Reading view

What Are Some of the Most Likely Stanley Cup Finals Matchups?

Dec 5, 2024; Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; Colorado Avalanche right wing Nikolai Kovalenko (51) checks Carolina Hurricanes right wing Jackson Blake (53) during the third period at Lenovo Center. Mandatory Credit: James Guillory-Imagn Images

The 2025-26 NHL season has reached the point where narratives give way to numbers— and the numbers tell a story of parity.

With fewer than a dozen games remaining for most teams, the race for the Stanley Cup is tightening into a data-driven sprint. Goal differentials, special teams, and situational execution are no longer supporting details— they are defining indicators.

No team has separated. Several have built cases.

At the top, the Colorado Avalanche (48–14–10, 106 points) and Carolina Hurricanes (46–21–6, 98 points), each with a goal historically a strong predictor of postseason success. Close behind, the Tampa Bay Lightning and Edmonton Oilers rank among the league leaders in goals. 

Further down the bracket, momentum belongs to teams like the Pittsburgh Penguins and Vegas Golden Knights, while younger rosters in the Buffalo Sabres and Anaheim Ducks are beginning to translate development into results.

All these teams have a real shot at making it to the Stanley Cup Final, which begs the question: What would some of the most likely Finals matchups look like?

Hurricanes vs. Avalanche: Elite by Every Measure

A Carolina–Colorado series wouldn’t just feature two contenders—it would feature two of the league’s most complete statistical profiles.

Colorado’s 48 wins are backed by top-tier puck possession metrics and a goals-against average hovering near 2.5 due to the amazing performance of Scott Wedgwood.

The Aves power play operates at 17.2%, which is not the percentage the Aves want. The offense of the Aves speaks volumes. A +85 goal differential has driven the Aves’ ability to outshoot opponents. This means the Aves are near perfect at outscoring their opponents.

Carolina matches that efficiency differently. Their penalty kill ranks at the top of the NHL at 166 penalties, and they allow 10.6 shots per game—one of the lowest marks in the league. The Canes have 46 wins and aren’t built on explosive scoring, but on control: structure, forechecking pressure, and depth scoring across all four lines.

Head-to-head, Colorado’s 5–3 win in January reflected the contrast—high-end scoring versus layered defense.

In a seven-game series, the edge may come down to special teams. Both teams are top-tier at even strength. The difference will be who capitalizes when the game tilts.

An Avalanche of goals narrated by @ConorMcGaheypic.twitter.com/4a7fCJ9cbt

— x – Colorado Avalanche (@Avalanche) March 25, 2026

Penguins vs. Golden Knights: The Analytics of a Turnaround

Pittsburgh’s resurgence is backed by underlying improvement, not luck.

Since the Olympic break, the Penguins have posted a points percentage above .600 while reducing goals against to about 3.0 per game. That, in part, is because of Arturs Silovs’ stellar save percentage at .891

Captain Sidney Crosby has fueled mainly the puck control in key moments at 709 face off wins.

Vegas, by contrast, has remained steady rather than surging. Their 32–26–16 record reflects inconsistency, but their advanced metrics suggest a team more dangerous than its record indicates. The franchise must think there’s more untapped potential on the roster, as they just fired Head Coach Bruce Cassidy with eight games left in the season.

Both the Golden Knights and Penguins win in similar ways: structured breakouts, disciplined neutral-zone play, and limiting high-danger chances.

This would not be a high-scoring series. It would be a territorial one—decided by inches, not chances.

Hear from Head Coach Bruce Cassidy, Brayden McNabb, and Ivan Barbashev following Sunday’s win against the Stars.

Full video on our YouTube Channel: https://t.co/JlBNkHd4jwpic.twitter.com/a52Akk9e1B

— Vegas Golden Knights (@GoldenKnights) March 23, 2026

Lightning vs. Oilers: Numbers vs. Identity

Few matchups present a clearer stylistic—and statistical—contrast.

Tampa Bay ranks among the league’s best in goals allowed per game at 2.75 while maintaining a power play efficiency near 22%. Their experience shows in situational metrics: the Bolts have one of the lowest turnover rates in defensive zones.

