, which delivers performance similar to SWE-1.5. Users reported discovering traces of Chinese-language reasoning in the tool’s output, leading to speculation that Composer also relies on a Chinese base model. Cursor has so far declined to address these claims.

Ethical and Licensing Debate

At the center of the issue lies the question of ethical use and attribution in AI. Many Chinese models, including GLM-4.6, are released under permissive licenses like MIT, which allow companies to use and modify them commercially without mandatory credit. While legal, this practice has raised concerns about fairness and transparency in AI development.

According to AI researcher Florian Brand from Trier University, “the fine-tuning is the ‘sauce’”, meaning the true value often comes from customization and reinforcement learning, not just the base model itself.

Zhipu AI’s Perspective

Rather than seeing the situation as negative, Zhipu AI has emphasized the positive impact of open-source collaboration, saying it strengthens the global AI ecosystem. The company has seen a tenfold rise in overseas paid users in recent months and has launched a coding subscription plan to expand internationally.

Why This Matters to Everyday Users

For ordinary users, this controversy highlights growing concerns around trust, transparency, and data security in AI tools. When companies don’t disclose where their models come from, users can’t be sure how their data is handled or whether the technology follows proper privacy standards. It also raises ethical questions about fair use and credit in open-source AI, meaning the tools people rely on might be built on others’ work without acknowledgment. 

Ultimately, this shows how AI has become deeply global and interconnected, blurring national boundaries and making transparency more important than ever for user trust.

Read More:

• AI Chip War Heats Up: U.S. Blocks Nvidia, China Responds with Total Ban
• NVIDIA’s Market Share in China Drops from 95% to Zero Amid US Export Restrictions
• Tech War Intensifies: China’s Lithography Breakthrough Challenges U.S. Semiconductor Edge

(via)

The post US AI Tools Under Fire: Are America’s Top Coders Using Chinese Models? appeared first on Gizmochina.

Key Highlights:

• U.S. government has officially blocked Nvidia from selling its advanced Blackwell and B30A AI chips to China.
• China has responded with a new rule banning foreign AI chips from all state-funded data centers.
• Global AI chip war deepens as both nations tighten technology controls

White House Blocks Nvidia’s Advanced Blackwell Chip Sales to China

The Trump administration has decided not to allow Nvidia to sell its latest Blackwell AI chip to China. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed the decision, stating, “The Blackwell chip is not something we’re interested in selling to China right now.”

This decision follows months of speculation about whether a scaled-down version of the chip might be cleared for sale. The move aligns with President Trump’s strategy to maintain America’s technological edge in artificial intelligence and prevent China from acquiring high-end U.S. hardware.

US Treasury Secretary Calls Blackwell the “Crown Jewel”

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described Nvidia’s Blackwell chip as the “crown jewel” of American AI innovation. He indicated that sales to China might be reconsidered only after the chip becomes outdated in 12 to 24 months. According to Bessent, Nvidia’s rapid pace of innovation means that the Blackwell could soon be several generations behind the company’s latest models.

Nvidia’s Market Collapse in China

Nvidia’s position in China has deteriorated sharply. Once controlling 95% of the Chinese AI data center market in 2022, the company now holds no market share. CEO Jensen Huang has expressed hope that Nvidia will eventually return to the Chinese market, but admitted there are no current plans to do so. Nvidia is reportedly redesigning its B30A chip in hopes of meeting future U.S. export conditions.

China Retaliates with Ban on Foreign AI Chips

In a direct response, Beijing has ordered that all new data centre projects receiving state funding must use only domestically produced AI chips. Projects that are less than 30% complete are required to remove or cancel any foreign chip orders, while those further along will be reviewed individually.

This directive represents one of China’s most aggressive steps toward achieving AI chip self-sufficiency. It is expected to benefit domestic manufacturers such as Huawei, Cambricon, and MetaX. However, industry analysts warn that Chinese AI chips still lag behind Nvidia’s products in performance and software ecosystem support, potentially slowing China’s AI development.

