Reading view

UCF football to host FIU in non-conference matchup in 2030

UCF has agreed to host FIU at Acrisure Bounce House Stadium in a non-conference matchup set for Sept. 7, 2030.

The two schools announced the deal on Tuesday as the Knights continue to fill out their future football schedule.

This would be the seventh meeting between the two in-state programs, but the first since Aug. 31, 2017. UCF holds a 4-2 record against the Panthers in the series, with the only losses coming in 2011 (17-10) and 2015 (15-14).

The deal with FIU gives UCF two non-conference opponents for the 2030 season. The Knights are scheduled to host Florida as part of a 2-for-1 deal with the Gators.

UCF athletics director Terry Mohajir previously stated that his non-conference scheduling philosophy would have the Knights face a Power Five opponent, a Group of Five opponent, and a school from the Football Bowl Subdivision.

UCF’s future non-conference schedule is filled through 2029, but there are holes in 2030 (one spot), 2031 (two spots) and 2032 (three spots).

2026

Bethune-Cookman (Sept. 3); At Pittsburgh (Sept. 12); Georgia State (Sept. 19)

2027

At North Carolina (Sept. 4); UT-Martin (Sept. 11); Louisiana (Sept. 18)

2028

Maine (Aug. 31); At Northwestern (Sept. 9); FAU (Sept. 16)

2029

James Madison (Sept. 8); Pittsburgh (Sept. 15);  UMass (TBD)

2030

FIU (Sept. 7); Florida (Sept. 14); TBD

2031

Northwestern (Sept. 6); TBD; TBD

2032

TBD; TBD; TBD

2033

At Florida (Sept. 3)

Matt Murschel can be reached at mmurschel@orlandosentinel.com

7 digital PR secrets behind strong SEO performance

7 digital PR secrets behind strong SEO performance

Digital PR is about to matter more than ever. Not because it’s fashionable, or because agencies have rebranded link building with a shinier label, but because the mechanics of search and discovery are changing. 

Brand mentions, earned media, and the wider PR ecosystem are now shaping how both search engines and large language models understand brands. That shift has serious implications for how SEO professionals should think about visibility, authority, and revenue.

At the same time, informational search traffic is shrinking. Fewer people are clicking through long blog posts written to target top-of-funnel keywords. 

The commercial value in search is consolidating around high-intent queries and the pages that serve them: product pages, category pages, and service pages. Digital PR sits right at the intersection of these changes.

What follows are seven practical, experience-led secrets that explain how digital PR actually works when it’s done well, and why it’s becoming one of the most important tools in SEOs’ toolkit.

Secret 1: Digital PR can be a direct sales activation channel

Digital PR is usually described as a link tactic, a brand play or, more recently, as a way to influence generative search and AI outputs.

All of that’s true. What’s often overlooked is that digital PR can also drive revenue directly.

When a brand appears in a relevant media publication, it’s effectively placing itself in front of buyers while they are already consuming related information.

This is not passive awareness. It’s targeted exposure during a moment of consideration.

Platforms like Google are exceptionally good at understanding user intent, interests and recency. Anyone who has looked at their Discover feed after researching a product category has seen this in action. 

Digital PR taps into the same behavioral reality. You are not broadcasting randomly. You are appearing where buyers already are.

Two things tend to happen when this is executed well.

  • If your site already ranks for a range of relevant queries, your brand gains additional recognition in nontransactional contexts. Readers see your name attached to a credible story or insight. That familiarity matters.
  • More importantly, that exposure drives brand search and direct clicks. Some readers click straight through from the article. Others search for your brand shortly after. In both cases, they enter your marketing funnel with a level of trust that generic search traffic rarely has.

This effect is driven by basic behavioral principles such as recency and familiarity. While it’s difficult to attribute cleanly in analytics, the commercial impact is very real. 

We see this most clearly in direct-to-consumer, finance, and health markets, where purchase cycles are active and intent is high.

Digital PR is not just about supporting sales. In the right conditions, it’s part of the sales engine.