Edmonton, meanwhile, leads the league in offensive production, averaging close to 3.5 goals per game. Their power play hovers around 30% which is not just effective, it’s game-changing.

This series would hinge on pace. If Edmonton pushes games into track meets, the numbers favor them. If Tampa Bay slows it down, history—and efficiency—favor the Lightning.

Don’t be salty#LetsGoOilerspic.twitter.com/7R66gkKu9P

— Edmonton Oilers (@EdmontonOilers) March 25, 2026

Sabres vs. Ducks: Growth, Quantified

The numbers behind Buffalo and Anaheim point to something larger than promise—they point to arrival.

Buffalo has increased its scoring output to 3.43 goals per game, a significant jump from recent seasons. More importantly, their goal differential has turned positive, signaling a shift from rebuilding to competing.

Anaheim’s improvement shows in shot generation and transition speed. They’ve on pace to reduce their shots against by nearly 300 this season, while increasing high-danger scoring chances.

Neither team is statistically dominant—but both are trending upward.

And in a league defined by timing, trajectory matters. Ducks-Sabres would be a heartwarming Stanley Cup Finals if the two teams were to make Cinderella-esque runs.

Waking up with the WWW #FlyTogetherpic.twitter.com/0MrCRFg1pQ

— Anaheim Ducks (@AnaheimDucks) March 25, 2026

The Takeaway

The numbers reinforce what the standings suggest: there is no runaway favorite Stanley Cup Finals matchup.

Multiple teams rank in the top five across key categories—goal differential, special teams, and scoring efficiency. Historically, that kind of distribution leads to unpredictable postseason outcomes.

The difference this year may not be who is best, but who is best at the right time.

The post What Are Some of the Most Likely Stanley Cup Finals Matchups? appeared first on The Lead.

Report: President Donald Trump forms committees of college coaches, athletic directors, more to push for college sports reform

© Matthew Emmons-Imagn Images

Earlier this month, United States President Donald Trump hosted the “Saving College Sports” roundtable at the White House. NCAA president Charlie Baker, numerous conference commissioners, and several collegiate coaches attended the event.

Just weeks later, Trump has formed five separate committees to cover legislation, rules, NCAA reform, media, and player issues. Per CBS Sports, meetings are expected to begin next week.

The committees are made up of former players, University Athletic Directors and Presidents, figures from in and around professional sports, and more. A few of the most notable names include former Alabama head coach Nick Saban, former Ohio State head coach Urban Meyer, and 15-time Majors Champion Tiger Woods.

All five committees, and the list of their members, are below.

Legislative Committee

Pete BevacquaNotre Dame Athletic Director
Cody CampbellTexas Tech System Board of Regents chairman
Bryson DeChambeauLIV Golf player
Ron DeSantisGovernor of Florida
Sarah HirshlandUSOPC CEO
Jonathan KraftNew England Patriots President
Randy LevineNew York Yankees President
Condoleezza RiceFormer U.S. Secretary of State
Nick SabanCollege Football Hall of Fame coach
Adam SilverNBA Commissioner

Rules Committee

Val AckermanBig East Commissioner
Pete BevacquaNotre Dame Athletic Director
Charlie BakerNCAA President
Mack BrownCollege Football Hall of Fame coach
Joe CastiglioneFormer Oklahoma Athletic Director
John CurrieWake Forest Athletic Director
Jeremiah DickeyBoise State Athletic Director
Scott DolsonIndiana Athletic Director
Jonathan KraftNew England Patriots President
Lou LamorielloFormer NHL General Manager
Urban MeyerCollege Football Hall of Fame coach
Tim PernettiAAC Commissioner
Jim PhillipsACC Commissioner
Jamie PollardIowa State Athletic Director
Condoleezza RiceFormer U.S. Secretary of State
Greg SankeySEC Commissioner
Nick SabanCollege Football Hall of Fame coach
Tony PetittiBig Ten Commissioner
Brett YormarkBig 12 Commissioner

