Reading view

AAF rəsmisi Batumiyə nə üçün gedib?

Gürcüstanın Batumi şəhərində Avropa Ağırlıqqaldırma Federasiyasının növbəti konqresi keçirilir.

Futbolpress.az xəbər verir ki, konqresdə ölkəmizi AAF-nin vitse-prezidenti, Beynəlxalq Ağırlıqqaldırma Federasiyasının “Məsləhət Qrupu”nun üzvü Firdovsi Umudov təmsil edir. Əvvəlcə EWF-in prezidenti Astrit Hasani çıxış edərək konqresin proqramını diqqətə çatdırıb və illik hesabatı təqdim edib. Audit hesabatlarının təsdiqindən sonra 2026 və 2027-ci illərdə baş tutacaq yarışlarla bağlı məlumatlar iştirakçıların diqqətinə çatdırılıb. Daha sonra Avropa Ağırlıqqaldırma Federasiyasında boş qalan vəzifə yerlərinə növbədənkənar seçkilər keçirilib.

Azərbaycan Ağırlıqqaldırma Federasiyasının vitse-prezidenti Firdovsi Umudov konqresdə iştirakı çərçivəsində EWF-in prezidenti Astrit Hasani, qurumun Baş katibi Milan Mixayloviç, eləcə də Gürcüstan Ağırlıqqaldırma Federasiyasının prezidenti Laşa Talaxadze ilə görüşüb. Təmaslar zamanı yarışların təşkili, qaydalardakı yeniliklər və ikitərəfli əlaqələr ətrafında fikir mübadiləsi aparılıb.

College Football Win Totals: Brad Powers' Best Bets for 2026

Want to get more Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account here.

If you saw my column last week, you now know how to build a college football power rating.

This week, I'll show you how to use those power ratings and attack the 2026 college football win totals.

Keep reading to see why I like the Georgia Bulldogs to produce another solid season.

Brad Powers' college football win total betting system

Many novice bettors simply look at a schedule and start counting, "win, win, loss, win, toss-up, loss, etc." While that method can lead to a very basic win total projections, it can sometimes be inaccurate, especially for teams that have a bunch of games with single-digit projected point spreads.

I use a little more complicated method where I get a projected point spread for each game, and then assign a win percentage chance for each game coinciding with how small or large the point spread is. I then add up those 12 win percentages (decimals) and get a projected win total.

To get a projected point spread, simply subtract the two power ratings for a neutral field point spread, or subtract the two numbers while adding homefield advantage (generally around three points) for a normal game. 

For example, my final power ratings for last year had Indiana No. 1 at 96.40 and Ohio State No. 2 at 92.65. Using these numbers, Indiana would be around a 3.5 to 4-point favorite vs. Ohio State on a neutral field (96.4 - 92.65 = 3.75).

Factoring in home field, you would be looking at Indiana being around at 6.5 to 7-point favorite at home vs. Ohio State, and around a 0.5-point to 1-point favorites at Ohio State. This would yield very different win percentages.  

Projected point spreads near “pick-em” obviously would equate to a 50% (or 0.5 in decimal format) chance of winning. Therefore, you would give that team credit for a 0.5-win.

A 12-game schedule with every game projected at “pick-em” would yield of projected win total of 6. (0.5 times 12 = 6). In the above example, Indiana playing Ohio State or a team similar on the road all 12 games (Hoosiers again projected to be very slight 0.5 to 1-point favorites) would yield a win total projection of 6.24.

How did I get that number? Typically, 1-point favorites win about 52% of the time, so 0.52 multiplied by 12 equals 6.24.

However, if you use the example of Indiana being a 6.5 to 7-point favorite at home vs. Ohio State, you’d get a much higher projected win total.

Typically, 6.5 to 7-point favorites win about 67% of the time. Therefore, a 12-game schedule with those win percentages in each game would yield a win total projection of 8.04 (0.67 times 12 = 8.04).

Obviously, schedules aren’t that simple and will feature a wide variety of point spreads. The best way to show you how this works further would be to give you an example schedule with all different point spreads and win percentages.

Game

Projected Spread

Win % 

Game 1

-21

0.93

Game 2

-3

0.59

Game 3

-7

0.68

Game 4

3

0.41

Game 5

-10

0.74

Game 6

-14

0.83

Game 7

7

0.32

Game 8

-17

0.9

Game 9

7

0.32

Game 10

-3

0.59

Game 11

10

0.26

Game 12

-10

0.74

Projected Win Total

--

7.31

A 21-point favorite typically wins 93% of the time in college football, so instead of using a full-win, I use 0.93. However, 3-point underdogs only win about 41% of the time. Instead of giving that team a loss, I award them 0.41 of a win.