Dig deeper: Discoverability in 2026: How digital PR and social search work together

Secret 2: The mere exposure effect is one of digital PR’s biggest advantages

One of the most consistent patterns in successful digital PR campaigns is repetition.

When a brand appears again and again in relevant media coverage, tied to the same themes, categories, or areas of expertise, it builds familiarity. 

That familiarity turns into trust, and trust turns into preference. This is known as the mere exposure effect, and it’s fundamental to how brands grow.

In practice, this often happens through syndicated coverage. A strong story picked up by regional or vertical publications can lead to dozens of mentions across different outlets. 

Historically, many SEOs undervalued this type of coverage because the links were not always unique or powerful on their own.

That misses the point.

What this repetition creates is a dense web of co-occurrences. Your brand name repeatedly appears alongside specific topics, products, or problems. This influences how people perceive you, but it also influences how machines understand you.

For search engines and large language models alike, frequency and consistency of association matter. 

An always-on digital PR approach, rather than sporadic big hits, is one of the fastest ways to increase both human and algorithmic familiarity with a brand.

Secret 3: Big campaigns come with big risk, so diversification matters

Large, creative digital PR campaigns are attractive. They are impressive, they generate internal excitement, and they often win industry praise. The problem is that they also concentrate risk.

A single large campaign can succeed spectacularly, or it can fail quietly. From an SEO perspective, many widely celebrated campaigns underperform because they do not generate the links or mentions that actually move rankings.

This happens for a simple reason. What marketers like is not always what journalists need.

Journalists are under pressure to publish quickly, attract attention, and stay relevant to their audience. 

If a campaign is clever but difficult to translate into a story, it will struggle. If all your budget’s tied up in one idea, you have no fallback.

A diversified digital PR strategy spreads investment across multiple smaller campaigns, reactive opportunities, and steady background activity. 

This increases the likelihood of consistent coverage and reduces dependence on any single idea working perfectly.

In digital PR, reliability often beats brilliance.

Dig deeper: How to build search visibility before demand exists

Get the newsletter search marketers rely on.


Secret 4: The journalist’s the customer

One of the most common mistakes in digital PR is forgetting who the gatekeeper is.

From a brand’s perspective, the goal might be links, mentions, or authority. 

From a journalist’s perspective, the goal is to write a story that interests readers and performs well. These goals overlap, but they are not the same.

The journalist decides whether your pitch lives or dies. In that sense, they are the customer.

Effective digital PR starts by understanding what makes a journalist’s job easier. 

That means providing clear angles, credible data, timely insights, and fast responses. Think about relevance before thinking about links.

When you help journalists do their job well, they reward you with exposure. 

That exposure carries weight in search engines and in the training data that informs AI systems. The exchange is simple: value for value.

Treat journalists as partners, not as distribution channels.

Secret 5: Product and category page links are where SEO value is created

Not all links are equal.

From an SEO standpoint, links to product, category, and core service pages are often far more valuable than links to blog content. Unfortunately, they are also the hardest links to acquire through traditional outreach.

This is where digital PR excels.

Because PR coverage is contextual and editorial, it allows links to be placed naturally within discussions of products, services, or markets. When done correctly, this directs authority to the pages that actually generate revenue.

As informational content becomes less central to organic traffic growth, this matters even more.

Ranking improvements on high-intent pages can have a disproportionate commercial impact.

A relatively small number of high-quality, relevant links can outperform a much larger volume of generic links pointed at top-of-funnel content.

Digital PR should be planned with these target pages in mind from the outset.

Dig deeper: How to make ecommerce product pages work in an AI-first world

Secret 6: Entity lifting is now a core outcome of digital PR

Search engines have long made it clear that context matters. The text surrounding a link, and the way a brand is described, help define what that brand represents.

This has become even more important with the rise of large language models. These systems process information in chunks, extracting meaning from surrounding text rather than relying solely on links.

