Reading view

Airfare Caps Lifted: Indian Flyers Face A New Era Of Unpredictable Fares!

Read full article: https://www.travelandtourworld.com/news/article/airfare-caps-lifted-indian-flyers-face-a-new-era-of-unpredictable-fares/

Airfare Caps Lifted: Indian Flyers Face A New Era Of Unpredictable Fares!India removes temporary domestic airfare caps from March 23,...

Read More

Source: Travel And Tour World

TTW-1570721-1774337404

Original Source: Travel And Tour World
Unauthorized copying or republishing is prohibited.

TTW-1570721-20260324065021

Samsung doesn’t need HBM in Galaxy if this laser tech delivers

Samsung is betting on laser tech that fires a quadrillion times per second. It is one of those moves that won’t show up in a spec sheet, but you will probably feel the difference when your phone doesn’t randomly die due to aging.

The company is pushing femtosecond laser cutting across its whole semiconductor operation. This tech uses ultrafast pulses measured in femtoseconds to slice wafers without the heat damage and debris that older methods leave behind.

Laser cutting process

Samsung started small last year with HBM4 memory, testing a handful of units. Worked well enough that the company has just placed orders for at least ten more machines, a mix of grooving rigs and full-cut units.

The speed minimizes the heat-affected zone without material loss and debris creation during the process. Traditional methods use diamond blades or nanosecond lasers, which sounds fast until you realize nanoseconds are a billion times slower than femtoseconds.

Compared to traditional blade and nanosecond/picosecond laser dicing methods, this approach demonstrates superior thermal confinement and structural integrity control.

The tech expanding beyond HBM4

Samsung brought in a few femtosecond units for HBM4 in mid-2024. Now, the company is talking about expanding this across DRAM, NAND flash, and system chips.

The company has started mass production of HBM4 chips in February 2026 at its Pyeongtaek campus, and femtosecond cutting is apparently key to hitting its yield targets on that.

Your Galaxy doesn’t use HBM4, but it uses plenty of other Samsung chips. NAND for storage and system chips for processing. If this laser tech spreads like Samsung claims it will, that is better quality control across the board.

Samsung HBM4

The post Samsung doesn’t need HBM in Galaxy if this laser tech delivers appeared first on Sammy Fans.

Newcastle United renew pursuit of Chelsea star as lack of minutes raise question over future

Newcastle United are once again monitoring the situation of Chelsea striker Liam Delap as the summer transfer window approaches, with the club keen to strengthen their attacking depth ahead of the 2026-27 season.

Report from talkSPORT suggest the Magpies are preparing to revisit their long-standing interest in the 23-year-old forward.

DOWNLOAD THE OFFICIAL CAUGHTOFFSIDE APP FOR ALL THE LATEST & BREAKING UPDATES – STRAIGHT TO YOUR PHONE! ON APPLE & GOOGLE PLAY

Delap’s limited opportunities at Stamford Bridge this season have sparked growing speculation about his future, and Chelsea are understood to be open to discussions should a suitable offer arrive.

Limited minutes at Chelsea raise questions

Delap’s first season at Chelsea has not unfolded as smoothly as many expected when he joined from Ipswich Town last summer.

The move was initially viewed as a step forward for the young striker following a promising spell that showcased his strength, direct running, and eye for goal. However, competition within Chelsea’s attacking ranks has made regular playing time difficult to secure.

The English attacker has scored juse one Premier League goal this season and has featured for the Blues for 791 minutes in the league.

Under head coach Liam Rosenior, Chelsea’s tactical structure has largely revolved around João Pedro, who has impressed in the central striker role.

His consistent performances, movement in the box, and ability to link play have made him the preferred No. 9 option, leaving Delap to feature mostly in rotation or late-game situations.

Newcastle’s long term interest remains strong

Liam Delap reacts during Chelsea vs Wolves
Liam Delap reacts during Chelsea vs Wolves (Photo by Julian Finney/Getty Images)

Newcastle United’s interest in Delap is not new. The club reportedly attempted to sign him in 2025 following his emergence as one of the league’s most promising young forwards.

That pursuit ultimately fell short, but Newcastle have continued to track his progress closely.

Sources close to the club indicate that Newcastle view Delap as a player who could complement their existing forward options, offering a physical alternative capable of thriving in high-intensity matches.

His ability to press defenders and make aggressive runs behind defensive lines is seen as a valuable asset, especially in matches where physical duels and aerial strength are required.