*player reps will be added

NCAA Reform Committee

Pete BevacquaNotre Dame Athletic Director
David BlitzerBlackstone co-head of private equity
Cody CampbellTexas Tech System Board of Regents chairman
Jay Clayton U.S. Attorney
Ron DeSantisGovernor of Florida
Boris EpshteynPolitical strategist
Marc GanisSportsCorp President
Gerry Cardinale/Rob KelinRedBird Capital
John DonahoeStanford Athletic Director
Randy LevineNew York Yankees President
Tim PernettiAAC Commissioner
Jim PhillipsACC Commissioner
Tony PetittiBig Ten Commissioner
Stephen RossMiami Dolphins owner
Adam SilverNBA Commissioner
Jack SwarbrickFormer Notre Dame Athletic Director
Brett YormarkBig 12 Commissioner
Greg SankeySEC Commissioner

Media Committee

Pete BevacquaNotre Dame Athletic Director
David BlitzerBlackstone co-head of private equity
Cody CampbellTexas Tech System Board of Regents chairman
Gerry CardinaleRedBird Capital founder and managing partner
Jay ClaytonU.S. Attorney
Boris EpshteynPolitical strategist
Marc GanisSportsCorp President
Tim PernettiAAC Commissioner
Tony PetittiBig Ten Commissioner
Jim PhillipsACC Commissioner
James PitaroESPN Chairman
Greg SankeySEC Commissioner
Eric ShanksFOX Sports CEO
Brett YormarkBig 12 Commissioner

Player Issues Committee

Bryson DeChambeauLIV Golf player
Rob KleinIMG
Lou LamorielloFormer NHL general manager
Seth LevinsonACES Baseball co-founder and agent
Tim TebowFormer Heisman Trophy winner
Charlie WardFormer Heisman Trophy winner
Tiger WoodsPGA Tour player

*Player agent reps will be added

President’s Oversight Committee

Cody CampbellTexas Tech System Board of Regents chairman
Ron DeSantisGovernor of Florida
Douglas GirodKansas Chancellor
Jeffrey GoldNebraska Chancellor
James ClementsFormer Clemson President
Randy LevineNew York Yankees President
Jere MoreheadGeorgia President
Donde PlowmanTennessee Chancellor
Taylor RandallUtah President
Lee RobertsNorth Carolina Chancellor

College Basketball TV Ratings: Most-watched 1st, 2nd round games of 2026 NCAA Tournament

Ken Blaze | Imagn Images

Through the first two rounds of the 2026 NCAA Tournament, CBS and TNT Sports have seen a surge in viewership. The Round of 32 game between St. John’s and Kansas led the charge.

On3 obtained Nielsen Big Data + Panel data for the Rounds of 64 and 32 to start March Madness. St. John’s victory over Kansas was the only game to top 10 million viewers, averaging 10.58 million on CBS. In fact, CBS had nine of the Top 10 most-watched games of the 2026 NCAA Tournament to date.

SUBSCRIBE to the On3 NIL and Sports Business Newsletter

All told, CBS and TNT Sports said viewership is up 7% from last year with an average of 10.1 million viewers through the first two rounds. Here are the most-watched college basketball games from the Rounds of 64 and 32, according to Nielsen Big Data + Panel TV ratings data.

St. John’s vs. Kansas (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 22, 5:15 p.m. ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 10.58 million

St. John’s victory over Kansas led the TV ratings charge and is the most-watched men’s college basketball game of the season to date. An average of 10.58 million viewers tuned to CBS as the Red Storm took down the Jayhawks on a buzzer-beating shot by Dylan Darling in the Round of 32.

Kentucky vs. Iowa State (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 22, 2:40 p.m. ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 9.79 million

Early in the Round of 32 matchup against Iowa State, it looked like Kentucky had an upset on its mind. But the Cyclones hit the gas and didn’t look back as they advanced to the Sweet Sixteen, and more than 9.79 million viewers tuned in for the game.

TCU vs. Duke (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 21, 5:15 p.m. ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 9.55 million

After surviving Siena in the first round, Duke again faced an upset scare in the second round against TCU. But Cameron Boozer and the Blue Devils prevailed to keep their season alive. An average of 9.55 million viewers tuned in for the thrilling round of 32 matchup.