When your brand is mentioned repeatedly in connection with specific topics, products, or expertise, it strengthens your position as an entity in that space. This is what’s often referred to as entity lifting.

The effect goes beyond individual pages. Brands see ranking improvements for terms and categories that were not directly targeted, simply because their overall authority has increased. 

At the same time, AI systems are more likely to reference and summarize brands that are consistently described as relevant sources.

Digital PR is one of the most scalable ways to build this kind of contextual understanding around a brand.

Secret 7: Authority comes from relevant sources and relevant sections

Former Google engineer Jun Wu discusses this in his book “The Beauty of Mathematics in Computer Science,” explaining that authority emerges from being recognized as a source within specific informational hubs. 

In practical terms, this means that where you are mentioned matters as much as how big the site is.

A link or mention from a highly relevant section of a large publication can be more valuable than a generic mention on the homepage. For example, a targeted subfolder on a major media site can carry strong authority, even if the domain as a whole covers many subjects.

Effective digital PR focuses on two things: 

  • Publications that are closely aligned with your industry and sections.
  • Subfolders that are tightly connected to the topic you want to be known for.

This is how authority is built in a way that search engines and AI systems both recognize.

Dig deeper: The new SEO imperative: Building your brand

Where digital PR now fits in SEO

Digital PR is no longer a supporting act to SEO. It’s becoming central to how brands are discovered, understood, and trusted.

As informational traffic declines and high-intent competition intensifies, the brands that win will be those that combine relevance, repetition, and authority across earned media. 

Digital PR, done properly, delivers all three.

South Dakota Prep Media basketball polls for Feb. 2: De Smet takes over No. 1 ranking for Class B boys

Feb. 2—A familiar face is back on top of the Class B boys rankings in the latest South Dakota Prep Media basketball polls, released Monday.

De Smet, the Class B three-peat state champions from 2021-23 with runner-up finishes in 2019 and 2024, grabbed control of the No. 1 ranking this week for the first time since Dec. 18, 2023. The Bulldogs collected 13 of 22 available first-place votes this week as one of four teams to receive consideration for the top spot.

No. 2 Castlewood nabbed five top votes, with previously top-ranked Viborg-Hurley at No. 3 with three top votes. No. 4 Freeman got one vote for the top spot.

Viborg-Hurley had been No. 1 since Jan. 5, standing atop the rankings for three editions of the poll. The Cougars were bumped from the top spot following back-to-back losses, first to Class A power Hamlin at the Hanson Classic, then by Region 4B foe Centerville. Notably, Viborg-Hurley is still first in the Class B seed-point standings, with De Smet in second.

Elsewhere in the Class B top 10, Parkston and Wessington Springs traded places at No. 7 and No. 8, respectively, while Deubrook Area and Sully Buttes did the same at No. 9 and No. 10.

Here is a breakdown of the latest rankings.

The South Dakota Prep Media basketball polls for the week of Feb. 2, 2026, are listed below. First-place votes are indicated in parentheses and teams are ranked by total points received.

1. Sioux Falls Lincoln (22), 12-0, 110; 2. Sioux Falls Roosevelt, 11-1, 84; 3. Watertown, 11-1, 46; 4. Harrisburg, 8-3, 43; 5. Huron, 9-3, 17.

Others receiving votes: Tea Area 16, Spearfish 14.

Moved up: No. 3 Watertown (from No. 5), No. 5 Huron (from receiving votes).

Moved down: Spearfish (from No. 3).

1. West Central (21), 15-0, 219; 2. Sioux Falls Christian (1), 11-1, 198; 3. Clark/Willow Lake, 13-2, 173; 4. Hamlin, 10-2, 146; 5. St. Thomas More, 9-3, 133; 6. Lennox, 7-5, 91; 7. Vermillion, 9-4, 86; 8. Mahpiya Luta, 12-2, 59; 9. Groton Area, 9-4, 46; 10. Cheyenne-Eagle Butte, 8-2, 18.