Despite his uncertain role, Chelsea are not under pressure to sell. Delap signed a long-term contract that runs until June 2031, placing the club in a strong negotiating position.

Any potential transfer would likely require a substantial offer, particularly given the inflated market for young English forwards.

Six Chelsea players exploring transfers away, five more could follow

The post Newcastle United renew pursuit of Chelsea star as lack of minutes raise question over future appeared first on CaughtOffside.

Indonesia February 2026: Suzuki Carry Pikap takes the lead

The Suzuki Carry Pikap is the best-selling vehicle in Indonesia in February.

It’s a very dynamic month for Indonesian new vehicle sales, with wholesales up 12.3% year-on-year in February to 81,159 units, leading to a year-to-date volume up 10% to 147,631. Retail sales are in equally good shape at +11.9% to 78,219 for the month and up 8.5% YTD to 145,228.

Toyota (-7.7%) suffers but keeps the wholesales top spot with 27.8% share, with sister brand Daihatsu (+12.5%) in tow. Suzuki (+103.3%) surges ahead to #3 ahead of Mitsubishi (+4.8%) and a disappointing Honda (-38.5%). BYD (+232.6%) scores the biggest YoY gain in the Top 10 but drops two spots on January to 5.7% share vs. 6.5% so far this year. Launched last August, newcomer Jaecoo steps up two ranks to a break all its record at #7 with 3,005 sales and 3.7% share. It now also ranks #7 year-to-date.

Retail-wise, this time Toyota (+2.7%) is in positive to 29.2% share, followed by Daihatsu (-1.3%), Suzuki (+78.3%) and Mitsubishi (+13.6%). Honda (-39.5%) is in equally bad shape. BYD is up 141.7% to #6 above Jaecoo.

In the wholesales model ranking, the Suzuki New Carry Pikap (+215.8%) triples its sales year-on-year to take the lead by far with 8.2% share. This is the 2nd straight month a mini pickup tops the charts after the Daihatsu Gran Max Pikap (+54.4%) ranked #1 (it is down to #3 this month but remains #1 YTD). This is also the first time since January 2022 that the Carry is #1 in Indonesia. The Toyota Kijang Innova (-21.5%) repeats at #2 but freefalls year-on-year. The new BYD Atto 1 slowly returns to more reasonable results: falling from 12.7% at launch last October to 4.6% this month which is its lowest share yet. The Jaecoo J5 is up one spot to a record 8th place with 3.6% share.

Previous month: Indonesia January 2026: Daihatsu Gran Max Pikap signs first ever win

One year ago: Indonesia February 2025: Denza shoots up

Full February 2026 Top 43 All brands (wholesales and retail) and Top 180 models (wholesales) below.

Note: medium and heavy commercial vehicles are included in the brands rankings but not in models.

Indonesia February 2026 – brands (wholesales):