Louisville vs. Michigan State (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 21, 2:40 p.m. ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 8.47 million

As Michigan State secured a second straight trip to the Sweet Sixteen for the first time in a decade, Louisville kept things fairly close. The Spartans’ 77-69 win averaged 8.47 million viewers on CBS in the afternoon window on Saturday, becoming the fourth-most watched game of the 2026 NCAA Tournament so far.

Miami (FL) vs. Purdue (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 22, Noon ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 6.83 million

Miami (FL) didn’t make things easy on Purdue and took a 40-38 lead into halftime of the Round of 32. But the Boilermakers flipped the script in the second half as they advanced to the Sweet Sixteen with the victory in front of 6.83 million viewers.

Saint Louis vs. Michigan (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 21, Noon ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 6.25 million

Following a dominant performance against Georgia in the first round, Saint Louis made things interesting in the first half against Michigan. But in the second half, the Wolverines found their stridge as they came away with the 95-72 victory in front of 6.25 million viewers on average.

VCU vs. Illinois (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 21, 8 p.m. ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 5.65 million

Fresh off an upset victory over North Carolina in the first round, VCU was hoping lightning would strike twice. But Illinois’ high-powered offense didn’t leave any room for doubt as the Fighting Illini secured another Sweet Sixteen trip with a 76-55 victory over the Rams in the Round of 32.

Siena vs. Duke (Round of 64)

Date/Time: March 19, 2:50 p.m. ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 5.43 million

Although Siena didn’t make a sub through the first 39 minutes, the Saints gave Duke all they could handle. The Blue Devils eventually got the 71-65 win to avoid an upset in the 1-seed vs. 16-seed game, led by another double-double from Cameron Boozer.

Iowa vs. Florida (Round of 32)

Date/Time: March 22, 7 p.m. ET
Channel: TBS
Viewers: 5.14 million

TBs’ most-watched game of the 2026 NCAA Tournament so far featured the biggest upset of March Madness through the first two rounds. Iowa defeated reigning national champion and 1-seeded Florida in the Round of 32, drawing a huge college basketball TV ratings win with 5.14 million viewers tuning in for the matchup.

Santa Clara vs. Kentucky (Round of 64)

Date/Time: March 20, Noon ET
Channel: CBS
Viewers: 4.999 million

Kentucky’s two 2026 NCAA Tournament games appeared in the Top 10 most-watched games of the first two rounds. Otega Oweh’s buzzer-beater sent the Round of 64 game against Santa Clara to overtime, and the Wildcats were able to secure the victory in the extra period and advance to the second round. Nearly 5 million people watched the thrilling matchup, which started Friday’s slate of games.

More most-watched 1st, 2nd-round games

Round of 64: TCU vs. Ohio State (March 19, Noon ET, CBS) – 4.62 million
Round of 64: Howard vs. Michigan (March 19, 7:15 p.m. ET, CBS) – 4.52 million
Round of 64: VCU vs. North Carolina (March 19, 6:40 p.m. ET, TNT) – 4.30 million
Round of 64: Iowa vs. Clemson (March 19, 6:40 p.m. ET, TNT) – 4.23 million
Round of 32: Tennessee vs. Virginia (March 22, 6 p.m. ET, TNT) – 4.00 million
Round of 32: UCLA vs. UConn (March 22, 9 p.m. ET, TNT) – 3.98 million
Round of 32: Vanderbilt vs. Nebraska (March 21, 8:50 p.m. ET, TNT) – 3.77 million
Round of 64: Saint Louis vs. Georgia (March 19, 10 p.m. ET, CBS) – 3.43 million
Round of 64: High Point vs. Arkansas (March 21, 9:40 p.m. ET, TBS) – 3.28 million
Round of 64: Tennessee State vs. Iowa State (March 20, 3 p.m. ET, CBS) – 3.12 million
Round of 64: UNI vs. St. John’s (March 20, 7:15 p.m. ET, CBS) – 3.01 million
Round of 64: Texas vs. BYU (March 19, 7:30 p.m. ET, TBS) – 2.97 million
Round of 64: Cal Baptist vs. Kansas (March 20, 10 p.m. ET, CBS) – 2.89 million

With the first two rounds in the books, it’s on to the Sweet Sixteen. Games get underway Thursday night as teams look to secure spots in their respective regional finals.

❌