Others receiving votes: Pine Ridge 15, Flandreau 8, Stanley County 8, Sioux Valley 5, Dakota Valley 1, Wagner 1.

Moved up: No. 5 St. Thomas More (from No. 7), No. 7 Vermillion (from No. 9), No. 10 Cheyenne-Eagle Butte (from receiving votes).

Moved down: No. 8 Mahpiya Luta (from No. 5), No. 9 Groton Area (from No. 8), Stanley County (from No. 10).

1. De Smet (13), 10-2, 209; 2. Castlewood (5), 12-2, 192; 3. Viborg-Hurley (3), 12-2, 182; 4. Freeman (1), 12-2, 155; 5. Wall, 11-3, 134; 6. Aberdeen Christian, 9-2, 90; 7. Parkston, 12-2, 75; 8. Wessington Springs, 10-4, 68; 9. Deubrook Area, 10-2, 44; 10. Sully Buttes, 9-4, 23.

Others receiving votes: Estelline/Hendricks 16, Lyman 10, Sanborn Central/Woonsocket 7, Leola/Frederick Area 4, Bridgewater-Emery 2, Centerville 2.

Moved up: No. 1 De Smet (from No. 2), No. 2 Castlewood (from No. 3), No. 7 Parkston (from No. 8), No. 9 Deubrook Area (from No. 10).

Moved down: No. 3 Viborg-Hurley (from No. 1), No. 8 Wessington Springs (from No. 7), No. 10 Sully Buttes (from No. 9).

1. Brandon Valley (22), 11-0, 110; 2. O'Gorman, 10-1, 88; 3. Sioux Falls Washington, 10-1, 66; 4. Rapid City Stevens, 11-2, 31; 5. Aberdeen Central, 9-4, 30.

Others receiving votes: Mitchell 4, Sioux Falls Jefferson 1.

Moved up: No. 4 RC Stevens (from No. 5).

Moved down: No. 5 Aberdeen Central (from No. 4).

1. Mahpiya Luta (22), 14-0, 220; 2. Hamlin, 11-1, 193; 3. Lennox, 13-2, 168; 4. Wagner, 11-2, 160; 5. Sioux Falls Christian, 11-3, 131; 6. Clark/Willow Lake, 11-1, 101; 7. Sioux Valley, 11-2, 99; 8. Aberdeen Roncalli, 11-2, 55; 9. Rapid City Christian, 14-2, 41; 10. St. Thomas More, 11-3, 18.

Others receiving votes: Mobridge-Pollock 14, West Central 7, Lakota Tech 3.

Moved up: No. 2 Hamlin (from No. 3), No. 5 SF Christian (from No. 6), No. 6 Clark/Willow Lake (from No. 7), No. 8 Aberdeen Roncalli (from No. 9), No. 9 RC Christian (from receiving votes), No. 10 St. Thomas More (from receiving votes).

Moved down: No. 3 Lennox (from No. 2), No. 7 Sioux Valley (from No. 5), West Central (from No. 8), Lakota Tech (from No. 10).

1. Lyman (20), 13-0, 217; 2. Parkston, 12-1, 188; 3. Bennett County (2), 10-2, 177; T-4. Colman-Egan, 13-0, 140; T-4. Ethan, 10-1, 140; 6. Centerville, 13-2, 113; 7. Sanborn Central/Woonsocket, 12-1, 91; 8. Chester, 12-2, 58; 9. Harding County, 14-1, 32; 10. Corsica-Stickney, 9-3, 28.

Others receiving votes: Gayville-Volin 16, Waubay/Summit 7, Highmore-Harrold 3.

Moved up: No. 4 (tie) Colman-Egan (from No. 5), No. 9 Harding County (from No. 10).

Moved down: No. 10 Corsica-Stickney (from No. 8 (tie)).

The in-house vs. agency debate misses the real paid media problem by Focus Pocus Media

For years, conversations about paid media have revolved around one question: should companies build in-house teams or outsource to agencies?