PosBrandFeb-26%/25Jan2026%/25PosFY25
1Toyota22,52227.8%– 7.7%142,60028.9%– 8.3%11
2Daihatsu13,45216.6%+ 12.5%225,96517.6%+ 18.3%22
3Suzuki9,65911.9%+ 103.3%612,4428.4%+ 27.8%44
4Mitsubishi7,0088.6%+ 4.8%313,9069.4%+ 18.7%33
5Honda5,3856.6%– 38.5%59,4016.4%– 41.4%65
6BYD4,6535.7%+ 232.6%49,5326.5%+ 279.3%56
7Jaecoo3,0053.7%new95,0303.4%new717
8Mitsubishi Fuso2,5063.1%+ 19.0%74,8383.3%+ 14.9%87
9Isuzu1,9482.4%+ 2.4%84,1182.8%+ 0.2%98
10Hyundai1,7412.1%– 21.8%113,1662.1%– 30.2%1110
11Hino1,6502.0%+ 5.3%103,2062.2%+ 12.4%1012
12Wuling1,4971.8%– 22.6%122,5741.7%– 12.6%1211
13Chery1,1521.4%– 21.5%132,2161.5%– 13.8%139
14Geely1,1231.4%+ 1601.5%141,7701.2%+ 2581.8%1418
15Aion9211.1%+ 479.2%151,5451.0%+ 538.4%1515
16GWM3810.5%+ 256.1%175940.4%+ 251.5%1722
17Mazda3100.4%+ 50.5%184970.3%+ 28.8%1816
18Denza2700.3%– 70.4%166620.4%– 29.3%1614
19BMW 2280.3%+ 26.0%233570.2%+ 60.1%2121
20Xpeng2190.3%new203910.3%new2028
21Jetour2170.3%+ 164.6%194020.3%+ 390.2%1929
22Mercedes1520.2%– 0.7%272310.2%– 20.9%2419
23Changan1300.2%new351560.1%new27 –
24Vinfast1210.1%+ 1628.6%212720.2%+ 988.0%2213
25Citroen1140.1%– 25.5%281900.1%– 25.2%2524
26MG1110.1%– 51.1%222540.2%– 31.5%2320
27Lexus1000.1%– 8.3%311490.1%– 6.3%2825
28Ford810.1%+ 62.0%331210.1%+ 18.6%3031
29FAW630.1%+ 10.5%241770.1%+ 52.6%2626
30BAIC600.1%+ 17.6%301170.1%+ 62.5%3132
31Polytron580.1%new251400.1%new2936
32UD Trucks520.1%– 70.8%291090.1%– 71.9%3323
33Neta470.1%– 39.7% –470.0%– 72.0%3733
34Mini440.1%– 53.7%34700.0%– 35.8%3535
35Nissan360.0%– 76.2%36560.0%– 70.2%3627
36Scania350.0%– 38.6%32820.1%– 30.5%3434
37Dongfeng (DFSK)300.0%– 62.0%261100.1%+ 14.6%3230
38Kia 270.0%+ 80.0% –270.0%– 42.6%4042
39Subaru240.0%+ 41.2%37390.0%+ 18.2%3838
40Volkswagen230.0%+ 283.3%38360.0%+ 260.0%3939
41Volvo20.0%– 80.0%3980.0%– 50.0%4140
42Audi20.0%+ 0.0%4030.0%+ 50.0%4243

Indonesia February 2026 – brands (retail):

PosBrandFeb-26%/25Jan2026%/25PosFY25
1Toyota22,81229.2%+ 2.7%144,87830.9%+ 2.5%11
2Daihatsu12,33615.8%– 1.3%223,53816.2%– 1.1%22
3Suzuki9,03511.6%+ 78.3%414,53610.0%+ 51.5%35
4Mitsubishi7,0179.0%+ 13.6%313,1589.1%+ 21.4%44
5Honda4,6886.0%– 39.5%58,9216.1%– 46.0%53
6BYD 3,5964.6%+ 141.7%76,1124.2%+ 145.2%66
7Jaecoo3,0283.9%new95,0593.5%new818
8Mitsubishi Fuso2,6183.3%+ 21.9%65,1563.6%+ 30.2%77
9Isuzu2,0312.6%– 5.5%84,1162.8%+ 8.7%98
10Hyundai1,7342.2%– 19.5%113,1372.2%– 24.5%1111
11Hino1,5602.0%– 20.7%103,2162.2%– 21.1%1010
12Wuling1,5031.9%– 26.1%132,5501.8%– 31.1%129
13Chery1,1671.5%– 12.1%122,3581.6%– 6.6%1312
14Geely1,1011.4%new151,6861.2%new1420
15Aion7120.9%+ 460.6%141,3871.0%+ 388.4%1515
16Mazda3590.5%+ 20.9%185510.4%+ 1.3%1716
17GWM3500.4%+ 348.7%165610.4%+ 284.2%1624
18Denza3490.4%– 32.8%175430.4%+ 4.6%1814
19BMW 2580.3%– 16.8%194440.3%– 18.5%1919
20Vinfast2250.3%+ 400.0%223660.3%+ 401.4%2113
21Jetour2220.3%+ 270.0%203660.3%+ 510.0%2031
22Mercedes1960.3%– 37.2%213380.2%– 28.5%2217
23Xpeng1760.2%new262530.2%new2330
24Lexus1220.2%– 3.9%291850.1%+ 0.5%2622
25Citroen1100.1%– 2.7%251910.1%– 3.5%2523
26Dongfeng (DFSK)1000.1%+ 163.2%242010.1%+ 161.0%2429
27Polytron970.1%new371090.1%new3236
28Ford850.1%+ 54.5%301450.1%+ 19.8%2928
29UD Trucks790.1%– 39.7%271530.1%– 35.4%2825
30BAIC750.1%+ 74.4%311270.1%+ 78.9%3032
31Neta750.1%+ 36.4% –750.1%– 30.6%3535
32FAW630.1%+ 10.5%231770.1%+ 52.6%2726
33Changan600.1%new40660.0%new36 –
34MG590.1%– 75.7%281250.1%– 69.4%3121
35Nissan450.1%– 60.2%33840.1%– 58.4%3327
36Mini370.0%– 40.3%34530.0%– 38.4%3733
37Scania350.0%– 38.6%32820.1%– 30.5%3434
38Subaru290.0%+ 45.0%36430.0%– 14.0%3837
39Kia 280.0%– 30.0% –280.0%– 58.8%4138
40Maxus 220.0%+ 175.0%35370.0%+ 19.4%3940
41Volkswagen210.0%+ 200.0%38330.0%+ 120.0%4039
42Volvo20.0%– 80.0%3980.0%– 50.0%4241
43Audi20.0%+ 0.0%4130.0%+ 0.0%4343