The Global AI Divide Widens

The escalating U.S.–China chip restrictions are reshaping the global AI landscape. The United States aims to secure national security and preserve its technological dominance, while China seeks independence from U.S. technology and to strengthen its domestic semiconductor ecosystem.

While American tech giants like Microsoft, Meta, and OpenAI continue to build massive AI data centres using Nvidia’s most advanced chips, China risks falling behind in computing capacity despite gains in local chip production.

Both the U.S. and China are pursuing self-reliance in AI technology, setting the stage for a deeper divide in global innovation. The U.S. is safeguarding its AI lead, while China is accelerating its domestic semiconductor push. 

Nvidia and other American chipmakers are losing access to one of the world’s largest markets, while Chinese chip firms stand to benefit, though at the cost of slower advancement in high-end AI capabilities.

Read More:

• NVIDIA’s Market Share in China Drops from 95% to Zero Amid US Export Restrictions
• China’s XPENG Shocks the World with Full-Stack Physical AI: Meet the IRON Robot and Flying Car
• Tech War Intensifies: China’s Lithography Breakthrough Challenges U.S. Semiconductor Edge

(via)

The post AI Chip War Heats Up: U.S. Blocks Nvidia, China Responds with Total Ban appeared first on Gizmochina.

OPPO Find X9 vs OPPO Reno 13 Pro comparison is an exciting one because it pits a true flagship against a near-flagship contender from the same brand. Both phones showcase OPPO’s design excellence and cutting-edge tech, but they cater to slightly different users; one prioritizes power and innovation, while the other focuses on balanced performance and value. This comparison highlights how much of the flagship experience you actually get when spending less.

Key Features:

Category	OPPO Find X9	OPPO Reno 13 Pro	Winner
Processor & Performance	MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm), UFS 4.1	MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (4nm), UFS 3.1	Find X9
Display Quality	6.59″ AMOLED, 3600 nits peak, Dolby Vision, HDR10+	6.83″ AMOLED, 1200 nits peak, HDR10+	Find X9
Camera Setup	Triple 50MP (Hasselblad tuned, Dolby Vision video)	50MP + 50MP + 8MP, good but smaller sensors	Find X9
Selfie Camera	32MP, 4K video, stable EIS	50MP with AF, sharper stills	Reno 13 Pro
Battery & Charging	7025mAh, 80W wired, 50W wireless, reverse charge	5800mAh, 80W wired, 50W wireless (China only)	Find X9

Design and Display

Build and Feel:

Both the OPPO Find X9 and Reno 13 Pro flaunt premium glass-and-metal designs, complete with IP68/IP69 water and dust resistance. The Find X9 edges ahead with a sturdier aluminum frame and slightly more refined build, offering a higher-end flagship finish. The Reno 13 Pro, while slim and elegant, leans toward a lighter, sleeker aesthetic that prioritizes comfort and portability. The Find X9’s design feels more luxurious and robust, targeting users who prefer a solid hand feel, while the Reno 13 Pro appeals to those who value modern minimalism. In essence, the Find X9 looks and feels more “flagship,” whereas the Reno 13 Pro delivers a balance between style and practicality.

Display Quality:

The Find X9 offers a 6.59-inch AMOLED display with HDR10+, Dolby Vision, and a staggering 3600 nits peak brightness, making it a treat for content lovers. Its color vibrancy and HDR calibration are flagship-grade, enhanced further by Dolby Vision and Ultra HDR support. The Reno 13 Pro, with its larger 6.83-inch AMOLED, also impresses but caps at 1200 nits peak brightness. While it provides fluid visuals with 120Hz and HDR10+, it lacks the ultra-high brightness and HDR depth of the Find X9. The Find X9 delivers superior clarity and dynamic contrast, ideal for outdoor use and multimedia enthusiasts.

Verdict:

The Find X9 dominates in both build quality and display richness, setting a higher bar for brightness, HDR performance, and luxury feel. The Reno 13 Pro remains an excellent choice for users who want a bigger screen at a slightly lower cost, but doesn’t quite reach the flagship finesse of the Find X9.