Someone using the simple “win, win, loss, etc.” method would likely come up with an 8-4 projected record (team wins all eight games they are favored in, loses all four games as an underdog). However, assigning a specific win percentage to each point spread and adding all 12 decimals up would equate to a win total of 7.31. Big difference.

I hope that helps, and by using that method, these are my three favorite win total bets for the upcoming season as of right now.

2026 college football win total picks

Georgia Georgia Over 9.5 wins (-160 at BetMGM)

My power ratings are currently projecting 10.0 wins for the Georgia Bulldogs

I project Georgia to be favored in all 12 games by at least a field goal, and nine of those games by double-digits. Unlike the past couple of seasons, Georgia does not play likely preseason No. 1 Texas, and I expect both Alabama and Mississippi to take a step back this season.

When tying up bankroll for several months, you often want a trusted commodity with low variance. Georgia has not lost three games in a regular season since 2016, which was Kirby Smart’s first season. Speaking of Smart, he returns for his 11th season in Athens along with both of his coordinators, who have been there several seasons.

Georgia ranks No. 8 in Bill Connelly's returning production, which is the best mark in the Smart era. The Bulldogs return starting QB Gunner Stockton and 16 of their 21 defenders who logged at least 150 snaps last year.

Even in back-to-back “down seasons” compared to recent Georgia teams, the Bulldogs have managed to win the SEC Championship each year. I think this year’s team is better and has an easier slate.

Ohio State Ohio State Over 9.5 wins (-160 at FanDuel)

My power ratings are currently projecting 10.1 wins. and I see the Ohio State Buckeyes favored in all 12 games.

The Buckeyes do play five teams ranked in my Top 15 (at Texas, at Indiana, at USC, Oregon, and Michigan) and it is arguably the toughest regular season schedule in Ohio State's history. However, the Buckeyes welcome back eight starters on offense, led by the best player in the country in WR Jeremiah Smith.

They also return starting QB Julian Sayin and welcome in four transfers who were starters at other FBS programs last year.

I think it’s safe to assume the Buckeyes will easily have one of the best offenses in the country. They also have eight players on defense who were full-time starters at the FBS level last year.

Similar to Georgia, Ohio State is a remarkably consistent program. With the exception of 2011 (then head coach Jim Tressel was fired in May, and their Top 5 players were suspended), Ohio State has not lost three games in a regular season since 2004. That's 20 straight seasons of cashing this total.

Yes, you’re paying some heavy juice with this bet, but remember a 0.5-win is worth around 70 cents in college football (50 cents in NFL). I would argue at the top (win totals of 9.5 or more) or at the bottom (win totals of 3.5 or less), each 0.5-win is worth even more than 70 cents as there are not as many games in question.


More college football resources from Covers


Michigan Michigan Under 8.5 wins (-130 at BetMGM)

The Michigan Wolverines managed a 9-3 regular season last year with a disgraced Sherrone Moore as head coach. Now they welcome in the much more respected and experienced Kyle Whittingham from Utah, who managed a 10-2 regular season record last year. 

Right now, I have Michigan projected as a Top 15 team in our power ratings, yet I still like the Under here.

First, those same power ratings that have them as a Top 15 team are also currently projecting only 7.7 wins. The Wolverines play one of the most difficult schedules in the country, including six games against teams in my Top 25 (Oklahoma, Iowa, Penn State, Indiana, at Oregon, and at Ohio State).

I project Michigan to be close to a TD underdog at home vs, Indiana, and a double-digit underdog on the road at Oregon and at Ohio State. I don’t expect wins in any of those three games. Therefore, in order to lose this bet, Michigan would have to run the table as a single-digit favorite vs. Oklahoma, Iowa, at Minnesota, and Penn State, while also taking care of business in the other five games.

I think that is too tall an order for a Michigan team in transition. The Wolverines are also inexperienced on defense, losing 13 of their 18 players who logged at least 300 snaps last season. 

I will have more season win total best bets as the season approaches, and the Group of 6 numbers start to get posted.

More about Brad Powers

For those that don’t know me, I wanted to be involved in sports journalism nearly my entire life — even going so far as to get a broadcast journalism degree from Bowling Green.