Indonesia February 2026 – models (wholesales):

PosModelFeb-26%/25Jan2026%/25PosFY25
1Suzuki New Carry Pikap6,6808.2%+ 215.8%277,3375.0%+ 77.6%38
2Toyota Kijang Innova4,7155.8%– 21.5%28,8726.0%– 20.6%21
3Daihatsu Gran Max Pikap (PU)4,4585.5%+ 54.4%19,3836.4%+ 59.8%12
4BYD Atto 13,7004.6%new47,0614.8%new510
5Toyota Rush3,4784.3%+ 10.0%124,6983.2%– 27.6%96
6Honda Brio3,4694.3%– 36.9%37,1414.8%– 29.8%45
7Toyota Calya3,0363.7%– 16.3%243,7502.5%– 39.8%127
8Jaecoo J52,9263.6%new94,8683.3%new864
9Mitsubishi Xpander2,5063.1%– 1.3%75,1003.5%– 2.3%69
10Daihatsu Gran Max BV/MB2,4043.0%+ 158.8%84,5393.1%+ 181.1%1011
11Toyota Avanza1,7962.2%– 35.3%55,0323.4%– 4.4%73
12Daihatsu Sigra1,3081.6%– 60.3%63,9182.7%– 43.2%114
13Mitsubishi Pajero Sport1,2621.6%+ 57.4%212,0931.4%+ 17.2%1924
14Daihatsu Terios1,2291.5%– 27.2%182,1751.5%– 17.6%1614
15Mitsubishi L-300 Pikap1,1871.5%+ 25.6%142,3521.6%+ 27.3%1516
16Toyota Agya1,1801.5%– 26.6%132,3551.6%– 37.5%1413
17Toyota Hilux1,1791.5%– 18.6%102,5191.7%– 1.0%1312
18Wuling Darion1,1281.4%new221,9181.3%new2258
19Toyota Fortuner1,1031.4%– 5.6%162,1651.5%– 9.2%1715
20Honda WR-V1,0681.3%+ 59.6% –1,0680.7%– 16.6%3141
21Daihatsu Ayla1,0601.3%+ 0.2%191,9601.3%– 5.6%2121
22Suzuki XL71,0101.2%+ 65.8%311,5531.1%– 6.1%2526
23Toyota Raize9281.1%– 19.7%151,9981.4%– 11.7%2019
24Isuzu Traga PHR8571.1%+ 15.3%171,8991.3%+ 12.7%2320
25Hyundai Stargazer8211.0%+ 6.6%231,6011.1%– 0.5%2428
26Mitsubishi Destinator 8211.0%new112,1351.4%new1825
27Suzuki Fronx8171.0%new261,4981.0%new2717
28Mitsubishi L200 Triton8011.0%– 50.9%291,3960.9%– 18.8%2823
29Toyota Hilux Rangga7921.0%+ 115.2%251,4991.0%+ 88.1%2632
30Geely EX2 Max/Pro7761.0%new331,1990.8%new30 –
31Honda HR-V7150.9%– 47.8%449440.6%– 58.4%3518
32BYD M65230.6%– 52.2%201,3740.9%– 17.9%2922
33Daihatsu Xenia5200.6%– 63.5%321,0200.7%– 40.8%3234
34Toyota Veloz4980.6%– 55.8%735470.4%– 72.5%4627
35Suzuki APV Minibus4540.6%+ 233.8%705120.3%+ 153.5%4855
36Toyota Hiace4500.6%– 44.3%301,0010.7%– 33.0%3331
37Chery Tiggo 84350.5%+ 51.0%387590.5%+ 12.6%3836
38Mitsubishi Xforce4310.5%– 17.4%358300.6%– 7.3%3744
39Chery Tiggo Cross4200.5%+ 92.7%348370.6%+ 283.9%3639
40Aion UT 4070.5%new416730.5%new4070
41Daihatsu Rocky3750.5%– 14.6%396700.5%– 19.6%4149
42Hyundai Creta3570.4%– 52.0%377110.5%– 61.0%3937
43Daihatsu Luxio3460.4%+ 51.8%465480.4%+ 97.8%4550
44BYD Sealion 73430.4%+ 89.5%289560.6%+ 428.2%3429
45Geely EX5 Max3350.4%+ 407.6%504810.3%+ 628.8%4951
46Toyota Yaris Cross3350.4%– 12.1%425920.4%– 9.6%4345
47Aion V3320.4%new455460.4%new4747
48Suzuki Jimny2870.4%+ 4.4%405670.4%+ 14.1%4452
49Denza D92700.3%– 70.4%366620.4%– 29.3%4230
50Hyundai Palisade2330.3%+ 115.7%593140.2%+ 81.5%5165
51Xpeng X92080.3%new563130.2%new5282
52Hyundai Kona2070.3%+ 250.8%812440.2%+ 183.7%5677
53Suzuki Alpha1620.2%– 67.3%434050.3%– 59.2%5040
54Suzuki Grand Vitara1570.2%– 36.2%632270.2%– 54.3%5861
55GWM Tank 3001560.2%+ 246.7%522880.2%+ 255.6%5478