Specifications 

Performance:

The Find X9 houses the powerful Dimensity 9500 chipset built on a 3nm process, easily outclassing the Reno 13 Pro’s Dimensity 8350 (4nm). This translates to faster processing, smoother multitasking, and superior AI and gaming capabilities. The G1-Ultra GPU enhances graphical performance, while UFS 4.1 storage ensures blazing-fast app loading and data access. The Reno 13 Pro’s hardware still performs impressively for everyday users, but it is a step behind in raw computational and graphical muscle. The Find X9’s advanced chipset makes it more future-proof and ideal for demanding users or gamers who want sustained top-tier performance without throttling.

Battery and Charging:

The Find X9 offers a massive 7025mAh battery, one of the largest in its class, paired with 80W wired and 50W wireless charging. It also supports reverse wireless charging, a rare flagship-grade addition. The Reno 13 Pro, with a 5800mAh battery, still provides excellent endurance but uses slower UFCS and PPS charging protocols (33W). Its 50W wireless charging is region-limited, adding minor inconsistency. In day-to-day performance, the Find X9 lasts longer and charges faster, making it the superior choice for heavy users who prioritize reliability and convenience.

Verdict:

When it comes to performance and endurance, the Find X9 clearly leads with stronger silicon, better energy management, and more versatile charging options. The Reno 13 Pro still holds its ground for moderate users, but falls short of the Find X9’s flagship-grade efficiency and power delivery.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses:

The Find X9’s triple 50MP system, fine-tuned by Hasselblad, delivers professional-grade results. Its larger sensor, periscope telephoto with OIS, and advanced color calibration produce sharper detail and truer tones across all lighting conditions. The Reno 13 Pro’s 50MP setup, while solid, uses a smaller sensor and lacks the same level of post-processing finesse. Its 8MP ultrawide feels limited compared to the Find X9’s 50MP ultrawide lens. The Find X9’s imaging pipeline also benefits from enhanced HDR video recording and Dolby Vision support, offering a cinematic edge that content creators will appreciate.

Selfie Camera:

The Reno 13 Pro packs a standout 50MP selfie camera with autofocus, one of the best in its segment. It captures excellent skin tones and dynamic range, even outperforming the Find X9’s 32MP shooter in certain lighting. However, the Find X9 compensates with 4K selfie video and consistent stabilization, making it more balanced for vlogging and professional content. Both phones handle selfies well, but the Reno 13 Pro has a slight advantage for high-detail stills.

Verdict:

For overall imaging performance, the Find X9 remains the more capable camera phone with superior optics, processing, and versatility. The Reno 13 Pro shines with its front camera but doesn’t match the flagship’s depth and color accuracy on the rear.

Pricing

At approximately $650, the OPPO Find X9 sits slightly above the $600 Reno 13 Pro, positioning itself firmly in flagship territory. The $50 difference is modest considering the Find X9’s superior chipset, camera, and charging features. The Reno 13 Pro’s pricing makes it an excellent value pick for those who want near-flagship specs without paying the full premium.

Verdict 

While the Reno 13 Pro offers great value, the Find X9 justifies its slightly higher cost with significant improvements in performance, camera, and battery. For users seeking a well-rounded premium experience, the Find X9 delivers more long-term value per dollar.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

Both smartphones reflect OPPO’s excellence in design and innovation, but they cater to slightly different audiences. For just $50 more, the Find X9 offers a superior processor (Dimensity 9500), better HDR display with Dolby Vision, a larger 7025mAh battery, and a Hasselblad-tuned triple camera system that outperforms the Reno 13 Pro in detail, low-light, and video quality. While the Reno 13 Pro impresses with its 50MP selfie camera and sleek design, the Find X9 delivers a more complete flagship experience, faster, brighter, longer-lasting, and more future-proof.

Verdict:

OPPO Find X9 is the smarter buy, a true flagship upgrade that offers significantly better value for only a small price difference.

Read More:

• OnePlus 15 vs iPhone 17: Design, Performance, Camera & Battery Compared
• Oppo Find X9 vs OnePlus 13: Which Flagship Truly Deserves Your Money?
• iPhone 17 Pro vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra Full Comparison and Verdict

The post OPPO Find X9 vs Reno 13 Pro: Huge Differences You Need to Know Before Buying appeared first on Gizmochina.