That debate makes sense, but it misses the real issue. The problem isn’t where paid media sits in the org chart. It’s how performance leadership is structured.

Many companies run Google Ads and other paid channels with capable teams, solid budgets, and documented best practices. Campaigns are live. Dashboards are full. Optimizations happen on schedule. Yet:

  • Results stall. 
  • Pipelines flatten. 
  • Budgets get questioned. 
  • Confidence in paid advertising erodes.

This is rarely a talent issue. It’s usually a structural one.

The plateau most in-house teams eventually hit

Across dozens of B2B paid media accounts, from SaaS to service businesses spending five figures a month, we see the same pattern.

Performance does not collapse overnight. It slows gradually.

Campaigns keep running. Costs look stable. Leads still come in. But growth stalls. Leadership sees motion without insight. Decisions turn reactive. Paid media shifts from a growth engine to a cost center that has to defend its existence.

The gap isn’t effort or execution. Over time, strategy narrows when teams work in isolation.

Why ‘more headcount’ rarely fixes the problem

When performance stalls, the default response is to hire. A new specialist. A channel owner. A more senior role.

Extra resources can ease the workload, but headcount alone rarely fixes the real problem. 

In in-house teams, three challenges are consistent:

1. Tracking and leadership visibility

Leadership teams often lack a clear, shared view of how paid media drives pipeline and revenue. The data exists, but it’s scattered across disconnected platforms, tools, and dashboards. 

Without strong integrations, even well-run campaigns operate with weak feedback loops, limiting how much they can improve.

2. Structure and skill ceiling

Many teams try to follow proven best practices. The issue isn’t intent. It’s context. What works for one company or growth stage can be ineffective, or even harmful, for another. 

Without external benchmarks or fresh perspectives, teams struggle to see what actually applies to their business.

3. Lack of systematic testing

Day-to-day execution eats up available capacity. Teams focus on keeping things stable instead of pushing performance forward. Testing starts to feel risky, even though real gains usually come from the few experiments that work.

Over time, this creates the illusion of optimization: steady activity without meaningful progress.

The same mistake happens before ads ever launch

These structural issues don’t just affect companies already running paid media. They often show up earlier, before the first campaigns even launch.

In many B2B organizations, paid advertising enters the picture when growth from outbound sales, partnerships, or organic channels starts to slow. 

Budgets roll out cautiously. Execution gets delegated. Results are expected to emerge from platform defaults.

What’s usually missing is strategic ownership:

  • Clear definitions of success that go beyond surface-level metrics
  • Tracking that ties spend to pipeline, not just lead volume
  • A testing roadmap aligned with revenue goals

Without this foundation, early results disappoint. Budgets get cut. Confidence fades. Paid media gets labeled ineffective before it has a real chance to work.

Ironically, this early phase is where external perspective can deliver the greatest long-term impact. It’s also when companies are least likely to seek it.

The structural advantage of outsourced performance leadership

Outsourcing is often framed as a way to cut costs or add execution power. In reality, its biggest advantage is perspective.

External performance teams work across many accounts, industries, and growth stages. They:

  • Spot patterns earlier. 
  • Know when platform recommendations favor spend growth over business outcomes. 
  • Question assumptions internal teams may have stopped challenging.

That outside view matters most in areas like tracking architecture, platform integrations, and account structure, where partial best-practice adoption can quietly erode performance.

A common scenario looks like this: 

  • Teams follow platform guidance but leave underlying martech gaps unresolved. 
  • Systems don’t talk to each other. 
  • Optimization signals weaken. 
  • Budget efficiency drops, even though campaigns appear fully compliant.

When outsourcing actually works — and when it doesn’t

Outsourcing isn’t a cure-all. It breaks down when companies expect external partners to fix performance in isolation, or when strategy and execution live in separate worlds.

It works best as a hybrid model:

  • Internal teams own execution and business context
  • External experts bring strategic direction, structural resets, and ongoing challenge

In this setup, partners don’t replace teams. They raise the bar.