56Jetour T21550.2%new512990.2%new53 –
57GWM Tank 5001490.2%+ 496.0%1091630.1%+ 328.9%67132
58Mazda CX-31280.2%+ 6300.0%691880.1%+ 6166.7%6479
59Wuling Cortez1270.2%+ 98.4%1171380.1%+ 35.3%7084
60Aion Y Plus1200.1%+ 50.0%651870.1%+ 14.7%6585
61Wuling Alvez1170.1%– 19.9%601960.1%– 30.0%6267
62Changan Lumin1100.1%new –1100.1%new75 –
63Hyundai Santa Fe1020.1%– 70.3%542130.1%– 62.6%6063
64MG 4950.1%– 49.7%571900.1%– 33.1%6374
65Chery J6T910.1%new492390.2%new57116
66Vinfast VF 3880.1%new532070.1%new6162
67Honda BR-V870.1%– 91.6%581760.1%– 90.8%6638
68Mazda CX-5850.1%+ 14.9%831210.1%+ 39.1%7176
69Suzuki S-Presso790.1%– 55.4%472610.2%– 5.1%5566
70Chery Tiggo 9750.1%new771160.1%new72102
71Citroen C3740.1%– 10.8%821100.1%– 7.6%7672
72BYD Seal700.1%+ 169.2%761150.1%– 63.0%7369
73BMW X1680.1%+ 106.1%99930.1%+ 173.5%79139
74Lexus LM650.1%– 12.2%791030.1%– 5.5%7773
75Chery Omoda E5640.1%– 65.8%93920.1%– 67.7%8068
76Aion Hyptec620.1%– 21.5%621390.1%+ 75.9%6959
77GWM Ora 03620.1%new84940.1%new78104
78Toyota Alphard620.1%– 86.1%482150.1%– 75.4%5953
79BMW X5610.1%+ 84.8%102820.1%+ 82.2%84138
80Wuling Binguo600.1%– 65.7%110740.1%– 77.0%9142
81BMW 3 Series550.1%+ 450.0%551620.1%+ 1250.0%68127
82Mazda CX-60530.1%– 32.9%94800.1%– 20.0%87105
83Toyota Camry500.1%n/a106680.0%n/a94108
84Ford Everest480.1%+ 128.6%90770.1%+ 42.6%89101
85Neta V470.1%– 14.5% –470.0%– 58.0%10391
86Toyota Voxy460.1%– 54.5% –460.0%– 62.0%10875
87Honda Step WGN440.1%new97700.0%new9397
88Suzuki Ertiga430.1%– 74.7%641120.1%– 70.0%7460
89Jaecoo J8420.1%new89720.0%new92114
90Citroen C3 Aircross SUV400.0%– 42.9%78800.1%– 40.7%8694
91Chery Omoda 5370.0%– 21.3%80740.1%– 49.7%9081
92Jaecoo J7370.0%new71900.1%new8386
93BAIC BJ30350.0%new101570.0%new100137
94Ford Ranger330.0%+ 13.8%115440.0%– 8.3%109106
95Mercedes E-Class330.0%+ 10.0%116440.0%– 24.1%110115
96Jetour Dashing320.0%– 30.4%87630.0%+ 37.0%9692
97Vinfast VF e34320.0%+ 540.0%108470.0%+ 176.5%10433
98Jetour X70P300.0%– 16.7%118400.0%+ 11.1%111111
99Polytron G3300.0%new92590.0%new99133
100Seres E502300.0%+ 233.3%127380.0%+ 153.3%112150
101Toyota Vios300.0%– 18.9%95570.0%+ 32.6%101162
102Polytron G3+280.0%new72810.1%new85113
103Mini Cooper260.0%– 67.1%104460.0%– 49.5%107110
104Nissan Serena250.0%– 76.2%121350.0%– 68.5%11589
105Chery iCar 03240.0%– 96.2%66910.1%– 91.4%8135
106BAIC BJ40 Plus220.0%– 40.5%86530.0%– 7.0%10299
107Mazda CX-8220.0%+ 214.3%114340.0%+ 161.5%116152
108Toyota Land Cruiser 300220.0%– 54.2% –220.0%– 74.4%12596
109Hyundai Ioniq 5210.0%– 80.7%156230.0%– 86.5%12383
110Changan Deepal S07200.0%new96460.0%new106 –
111Daihatsu Sirion200.0%+ 100.0% –200.0%+ 100.0%128124
112Kia Carens190.0%+ 850.0% –190.0%+ 850.0%130217
113BYD Dolphin170.0%– 54.1%123260.0%– 42.2%12093
114Lexus RX170.0%– 29.2% –170.0%– 41.4%133112
115Wuling Mitra 170.0%new131240.0%new12290
116Toyota Yaris160.0%+ 60.0%103370.0%+ 0.0%114130
117VW ID.BUZZ160.0%new130230.0%new124155