The problem was, at the time (20 years ago), the newspaper industry was shrinking, and there wasn’t much opportunity in doing entry-level sports radio... so I got a job at Phil Steele Publications, which is best known for its college football preview magazine.

While in-depth college football coverage was my true passion, I soon found out what really pays the bills: And that's when sports betting entered my life. During my six years there, I received crash courses on how to handicap, building power ratings, how to market, and more.

What I didn’t learn was how to bet — which requires a different skill set — so I moved to Las Vegas, which at the time, was the only place in the country where you could legally wager on sports.

For the next decade, I was heavily involved in day-to-day betting, with an emphasis on college football and the NFL, and was involved with several sports betting shows and podcasts on networks such as Fox Sports Radio, ESPN Radio, and VSiN.

Now... here I am, still doing all of the above — but from my beloved farm in Ohio.

This article originally appeared on Covers.com, read the full article here and view our best betting sites or check out our top sportsbook promos.

These are college football's eight biggest QB competitions. Who has edge?

Quarterback competitions aren’t what they used to be.

The amount of player movement at quarterback every winter has removed much of the guesswork from these offseason battles, given that many quarterbacks simply hop into the transfer portal rather than roll the dice on losing a competition and a year of eligibility.

But there are a few high-profile contests underway this spring in the Power Four, including at potential College Football Playoff contenders in Alabama, Clemson and Tennessee.

Heading into a crucial season, Crimson Tide coach Kalen DeBoer is evaluating two highly talented but unproven contenders in redshirt sophomore Austin Mack and true freshman Keelon Russell. The latter made a late move with 240 yards and four touchdowns in the Tide’s spring game.

These eight competitions are worth monitoring as the Bowl Subdivision gets ready for the summer:

Alabama

Contenders: Austin Mack, Keelon Russell.

Mack looked the part of Alabama’s next starter after coming in for Ty Simpson during the tail end of a Rose Bowl loss to Indiana in last year’s playoff quarterfinals. He completed 11 of 16 attempts against the Hoosiers and went 24 of 32 for 228 years on the season. Russell was a top-level recruit who played in just two games in 2025 and preserved his redshirt. Mack has the edge in overall experience and in his experience in the scheme after following DeBoer from Washington. But Russell winning the battle would come as no surprise.

Austin Mack or Keelon Russell? The latest intel on Alabama's QB competition

Clemson

Clemson quarterback Christopher Vizzina (17) throws near running back Chris Johnson Jr (16) during the first half at the annnual Clemson Orange and White spring game at Memorial Stadium in Clemson, South Carolina Saturday, March 28, 2026.

Contenders: Brock Bradley, Chris Denson, Trent Pearman, Tait Reynolds, Christopher Vizzina.

Vizzina is the heavy favorite coming out of the spring after spending the past two seasons as Cade Klubnik’s backup and going for 317 yards and three touchdowns as the starter in last year’s loss to SMU. Reynolds, a freshman, has ascended into the backup role. That could result in Denson moving away from quarterback this season. Reynolds has a shot at unseating Vizzina heading into the opener but is more likely to earn an in-season promotion if the passing game sputters.

Tennessee

Contenders: Faizon Brandon, George MacIntyre.

The talent may be obvious, but neither option inspires huge confidence at this point: MacIntyre is a redshirt freshman who attempted nine passes in 2025 and Brandon is a true freshman, though of the five-star variety. While Josh Heupel’s biggest successes at Tennessee have come with a veteran under center, the Volunteers did make the playoff with then-freshman Nico Iamaleava as the starter.

Florida

Contenders: Tramell Jones Jr., Aaron Philo.

New coach Jon Sumrall has said this competition will extend into fall camp even if Philo seems to be the favorite. He has the edge in experience after making more than 100 attempts across two years at Georgia Tech and has a deeper familiarity with the Gators’ offense under coordinator Buster Faulkner, who held the same position with the Yellow Jackets. Yet Jones outplayed Philo in the final scrimmage and did a better job during the spring of protecting the football.

Duke

Contenders: Walker Eget, Dan Mahan, Ari Patu, Terry Walker III.

Duke lost rising junior and projected starter Darian Mensah to Miami just as the portal closed this winter. In response, the Blue Devils signed San Jose State transfer Walker Eget, who went for 5,555 yards and 30 touchdowns the past two seasons and was granted a sixth year of eligibility by the NCAA. Eget has been slowed by knee surgery, however. That could give Mahan a small window to make a move in this competition; the Blue Devils’ coaches are high on the redshirt freshman.