That’s why a specialized Google Ads agency creates the most value when the goal isn’t just running campaigns, but turning paid media back into a predictable, scalable growth lever.

A smarter model: External strategy, internal execution

High-performing organizations are increasingly separating strategy from execution volume.

They bring in outside expertise not because something is broken, but because they want:

  • Objective assessments of performance and structure.
  • Stronger attribution and tracking foundations.
  • Disciplined experimentation frameworks.
  • Clear accountability at the leadership level.

This approach builds momentum before budgets get cut, not after results decline. It also helps leadership understand why paid media performs the way it does, restoring confidence in the channel.

What high-performing companies do differently

Organizations that avoid long plateaus tend to:

  • Treat paid media as a system, not a standalone channel.
  • Invest early in clear tracking and strong integrations.
  • Invite external challenge before performance slips.
  • Accept that most tests will fail, knowing the few wins will compound.

In this context, outsourcing isn’t about cost efficiency. It’s about preserving strategic sharpness as platforms and markets evolve.

Final thought

The in-house versus outsourced debate reduces a deeper issue: who owns performance direction, and how often it gets challenged?

As paid media platforms automate and evolve, the companies that sustain growth aren’t the ones with the biggest teams. They’re the ones with the clearest perspective.

Steve Millar’s high school boys basketball rankings and player of the week for the Daily Southown

Leo inches upward in the rankings, while football powerhouse Joliet Catholic joins the fold.

Top 10

With records through Sunday and previous rankings in parentheses.

1. Marist 21-4 (1)

Adoni Vassilakis and the RedHawks celebrate senior night with 89-48 win over Dyett.

2. Homewood-Flossmoor 20-3 (2)

Jeffrey Cade steps up with 14 points as Vikings hold off tough Loyola team 66-61.

3. Lockport 19-4 (3)

In third try against Homewood-Flossmoor, Grady Ruane and Porters pull off 60-48 win.

4. Mount Carmel 16-8 (4)

Luke Segroves, son of coach Phil Segroves, scores 10 points in 68-34 victory over Eisenhower.

5. Leo 17-4 (6)

Elon Henderson contributes 14 points as Lions roar past St. Rita 69-43 for seventh straight win.

6. St. Laurence 19-5 (5)

Coach Roshawn Russell looks to get Vikings back on track after 63-51 loss to St. Ignatius.

7. Lincoln-Way Central 16-7 (7)

Alex Panos pours in 20 points as Knights sweep crosstown rival Lincoln-Way West with 55-45 win.

8. Brother Rice 16-9 (8)

Zach Grabowski completes his big week with 17 points in Sunday’s 62-43 win over Lemont.

9. Joliet Catholic 16-7 (NR)

Danny Cervantes comes through with 16 points as Hilltoppers stun St. Ignatius 74-70 on the road.

10. Rich Township 12-11 (10)

Kavon Ammons produces 19 points as Raptors take OT thriller 61-59 over Thornwood.

Player of the Week

Senior guard Jayden Armstrong pours in 35 points in Joliet Catholic’s 74-70 win over St. Ignatius, scores 25 points in a 64-58 victory over Nazareth and then picks up 31 points in a 93-46 win over Pontiac. He surpasses 1,000 career points in the process.