OnePlus 15 vs iPhone 17 showdown highlights two flagship giants with distinct philosophies, Android innovation versus Apple refinement. This comparison matters because it reveals how OnePlus challenges Apple’s dominance with cutting-edge hardware, while the iPhone focuses on seamless performance and ecosystem strength. It’s a clash between raw power and polished experience.

Design and Display

Build and Feel: The OnePlus 15 feels solid and durable with its aluminum frame, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, and IP69K rating, built for rugged use. The iPhone 17, though lighter, leans toward elegance with its Ceramic Shield 2 and refined aluminum finish. The OnePlus offers better practicality and toughness, while the iPhone focuses on premium minimalist features.

Display Quality:
OnePlus 15’s 6.78-inch AMOLED 165Hz display is made for speed and immersion, perfect for gamers and heavy media users. The iPhone 17’s smaller 6.3-inch OLED shines in brightness and color accuracy, delivering natural tones and higher peak brightness. The OnePlus is about punch and motion, the iPhone about realism and polish.

Verdict:
Both are premium, but the OnePlus 15 wins for versatility and smoother visuals. The iPhone 17 remains ideal for users who value visual balance and sleek design.

Please Note: When you buy something using the links in our articles, we may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Specifications 

Performance:
With Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and up to 16GB RAM, the OnePlus 15 offers raw power and smoother multitasking. The iPhone 17’s A19 chip is efficient and stable, but slightly limited by 8GB RAM. The OnePlus feels faster in high-load use, while the iPhone excels in thermal management and stability.

Battery and Charging:
OnePlus 15’s 7300mAh battery and 120W charging easily outperform the iPhone 17’s smaller 3692mAh cell and slower speeds. Its 50W wireless and reverse charging options make it far more flexible for daily use. iPhone remains efficient but can’t match OnePlus’ endurance.

Verdict:
Both are powerful, but the OnePlus 15 dominates in charging speed and stamina. iPhone 17 wins only in long-term efficiency.

Camera

Main and Secondary Lenses:
OnePlus 15 packs triple 50MP sensors, including a periscope lens with 3.5x zoom, versatile and pro-friendly. iPhone 17’s dual 48MP setup is simpler but delivers more natural and balanced results. OnePlus suits creators seeking flexibility, while the iPhone prioritizes clean, consistent shots.

Selfie Camera:
OnePlus offers a sharp 32MP camera with 4K recording and EIS, great for vlogs. The iPhone’s 18MP lens, though smaller, shines in color realism and depth sensing with spatial audio.

Verdict:
OnePlus 15 provides a better creative range, while iPhone 17 ensures polished, life-like captures. 

Pricing

At around $900, the OnePlus 15 delivers superior specs, display, and battery tech. The iPhone 17, priced at $800, banks on brand appeal, ecosystem, and long-term updates. For those valuing performance and flexibility, the OnePlus is worth the extra cost; for simplicity and reliability, the iPhone remains a safer pick.

Disclaimer:
Prices are approximate and may vary based on country, region, and applicable taxes.

Conclusion

The OnePlus 15 stands out with blazing-fast charging, a bigger battery, an infrared port, and IP69K protection, a true powerhouse for enthusiasts. The iPhone 17’s strengths lie in its software ecosystem, satellite SOS, and Face ID security. The OnePlus feels more feature-rich and performance-driven, while the iPhone excels in refinement and user trust.

Final Verdict: OnePlus 15 takes the crown for innovation and hardware value, whereas iPhone 17 wins for simplicity and ecosystem integration.

Read More:

• OnePlus 15 vs OnePlus 13: Is the OnePlus 15 Worth the Hype?
• OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The $800 Phone That Beats a $1300 Flagship
• iPhone 17 Pro vs iPhone 17 Air: Ultra-slim design highlighted in new comparison image

The post OnePlus 15 vs iPhone 17: Design, Performance, Camera & Battery Compared appeared first on Gizmochina.