118Mazda3150.0%– 76.2%74630.0%– 61.1%9780
119Wuling Air150.0%– 97.3%85470.0%– 93.1%10543
120Wuling Formo150.0%– 95.2%75620.0%– 86.3%9871
121BMW X3140.0%+ 180.0%107290.0%+ 480.0%119129
122GWM Haval Jolion140.0%– 54.8% –140.0%– 68.2%137131
123Mini Countryman140.0%+ 180.0%135190.0%+ 171.4%131154
124Wuling Cloud130.0%– 97.2%100380.0%– 92.7%11354
125BMW 7 Series120.0%+ 140.0%133170.0%+ 183.3%132172
126Geely Starray120.0%new61900.1%new82117
127Lexus LX110.0%+ 450.0%119210.0%+ 90.9%126159
128Xpeng G6110.0%new67780.1%new88151
129MG HS100.0%n/a120200.0%n/a129178
130Mercedes A-Class90.0%+ 28.6%171100.0%+ 11.1%146183
131Subaru Forester90.0%– 10.0%143130.0%– 7.1%140160
132Toyota bZ4X90.0%+ 125.0%129160.0%+ 100.0%134170
133Kia Sonet80.0%n/a –80.0%– 73.3%153195
134Mercedes GLA80.0%– 27.3%128150.0%– 6.3%136169
135Mercedes GLC70.0%– 75.9%147100.0%– 70.6%147122
136VW Tiguan70.0%+ 40.0%144110.0%+ 22.2%145171
137Chery Tiggo 8 Pro60.0%– 33.3%15480.0%– 81.4%152143
138Mercedes C-Class60.0%– 25.0%134110.0%+ 10.0%144125
139Mercedes GLE60.0%– 94.1% –60.0%– 94.2%158121
140Nissan X-Trail60.0%n/a126140.0%n/a138167
141BMW X750.0%+ 150.0%14680.0%+ 300.0%151134
142Mazda MX-550.0%+ 0.0%13990.0%+ 80.0%149189
143Wuling Almaz50.0%– 83.3%16470.0%– 89.6%157119
144BMW 5 Series40.0%– 86.7%122130.0%– 59.4%139157
145Lexus NX40.0%+ 33.3%17050.0%+ 66.7%164185
146Mini Aceman40.0%– 33.3%16060.0%+ 0.0%159200
147Subaru BRZ40.0%+ 0.0%13690.0%+ 50.0%150173
148Subaru Outback40.0%+ 33.3%17850.0%– 16.7%167210
149Subaru WRX40.0%– 98.7%16260.0%– 98.1%161107
150Toyota Corolla Cross40.0%– 50.0% –40.0%– 50.0%175144
151BAIC X-5530.0%– 78.6%13870.0%– 53.3%154168
152BMW 4 Series30.0%– 57.1%113150.0%+ 87.5%135165
153BMW i730.0%+ 0.0%125110.0%+ 266.7%143205
154BMW IX130.0%– 95.9%16740.0%– 95.1%168120
155Lexus LBX30.0%– 40.0% –30.0%– 50.0%178196
156Mercedes AMG GT30.0%n/a17240.0%n/a169213
157Mercedes CLA30.0%+ 50.0%105210.0%+ 600.0%127209
158Mercedes EQE30.0%– 25.0%14070.0%+ 75.0%155186
159Mercedes GLB30.0%+ 50.0%17640.0%+ 33.3%170212
160MG VS HEV30.0%– 25.0%15950.0%– 28.6%166123
161MG ZS30.0%– 88.9%91320.0%– 49.2%11787
162Nissan Kicks30.0%+ 200.0% –30.0%– 25.0%182204
163Subaru Crosstrek30.0%– 91.9%15060.0%– 85.0%160177
164Toyota GR 8630.0%– 40.0%15160.0%– 93.0%162161
165Honda e:N120.0%new –20.0%new184175
166Mazda MX-3020.0%n/a –20.0%+ 0.0%187228
167Mercedes G-Class20.0%n/a17530.0%n/a179224
168Mercedes GLS20.0%n/a17730.0%n/a180 –
169Mercedes S-Class20.0%+ 0.0%14850.0%+ 66.7%165197
170Mercedes V-Class20.0%+ 0.0%15840.0%+ 100.0%172216
171Nissan Terra20.0%– 60.0%16140.0%– 73.3%174181
172Toyota GR Yaris20.0%n/a –20.0%n/a188235
173Audi A610.0%n/a –10.0%n/a191 –
174Audi Q510.0%n/a –10.0%n/a193227
175Mercedes EQB10.0%n/a –10.0%n/a198218
176Mercedes Sprinter10.0%+ 0.0%13270.0%+ 133.3%156190
177Vinfast VF 610.0%new15240.0%new176201
178Volvo ES9010.0%new18020.0%new189237
179Volvo XC9010.0%n/a13760.0%+ 500.0%163198