Alaska Sports Scoreboard: Jan. 31, 2026

Feb. 1—High school

Girls hockey

Friday

Service/East 3, Chugiak/Eagle River 2

Dimond/West 5, South/Bartlett 4

Boys hockey

Tuesday

Monroe Catholic 3, Lathrop 2

North Pole 7, Delta 1

Wasilla 4, Palmer 3

Soldotna 2, Kenai Central 0

Thursday

North Pole 5, Monroe Catholic 1

Friday

North Pole 2, Houston 1

Wasilla 9, Lathrop 2

West Valley 4, Colony 1

Kenai Central 2, Homer 0

West 3, Chugiak 0

Eagle River 6, Bartlett 3

Soldotna 5, Kodiak 0

Tri Valley 5, Monroe Catholic 4

Saturday

Wasilla 7, West Valley 2

Soldotna 4, Kodiak 2

Basketball

Girls

Monday

Redington 40, Lumen Christi 9

Chugiak 44, South 38

Diamond 73, East 37

Craig 68, Haines 13

Kuinerrarmiut Elitnaurviat 66, Anna Tobeluk 11

Tuesday

Unalaska 60, Cook Inlet Academy 20

Tok 82, Walter Northway 31

Craig 72, Haines 8

Mountain City Christian Academy 77, Wasilla 63

Wednesday

Shaktoolik 99, Aniguiin 12

Dillingham 29, Unalakleet 27

Unalaska 65, Ninilchik 20

Kalskag 56, Akiachak 45

Wasilla 60, Dimond 38

North Pole 51, Valdez 48

Scammon Bay 58, Ket'acik and Aapalluk Memorial 16

Kotzebue 54, Delta 39

Skagway 51, Angoon 31

Chevak 52, Hooper Bay 39

Alakanuk 48, Tuluksak 47

Thursday

Nenana 37, Unalakleet 35

Delta 63, Hutchison 34

Skagway 44, Angoon 29

Tri-Valley 57, Jimmy Huntington 7

Hooper Bay 70, Tuluksak 50

Kenai Central 58, Bethel 40

Minto 58, Bristol Bay 42

Shaktoolik 79, Aniguiin 28

Newhalen 84, Akiachak 26

Kotlik 37, Ignatius Beans 31

Palmer 55, West Valley 27

Tanalian 51, Chief Ivan Blunka 34

Tok 52, Walter Northway 25

Mt. Edgecumbe 70, Redington 27

Galena 64, Kotzebue 47

Sitka 52, Houston 13

Seward 58, Unalaska 21

Scammon Bay 56, Lewis Angapak 31

Nikiski 43, Homer 31

Petersburg 44, Haines 12

Fort Yukon 54, Hoonah 53

Manokotak 42, Togiak 29

Shaktoolik 73, Hogarth Kingeekuk Sr. Memorial 17

Akiuk Memorial 67, Kalskag 20

Emmonak 53, Kotlik 49

Chevak 66, Alakanuk 43

Cordova 38, Dillingham 29

Craig 45, Wrangell 28

Friday

Metlakatla 37, Unalakleet 31

Nome-Beltz 45, Galena 37

Newhalen 71, Akiak 20

Unalaska 44, Bethel 25

Tri-Valley 63, Tok 51

Delta 42, Nome-Beltz 39

Bristol Bay 63, Hoonah 46

Bartlett 76, West 35

Sand Point 52, King Cove 30

South 50, East 34

Scammon Bay 47, Chevak 26

Seward 57, Kenai Central 15

Aniak 56, Akiachak 35

Dimond 61, West Valley 25

Wasilla 66, Kodiak 16

Fort Yukon 41, Minto 39

Ketchikan 48, Juneau-Douglas 37

Kotzebue 40, Hutchison 30

Akiak 37, Kalskag 27

Craig 50, Wrangell 42

Nunamiut 62, Kali 35

Saturday

Unalakleet 37, Lumen Christi 10

Dimond 57, Palmer 47

Hooper Bay 53, Chevak 51

Kenai Central 63, Unalaska 32

Minto 44, Hoonah 38

Newhalen 43, Akiuk Memorial 34

Valdez 56, West Valley 44

West 61, Service 56

Boys

Monday

Hydaburg 56, Gustavus 31

Lumen Christi 39, Redington 32

South 72, Chugiak 52

Haines 65, Craig 38

Tuesday

Hydaburg 62, Gustavus 48

Cook Inlet Academy 67, Unalaska 35

Wasilla 83, Mountain City Christian Academy 49