North Carolina

Contenders: Travis Burgess, Taron Dickens, Billy Edwards Jr., Au’Tori Newkirk, Miles O’Neill.

Well, the Tar Heels definitely have options. Bill Belichick and new offensive coordinator Bobby Petrino could go with Edwards, who has Power Four starting experience but missed all but two games of last season at Wisconsin because of a knee injury. They could roll with Dickens, who put up jaw-dropping numbers at Western Carolina before transferring to Chapel Hill in February. O’Neill looks the part at 6-5 and 220 pounds but needs more seasoning after getting into seven games at Texas A&M as a redshirt freshman in 2025. Newkirk is the only UNC quarterback returning from last season, which probably means nothing. Burgess arrives on campus as a true freshman and is buried on the depth chart, though that could quickly change if the Tar Heels’ season runs off the rails. Anyone who saw Belichick’s debut knows that’s a possibility.

Virginia Tech

Contenders: Ethan Grunkemeyer, Troy Huhn.

The Hokies went into spring workouts with Grunkemeyer as the heavy favorite for the starting job. The sophomore was the primary starter at Penn State last season after Drew Allar's injury and followed former coach James Franklin, joining a quarterback room that lost starter Kyron Drones to graduation and needed an overhaul. But even as Grunkemeyer remains the odds-on pick to start the opener, Tech will enter Saturday’s scrimmage with a tighter competition thanks to Huhn’s strong performance in the spring. A true freshman, Huhn was verbally committed to Penn State but switched to Tech after Franklin was hired.

Iowa

Contenders: Hank Brown, Jeremy Hecklinski.

Former starter Mark Gronowski’s performance last season proved the right kind of quarterback can shine in Iowa coordinator Tim Lester’s scheme. True freshman Tradon Bessinger will arrive this summer and possibly impact the race during preseason camp. But the competition is really centered on two former transfers in Hecklinski (Wake Forest) and Brown (Auburn), who joined the program before last season. Hecklinski took over the backup role from Brown at the midseason point, though both continued to share practice snaps through bowl play.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: College football biggest QB battles this spring in Power Four conferences

Deion Sanders reels in top QB recruit as Colorado loads up at most important position

Deion Sanders has landed another big fish at Colorado. Four-star high school quarterback recruit Andre Adams announced April 14 he has committed to play for Sanders in 2027, making him the newest quarterback of the future in Boulder.

Adams chose Colorado over Florida State, Virginia Tech, Kentucky and Oregon. The dual-threat quarterback played at Antioch High School in Nashville, Tennessee, where he had 71 passing touchdowns and 35 rushing touchdowns in 33 games. He visited the Boulder campus and met with Sanders on April 3.

More: Deion Sanders’ quietest spring yet at Colorado — and why that might be the point

"For my next three to four years, I will be committed to the University of Colorado," Adams said at a news conference in Tennessee, where he wore a Colorado T-shirt and hat as he streamed the announcement on social media.

The 6-2 Adams ranks as the No. 15 national quarterback prospect out of high school for 2027, according to 247Sports Composite, behind Baton Rouge high school quarterback recruit Elijah Haven at No. 1.

How does this fit into Deion Sanders' future plans?

Adams’ commitment to Colorado gives the Buffaloes some options for the future at the most important position on the field, especially considering how so many quarterbacks change schools through the transfer portal. Highly regarded redshirt freshman quarterback Julian “JuJu” Lewis is expected to be the starter at Colorado in 2026 but is one of only three quarterbacks on scholarship right now after the death of walk-on quarterback Dominiq Ponder on March 1.

Here is a look at who they are and how many years of eligibility they have left as the Buffs try to regroup after a 3-9 season in 2025:

∎ Lewis, 18, has four seasons of eligibility remaining after playing in four games in 2025, including two starts. He also was a four-star recruit out of high school in Georgia and chose Colorado over Southern California.

∎ Utah transfer quarterback Isaac Wilson has three years to play three more seasons. He started seven games for the Utes in 2024 as a freshman.

∎ Freshman Kaneal Sweetwyne has five years to play four seasons. He is a dual-threat high school recruit out of Utah and was the No. 1 overall pick in his team’s internal spring player draft.

Sanders just concluded his fourth spring practice season in Boulder and is trying to bounce back from a subpar year at the quarterback position after the departure of his quarterback son Shedeur Sanders to the NFL. The Buffs open the season Sept. 3 at Georgia Tech.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Deion Sanders reels in another big fish with QB recruit Andre Adams

❌