Source: GAIKINDO

Token2049 Dubai postponed to 2027, Robinhood crypto volumes surge 9%, Ethereum Foundation formalizes mandate | Weekly recap

In this week’s edition of the weekly recap, Token2049 organizers postponed the Dubai edition until 2027 citing safety concerns from escalating Iran-Israel-U.S. tensions, Robinhood reported February crypto notional volumes increased 9% to $25 billion and the Ethereum Foundation published a…

Business Line powers UAE’s e‑invoicing with SAP

As the United Arab Emirates advances its digital tax transformation agenda, organizations across the country are preparing for the introduction of mandatory e-invoicing regulations in 2026. This landmark shift is set to redefine how businesses generate, exchange, and report invoices, reinforcing transparency, compliance, and operational efficiency across the national economy.

Positioning itself at the forefront of this transition, Business Line, a SAP partner, is enabling enterprises to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape with future-ready e-invoicing solutions and integrated SAP digital transformation services. By combining deep regulatory understanding with enterprise technology expertise, the company is helping organizations align their financial processes with the UAE’s next phase of digital governance.

The UAE’s e-invoicing initiative, led by the Ministry of Finance in collaboration with the Federal Tax Authority, is designed to standardize invoice reporting, enhance tax compliance, and enable real-time data exchange between businesses and authorities. As companies prepare to adopt structured electronic invoicing frameworks, the need for seamless integration with existing enterprise systems has become a strategic priority.

Business Line is supporting this transition by enabling organizations to integrate compliant e-invoicing capabilities within their SAP environments, ensuring automated invoice generation, secure data exchange, and alignment with regulatory standards. The company’s solutions are designed to help enterprises modernize legacy processes, improve financial visibility, and ensure readiness ahead of regulatory deadlines.