Walter Northway 87, Tok 65

Haines 57, Craig 21

Wednesday

Shaktoolik 103, Aniguiin 42

Angoon 58, Skagway 55

Akiachak 68, Kalskag 57

Unalakleet 70, Dillingham 56

Delta 83, Kotzebue 55

Ninilchik 68, Unalaska 45

North Pole 49, Ketchikan 42

Scammon Bay 52, Ket'acik and Aapalluk Memorial 46

Thursday

South 47, Dimond 46

Delta 55, Hutchison 36

Ket'acik and Aapalluk Memorial 46, Ayaprun 0

Metlakatla 76, Nenana 16

Unalakleet 55, Glennallen 36

Dillingham 62, Cordova 31

Bethel 71, Kenai Central 62

Minto 82, Bristol Bay 44

Nome-Beltz 77, Hutchison 37

Petersburg 57, Haines 38

Seward 62, Unalaska 55

Sitka 64, Houston 21

Shaktoolik 98, Aniguiin 26

Scammon Bay 73, Lewis Angapak 41

Galena 83, Kotzebue 44

Tanalian 90, Manokotak 51

Hoonah 59, Fort Yukon 55

West Valley 55, Ketchikan 36

Shaktoolik 121, Hogarth Kingeekuk Sr. Memorial 43

Mt. Edgecumbe 76, Redington 59

Wrangell 56, Craig 47

Skagway 91, Angoon 31

Friday

Nome-Beltz 78, Galena 42

Ket'acik and Aapalluk Memorial 57, Alakanuk 54

Unalakleet 59, Metlakatla 44

Kuinerrarmiut Elitnaurviat 61, Akula Elitnaurvik 45

Bristol Bay 51, Hoonah 44

Nome-Beltz 56, Delta 36

Davis-Romoth 81, Aqqaluk 41

South 60, Ketchikan 40

Petersburg 59, Haines 46

Sitka 68, Houston 23

Kali 65, Meade River 43

Minto 77, Fort Yukon 47

Davis-Romoth 85, Aqqaluk 40

Lumen Christi 49, Dillingham 25

Tanalian 74, Newhalen 72

East 79, Eagle River 33

Wasilla 66, Kodiak 16

Colony 58, Soldotna 42

Seward 49, Kenai Central 40

West 75, Bartlett 30

West Valley 68, Dimond 65

Chevak 63, Scammon Bay 45

Kuinerrarmiut Elitnaurviat 69, Nuniwarmiut 58

Ket'acik and Aapalluk Memorial 51, Hooper Bay 44

Russian Mission 81, Emmonak 73

Mt. Edgecumbe 77, Redington 59

Saturday

Davis-Romoth 65, Aqqaluk 39

Kenai Central 65, Unalaska 48

Eek 105, Kuinerrarmiut Elitnaurviat 68

Dimond 74, Ketchikan 64

Scammon Bay 60, Ket'acik and Aapalluk Memorial 35

Wasilla 83, Kodiak 52

Minto 81, Hoonah 45

Sitka 68, Redington 28

College

Hockey

Tuesday

Long Island University 4, UAA 3

Friday

UAF 5, LIU 1

Saturday

UAF vs. LIU (Late)

Women's basketball

Thursday

UAA 60, Central Washington 50

Northwest Nazarene 84, UAF 45

Saturday

Northwest Nazarene 80, UAA 64

UAF vs. Central Washington (Late)

Men's basketball

Thursday

Western Washington 84, UAA 75

UAF 68, Simon Fraser 57

Saturday

Western Washington 96, UAF 89

UAA vs. Simon Fraser (Late)

NAHL

Friday

Anchorage Wolverines 3, Fairbanks Ice Dogs 0

Saturday

Anchorage Wolverines vs. Fairbanks Ice Dogs (Late)

With Trump’s Greenland plan stalled and WLFI price volatility and macroeconomic uncertainty, XRPstaking offers a more robust asset participation path

WLFI volatility weakens short-term trading confidence as investors turn to XRPstaking for structured, predictable yields. As Donald Trump restarts his long-term plan to acquire Greenland, interest in World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has surged, and its recent market performance has once…

❌