“E-invoicing marks a transformative step in the UAE’s digital economy journey,” said Ali Jafri, AVP – Sales, Middle East, Business Line. “Our focus is on helping organizations not only meet compliance requirements but also leverage this shift to strengthen their digital core through SAP-enabled automation and intelligent financial processes.”

By embedding compliance directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, Business Line enables businesses to streamline operations, reduce manual effort, and enhance accuracy across financial workflows. This integrated approach ensures organizations can respond to regulatory requirements with agility while building scalable, future-ready digital infrastructures.

As the UAE continues to strengthen its position as a global hub for innovation and digital excellence, e-invoicing is expected to play a pivotal role in driving efficiency and transparency across industries. With compliance timelines approaching, early adoption is critical for organizations seeking to mitigate risk and maintain business continuity.

Business Line remains committed to supporting enterprises throughout this transition, empowering them to achieve compliance, accelerate SAP-led transformation, and unlock new opportunities for growth in an increasingly digital business environment.

 

The post Business Line powers UAE’s e‑invoicing with SAP appeared first on My Startup World - Everything About the World of Startups!.

Reclaim Security raises $26M led by Acrew Capital

Reclaim Security, a preemptive exposure-remediation platform, announced $26 million in total funding, including a recent $20 million Series A round led by Acrew Capital, with participation from QP Ventures and Ibex Investors. The funding will accelerate the company’s mission to eliminate what many security leaders consider cybersecurity’s most persistent gap: remediation.

As attacker breakout times have fallen to as little as 27 seconds, enterprises still require an average of 27 days to remediate critical exposures. Over the past decade, organizations have invested heavily in detection tools to identify vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, yet resolving them remains largely manual, slow, and operationally risky. The result is an expanding backlog of exposures that security teams identify but struggle to safely close.

“There is a massive ‘Remediation Mirage’ in the market right now. Vendors are slapping an AI label on what is essentially just Prioritization 2.0 or faster ticket management,” says Barak Klinghofer, CEO and Co-founder of Reclaim Security.

​​”The recent launch of Claude Code, which wiped billions from the market value of traditional security giants, is a massive wake-up call. While such tools can identify hundreds of vulnerabilities in seconds, they also hand attackers an autonomous, high-speed engine for exploit generation. We’ve seen reports of AI-orchestrated espionage campaigns where 80-90% of tactical operations were executed autonomously. In this new reality, if your ‘remediation’ strategy still ends with a human reviewing a manual Jira ticket, you aren’t just slow, you’ve lost the race.

Reclaim is the only platform providing true Agentic Remediation. Through our PIPE engine, we’ve removed the fear of ‘breaking the business,’ allowing our AI to move from discovery to resolution in seconds. While others are perfecting the recommendation, we are perfecting the execution.”

Automating Cybersecurity’s “Last Mile”
Reclaim’s platform introduces the industry’s first AI Security Engineer, an autonomous system designed not only to identify exposures, but to resolve them safely and at scale.

At the core of the platform is PIPE (Productivity Impact Prediction Engine), a simulation engine that predicts the operational and business impact of a proposed security change before it is deployed. By accurately modeling how changes impact applications, workloads, user productivity and business processes, organizations can implement remediation without risking downtime or operational disruption.

This simulation-first approach enables organizations to:

  • Prioritize exposures most likely to be exploited by attackers
  • Deploy automated or semi-automated remediations safely
  • Reduce remediation timelines from weeks to minutes
  • Eliminate manual configuration and ticket-driven workflows, allowing security teams to focus on strategic initiatives

Reclaim analyzes how real attack techniques would traverse a specific environment, evaluates how existing defenses would respond, and predicts the operational impact of remediation before changes are deployed. By combining advanced attack path modeling with business-aware remediation, the company eliminates exploitable pathways safely and at scale. This approach enables a shift away from reactive “assume breach” strategies toward proactively removing exposure without disrupting critical business operations.

Real World Impact
Early enterprise customers across financial services, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure sectors report measurable results, including 80% increase in overall threat resilience, 75% increase in ROI from existing security stack and 90% reduction in manual effort when resolving critical exposures

“Security tools are excellent at explaining why something is risky,” said Mark Kraynak, Founding Partner at Acrew Capital. “What they don’t do is make remediation safe and practical. The real breakthrough isn’t more prioritization, it’s removing risk without breaking the business. Reclaim does exactly that, and that’s why it matters.”

The post Reclaim Security raises $26M led by Acrew Capital appeared first on My Startup World - Everything About the World of Startups!.

❌